@LeonardorHD1
Well, you can have a build that's below the part count, but depending on how much it's below the minimum requirement, it will get either a big point reduction (that also depends on how many parts it is below the minimum, I'll decide) or a disqualification if it's well below the minimum.
Very nice, I like it.
I watched Yarnhub's video on this tank and what it did in that ambush you mentioned, it's quite interesting to watch to be honest
@Sparky6004
Both aircraft can undertake Medical Evacuation, it's jus not their primary role or, I presume, not what they were initially designed for.
Just look at their wiki's.
@ZexkyHelicopters
If you're asking if an interior is required, it's not, but you get more points for making one (pretty helpful in the context of this challenge if you think about it).
Ok, I'll be very nice and accept this, but with a heavy point reduction.
@BangRou
Oh, the VR Build challenge?
@asteroidbook345
What challenge is it?
I think you're talking about caramelldansen.
+3If so, the lyrics you've put in the post are way off.
@2Papi2Chulo
+1You could use variables assigned to switches and buttons alongside AG's.
@asteroidbook345
Wait, I was being stupid and thinking you meant it in a different way.
@asteroidbook345
What do you even want that kind of curving on text for anyways?
@Simpleplaneplayer
Yes, and it's going to be disqualified for being too low in parts.
@CoolPeach
May I know how you made those aerial panning shots at the start?
@ReinMcDeer
If I choose to, do you mind if I use this in a video I'm planning to make?
@LeonardorHD1
That's not the point...
What you submit for the challenge should be the finished product.
Sorry, but I'm going to be disqualifying this entry as it's too far far below the minimum part count.
@SussyBreadBoi
I think a way you could make skis is to make cosmetic ones and then have very flat wheels under them that are the same colour.
@LeonardorHD1
Well, you can have a build that's below the part count, but depending on how much it's below the minimum requirement, it will get either a big point reduction (that also depends on how many parts it is below the minimum, I'll decide) or a disqualification if it's well below the minimum.
Nice work
@LieutenantSOT
+1Yes.
@LieutenantSOT
+1Probably a good idea if you're entering.
I would change the colour of the panel line as black doesn't look too good for that purpose.
Very nice, I like it.
+2I watched Yarnhub's video on this tank and what it did in that ambush you mentioned, it's quite interesting to watch to be honest
"yes its part of a challenge"
+1Which challenge, hm?
GGOOSSEE, NOOO!!
+1You can just use the Overload mod to easily edit XML properties, which is the easiest way.
Really clever, this.
+1Wow!
Would have been nice to see a Mach gauge, but eh, you can probably do that stuff with the Label.
+1I would say Number 1.
You know a Bug Report form for the beta exists, right?
@Sm10684
+1Do you want me to spam ping you..?
(Edit note: I'm not actually going to do that)
Yeah, and how much power is in those afterburners.
+5You're talking to one right here.
+10@Richflysplanes
This will be disqualified as the part count is too low.
Colour me impressed, well done 👍👏
I'll accept this entry, but you will be getting a point deduction for it being under 250 parts.
+2@FlyingPatriot
That...didn't really answer my question, but I'll take it.
Is this supposed to be a hypothetical where this thing didn't get abandoned in Antarctica?
@Sparky6004
Both aircraft can undertake Medical Evacuation, it's jus not their primary role or, I presume, not what they were initially designed for.
Just look at their wiki's.
Basically never.
@R3N13L
Yes, you're 190 parts under the minimum.
@LieutenantSOT
Well, I don't care if you make a gunship version of your build, just a medevac version, so go for it (or however you want to make it).
@NonameMini
Fixed.
@ZexkyHelicopters
And watch this video by Walvis for good thumbnail making.
@ZexkyHelicopters
+1If you're asking if an interior is required, it's not, but you get more points for making one (pretty helpful in the context of this challenge if you think about it).
I'm not an expert, but MrSilverWolf's SkyWolf 485A 'Caribou' would be a place to start.
Bloody love this, looks like a photograph IRL
I don't know why, but looking at the side, the LG looks kind of ugly (I got the same problem on one of my builds, so don't worry).
I'll take a look soon for you.
@jamesPLANESii
+2Yeah...that's the sort of thing you would see on a Gravestone if it's related to a person.....concerning :\
@HistoryNerd007
...what....
I got the correct code on my TA-78 AirShark's propeller if you want to copy it.
@CC1010
It's not...