51.5k Falkenwut Comments

  • Mig-29A 9-12 Soviet 3.1 years ago

    @Tang0five You seem to use the windows version, why not give it a spin? At least till the devs release an official version...

  • Mig-29A 9-12 Soviet 3.1 years ago

    @SyntheticL You are right. I gave it a basic star shape because i didn't want to add too much to the part count.

    I wish they would add ASCII characters to the new labels feature, it would save me A LOTTTTTT OF TIME...

    +2
  • Metal slug, dragon nosuke 3.1 years ago

    Bben following your Metal slug stuff recently, pretty damn impressive :D

    Perhaps you'd consider This bad boy for your next build?

  • ACAS Project (Advanced Close Air Support) WIP! 3.1 years ago

    Very nice model!! Keep it up!!

    +1
  • v1.11 F-5E Tiger [FINAL TEASER] 3.1 years ago

    Tag me when it's released please :)

  • Working ILS In SimplePlanes! 3.1 years ago

    Impressive work!! This should be something simpleplanes integraes in-game now that gauges are available

    +2
  • Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress 3.1 years ago

    Gorgeous model!!! Keep it up :)

  • Cessna 150 3.1 years ago

    Awesome work! Keep it up!

    +2
  • F104-RJ Super Starfighter 7.9 (My 200k build) 3.1 years ago

    @RamboJutter Oh yeah! I totally forgot about that! Nevermind I said that, awesome design!!

  • F104-RJ Super Starfighter 7.9 (My 200k build) 3.1 years ago

    Very nice design! was fun to fly!!
    From a realistic design perspective I'm not sure if the air-brake position would be a problem as it covers the Vertical Stabiliser. That's just me over-analysing...

  • v1.11 F-5E Tiger [TEASER 2] 3.1 years ago

    T !!!

  • Harrier GR.3 RAF No.1 Squad 3.1 years ago

    @Tang0five Perfect timing too! With the new update you can make a refueller version

  • Allstar Glider 18M 3.1 years ago

    Gorgeous glider!!! Keep it up!!

  • Simple IL-2M Stormovik 3.1 years ago

    I only have to address 2 small problems:
    1 - The flaps move upwards, a simple funky tree clamp(VTOL,0,1) would be great
    2 - The rear gunner seems stuck in position. Just a little bit of attachment editting would fix it right up!

    Other than that, it is a gorgeous build and a fun flier! keep it up!!

    +1
  • 1.11 Beta is now available 3.1 years ago

    I have to say I am impressed by this Update!!! Well done devs!!
    It takes some time to get used to some of the controls, but once you get the hang of it, it's brilliant! Now I really wish I had a VR headset to test out my latest A-8 Aquan D-3 Release!!

    +1
  • EP-2 VR 3.1 years ago

    Lovin this plane!! very nice, simple and elegant! Wish I had a VR headset to test it out!!!

  • Aeralis Dart Jet 3.2 years ago

    @Oogabooga21 You can use the transform part to move the required part in place. It is not a drag-and-drop system. Might need a remake in due time..

    +1
  • Simple Rifle 3.2 years ago

    Kar-98?

    +1
  • Boeing 747It's not done yet 3.2 years ago

    I suggest to wait for the next update to do this. It will reduce your part count significantly!!

    Other than that looks awesome!! Keep it up!!

  • F-111 3.2 years ago

    Builder: So, What armament would you want for this design?
    Designer: Yes...
    Builder: Where would y...
    Designer: Did I stutter?

  • Eurofighter Silent Typhoon 3.2 years ago

    @RamboJutter True come to think of it! Although since you used rotated blocks, your looks more like an f-19 I think...

  • AV-8 harrier 3.2 years ago

    Cute model. If you want to stabilise the plane without the use of Gyros, You will need:

    To add VTOL RCN pods around the body to have manual control

    and

    Ensure that the Centre of Mass is literally over the Centre of Thrust. That way it won't tilt forwards / backwards / Sideways during vertical lift

  • North American RA-5C Vigilante 3.2 years ago

    The elevator animation seems to be inverted, other than that, awesome job!! Keep it up!!!

    +2
  • Shenyang J-8G, 28 AD, PLAAF 3.2 years ago

    Excellent model! Keep it up!!

    +2
  • B-17 Flying Fortress 3.2 years ago

    @parkrangerjerry that's fine, as I said, it's a very good model so don't be hard on yourself!

  • B-17 Flying Fortress 3.2 years ago

    @parkrangerjerry flaps and bomb bay. would be something to consider once the new update it out

    +1
  • B-17 Flying Fortress 3.2 years ago

    Very good model!! Keep it up!
    A few alterations would have made it a gorgeous plane!

    +1
  • F-22 'Raptor' 3.2 years ago

    Great build!! Watched the commentary by "Laz" - Gave me a great appreciation to how much thought is put into the building process of this plane!

  • Shirojishi Sea Parzival FGR1 3.2 years ago

    Gorgeous plane! Interesting blend of rafale and f-18!! I will test this later!!

    +1
  • Grumman G-623V 3.2 years ago

    @Highbraker ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • MiG-29A Fulcrum-A 3.2 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer As mentioned, it's an open discussion.

    An air superiority fighter is usually a plane that can linger around in the sky for a long time, carry enough armament to take down as many planes as it can, supersonic and maneuverable.

    The mig-29 can do most of it, sure, but the only thing it suffers is flying time and loadout (at least compared to it's contemporaries). It's a fuel hog... if you ever tried the dcs version, you'll understand why it won't fly for long. And when you consider it's only 6 pylons (and 1 fuel-exclusive) you see it doesn't do much outside of intercept incoming enemies, rather than going to enemy lines... In essence it's kinda like an upgraded mig-21... just 2 extra pylons and more maneuverable...

    Again, I LOVE the mig-29, sexiest Russian military hardware! Just saying I don't think the early mig-29s would have done much...

    +2
  • MiG-29A Fulcrum-A 3.2 years ago

    Gorgeous model of the Mig-29!! Keep it up!!

    Small note:
    I don't think you could really call the mig-29a an air superiority fighter. The loadout is way too small and its capability beyond fighter isn't exactly top notch compared to the Su-27 or F-15. Just a small note open for discussion...

  • A-37B Dragonfly RVNAF 3.2 years ago

    Awesome work as always!!

    +1
  • Harrier GR.7 RAF No.4 Squad 3.2 years ago

    @Tang0five Yes, It's infuriating me. I can't seem to find why it's doing it!! Everything should be green. No reason to do it. :(
    (apologies for earlier comment, I misread your comment)

  • Mig-29 Fulcrum Mobile Dogfight series 3.2 years ago

    Pretty good basic model! Keep it up!!

  • Pls fix this issue ;( 3.2 years ago

    @TheSolarFlare that's why you should fix no.2.

    If you insist on using the bfe150, reduce the engine power using overload

  • MiG 21 3.2 years ago

    Not bad!! Keep it up! :)

  • Pls fix this issue ;( 3.2 years ago

    1 - The Centre of Mass is too close to the to the Centre of lift. IT should be closer to the front using Dead weight option

    2 - The engines you are using are WAY too strong for this small plane. Because of it, the whole plane flips. Instead of Blasto BFE150, suggest you use J15 or J50

    3 - Use Fusalage inlets in front of the Engine parts, it won't give you air-intake errors

  • Harrier GR.7 RAF No.4 Squad 3.2 years ago

    @CC1010 Felt like building them :3

  • Harrier FRS.1 RAF 899 Squad 3.2 years ago

    @Amirabadi 🤷 dunno, go to the mod page and ask there

  • keep it's simple 3.2 years ago

    @Infinity It'll be more maneuverable if it's closer to the centre of lift. If it's too close it will flip uncontrolably.

    Also for the Leaning to the right thing, I've been having the same problem, I think it's a bug, not sure though...

  • Harrier FRS.1 RAF 899 Squad 3.2 years ago

    @Amirabadi After you make sure the mod is active,
    - Pose the machine
    - pause the game and choose the camera angle you wish
    - press F9 to hide the hud and menu
    - press f12 to take a screenshot
    - Once you upload you machine, the last 3 screenshots will show.

  • Pusher Plane 3.2 years ago

    Very nice design! Keep up the good work!

    +1
  • help 3.2 years ago

    The roll function of the right wing should be "Roll" not "roll" - Capatalization is important in functions.

    Also, The Roll & VTOL fuselage parts are connected together. Check the Attachment editor to see if they should be connected or not.

  • keep it's simple 3.2 years ago

    The weight of the plane is too close to the Centre of lift. You will need to either put dead-weight closer to the engine, move the wings backward or move the fusalage forward.

  • Mechanical Steering Buggy 3.2 years ago

    This is a fantastic job!! Keep it up!
    I would have personally made the throttle the acceleration rather than the VTOL tab, other than that, it's perfect!!

    +1