@WinsWings thanks! Always glad to join an interesting challenge.
"The Aviator" is one of my favourite movies. Final H-4 scenes always give me goosebumps.
@CCCP0000001 yep, but I'm too dumb to make it. So I decided according to lore, soviets just bought western equipment.
@Vikram123 thanks.
@NormalCv580enjoyer these are actually the same names but differently transliterated
@TheOfficalMarylander actually it has interior only in the frontal part of fuselage.
If I did interior all fuselage long it would have approximately about 1700+ parts
It wasn't. It flew 3 months before Concorde. Except similar looking shape those two are really different designs. Tupolev is much bigger and heavier, It has engines much closer to the fuselage than Concorde has. And Tupolev has additional frontal folding stabilizers for flying at low speed.
The only reason they look similar is that supersonic aerodynamics works the same in the Soviet Union and in France
@Graingy Ilyushin's planes are known for relatively simple construction, and that makes them really reliable.
Unlike Tupolev's planes. Tupolev made really complicated designs, sometimes even ahead of its time (Like Tu-144). But on the other hand using cutting edge technologies made Tupolev's planes not so trustworthy like Ilyushin's planes. (First soviet jet airliner Tu-104 was a real disaster)
@CR929thenewSPplayer I tried to make Tu-154, but it wasn't good. I couldn't make central air intake. It was pretty bad-looking.
Anyway I look forward to see it from you. Good luck with that.
@NordicAerospace It wasn't easy to fit in 96 parts, but still it's quite possible
@NormalCv580enjoyer Thank you! My flight instructor once told me: "There's no better jet trainer than L-39 yet"
Since after that, this is my favourite airplane
@vonhubert Привет! К сожалению, у меня сейчас мало времени остаётся на игру, поэтому, пока не смогу этим заняться. Однако, даю все карты в руки, если хочешь сделать что-то с этим Антеем, буду только рад посмотреть что получится
@NormalCv580enjoyer @DatTrainGuy19 @JacksEpicGamingYT thanks guys!
@WinsWings thanks! Always glad to join an interesting challenge.
+1"The Aviator" is one of my favourite movies. Final H-4 scenes always give me goosebumps.
@WinsWings yep. I think I have something to join this with
+1@AfrizaSV sounds interesting. Maybe I'll try
+1T
@Zaineman I had a cold too recently. Winter sucks
@Zaineman everything's ok.
And how you doing?
@MobileBuilder21 thanks
@WinsWings thanks
@kaokaoo thanks
@CCCP0000001 yep, but I'm too dumb to make it. So I decided according to lore, soviets just bought western equipment.
+2@Vikram123 thanks.
@NormalCv580enjoyer these are actually the same names but differently transliterated
@Minexgamer I'm not taking requests. Sorry.
I'll try to join soon
@kaokaoo thanks
I wanna say only one thing...
ЁКАРНЫЙ БАБАЙ ЖМИ!!!
+7That is the livery I wanted to make. Unfortunately I had not enough skills to make it look better by that time
+2@Zaineman thanks
+1@MobileBuilder21 @WinsWings Thanks!
@Stinky almost all of Soviet planes have nato reporting names
@Boeing727200F it's because it's more loaded than average. I put it closer to center, for better maneuverability on ground.
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore nope
@TheOfficalMarylander actually it has interior only in the frontal part of fuselage.
If I did interior all fuselage long it would have approximately about 1700+ parts
@Blueshift Thanks
@NormalCv580enjoyer I tried to mix Yak-44 and An-28 and IL-112V
+1@ThePIanePerson Right now I'm making another project, but full parts IL-62 will be next after
It wasn't. It flew 3 months before Concorde. Except similar looking shape those two are really different designs. Tupolev is much bigger and heavier, It has engines much closer to the fuselage than Concorde has. And Tupolev has additional frontal folding stabilizers for flying at low speed.
+1The only reason they look similar is that supersonic aerodynamics works the same in the Soviet Union and in France
@Graingy Ilyushin's planes are known for relatively simple construction, and that makes them really reliable.
Unlike Tupolev's planes. Tupolev made really complicated designs, sometimes even ahead of its time (Like Tu-144). But on the other hand using cutting edge technologies made Tupolev's planes not so trustworthy like Ilyushin's planes. (First soviet jet airliner Tu-104 was a real disaster)
@Graingy actually no. They were quite reliable. Some of them fly even today, 60 years after first flight
@Vu1k4n0x those are not JATOs. Those are fuel tanks and landing legs
@WinsWings rejoining your challenge with proper version
+1@Thunderthud I'll call it IL-62SP
+3@NordicAerospace
ALL WE HAD TO DO WAS FOLLOW THE DAMN TRAIN CJ!
@WinsWings thanks!
@CR929thenewSPplayer I tried to make Tu-154, but it wasn't good. I couldn't make central air intake. It was pretty bad-looking.
Anyway I look forward to see it from you. Good luck with that.
@NordicAerospace It wasn't easy to fit in 96 parts, but still it's quite possible
@florky some new levers and some bug fixes, I haven't checked it out yet
@JP11 nothing. Steam updated my SimplePlanes automatically. And I don't know how to fix it
@NormalCv580enjoyer Thank you! My flight instructor once told me: "There's no better jet trainer than L-39 yet"
+1Since after that, this is my favourite airplane
сусемь)
@vonhubert давай, удачи
@vonhubert Привет! К сожалению, у меня сейчас мало времени остаётся на игру, поэтому, пока не смогу этим заняться. Однако, даю все карты в руки, если хочешь сделать что-то с этим Антеем, буду только рад посмотреть что получится
+1T
Are you planning to make Yak-130 from this?
+1@MrCOPTY thanks!
+1@WinsWings looking forward to see it!
+1@SkyJayTheFirst It's GigaChaded enough already
+1@WinsWings Thanks! That's my favourite airplane, and the best replica I've made by now, to my opinion. Canopy and fuselage shaping took me really long
+1Захват СимплПлейнс советской (ну почти))) техникой идет медленно, но верно
+2@Zaineman appreciate that, pal!
I always liked this plane. It's like what if MiG-21 and F-4 Phantom had a child
@Zilozite nice
T
@FeiGe3