@32
One major no-no is to try and sell creations as models or something. All the parts in-game are created by Jundroo and are thus their property. They are under a creative-commons licence, but trying to sell SP creations is violating that licence and if I've got it right, illegal too.
I had no idea there were any members of the P-39 family that were airworthy.
Shame one is now forever gone, along with the B-17.
An even more massive shame that lives were lost....
Very nice, but just a couple pointers.
1. The opposite platform looks weird compared to the one Thomas is at, looks like its sloping upwards instead of being level.
2. The people boarding Annie and Clarabel look too small.
@nmfy
This is a cool aircraft, but I have some pointers for you regarding the website section.
First, you shouldn't be saying "GIVE ME AN UP! Please!" in the description (or really at all) as it's actually a violation of the site rules.
Next, not really something you need to do, but it's nice, is to give some actual info on the build other then the controls.
And a good thing to do is to add pictures to the description.
I wouldn't think so as they are only images, but I'm not an expert on Jundroo's Copyright rules, so I'll let someone who knows for definite answer this properly.
@L0RR3B0RR3
There's a little drop-down arrow in the description area right under the download button. Click that and there should be an option to 'Save to favourites'. You can access your favourites from your profile page.
@HololiveFan
What's your point?
They're two different aircraft, the top one still bears those extra livery details, the other one just doesn't.
But both are in the same base livery, which is the Airbus house livery for the Neo line.
AND, the first one just has image details in the 'Neo' on the tail fin. For example, if you look at the top of the 'N' on the right side, you'll see the Elizabeth Tower (or Big Ben as you'll probably know it).
@Reworkable
Surely it can't be. The first trailer for SimplePlanes on Jundroo's YT channel is far different then this. Plus, this has objects, like the modern prop engines and fuselage blocks that weren't there when the game first released.
It's probably not even the first trailer for mobile SP because I remember playing SP on mobile before these items were added.
@MAINE
Because it goes against the site rules. As far as I'm concerned, it counts as a Sympathy/Memorial post, which are only allowed in the Forums section.
I doubt any Mod is 'Anti-Ukraine', they're just doing what they're supposed to do.
Just as a thing for those being touchy on the fact it was 'just a joke', it depends on the context in my view. I don't really know what the joke was exactly, yes, but still, just don't make jokes on tragedies.
(Correct me if I'm wrong anywhere in this.)
Nice looking build, but a couple pointers.
- First, that thumbnail is just a bit too bright. Some sort of vignette of light on it. I would take that off so it doesn't look like there's a light-filled haze around the build.
- Second, some more pictures.
- Third, I'm sort of doubting if Trim is the only control, excluding the basic ones. IF it is, fine. If not, list the others.
Other then that, all good.
@Otana
Here's a tip for you.
If you're using the SP logo, try copying the logo on the website (top-left as you probably know). That's a transparent PNG image.
@TacticalFloppa
Just download it, then double click to open. Doing so will automatically open SP and it will bring up the Mods menu, where you can enable the mod.
@Cerdd
The solution is to keep collisions on the cannon and disable collisions on everything around the cannon or what the cannon is attached to/clipping though.
Wait....so unless I'm missing something....you got told told to step-down from a 'position', but you don't know what that position is...?
+12No, it's not a Zepplin, it's an Australian Submarine.
+12@32
+11One major no-no is to try and sell creations as models or something. All the parts in-game are created by Jundroo and are thus their property. They are under a creative-commons licence, but trying to sell SP creations is violating that licence and if I've got it right, illegal too.
You're talking to one right here.
+10Ok, wow.
+8This is most definitely a mod that should be put into the game.
I saw "Slew Mode" and I thought of FSX Steam edition, lol.
+8@HariTheSnakk
+7Something like this though would be pretty heavy on a mobile device.
@MrSilverWolf
+7It's been known for ages that it takes many goat sacrifices to please Andrew and become a Mod.
@SkullKid25
+6You need to be around SP for a bit longer to understand this one. It's basically the biggest meme in this community.
"VTOLs generally don't have burners"
+6Well, the F-35B does (The B variant is the VTOL version).
I don't think I've noticed this, but now you mention it, it probably would be a good idea to remove/change it
+6May the crew of both aircraft be at peace.
+5(Also Teyvat, in reference to the notes, good luck on your journey.)
I had no idea there were any members of the P-39 family that were airworthy.
+5Shame one is now forever gone, along with the B-17.
An even more massive shame that lives were lost....
Very nice, but just a couple pointers.
1. The opposite platform looks weird compared to the one Thomas is at, looks like its sloping upwards instead of being level.
2. The people boarding Annie and Clarabel look too small.
Over then that, very well done.
+5Still working on mine...
+5TheDesignate
+5Sorry, but I'll have to disqualify this due to the part count being too low.
Neato 👍
+5(Also, trailer making hurts for me since like, everyone else has powerful computers, so it actually looks nice ;-;)
November (19th to be really exact, apparently) is International Men's day.
+5@nmfy
+5This is a cool aircraft, but I have some pointers for you regarding the website section.
First, you shouldn't be saying "GIVE ME AN UP! Please!" in the description (or really at all) as it's actually a violation of the site rules.
Next, not really something you need to do, but it's nice, is to give some actual info on the build other then the controls.
And a good thing to do is to add pictures to the description.
I wouldn't think so as they are only images, but I'm not an expert on Jundroo's Copyright rules, so I'll let someone who knows for definite answer this properly.
+5Nice shark mouth.
+5Also, am I the only one who still doesn't know how to use that code?
Yeah, and how much power is in those afterburners.
+5@asteroidbook345
+5Who knows if it will even happen, let alone soon.
Dunno about you, but I'm a little concerned at this point :\
@L0RR3B0RR3
+4There's a little drop-down arrow in the description area right under the download button. Click that and there should be an option to 'Save to favourites'. You can access your favourites from your profile page.
@HololiveFan
+4What's your point?
They're two different aircraft, the top one still bears those extra livery details, the other one just doesn't.
But both are in the same base livery, which is the Airbus house livery for the Neo line.
AND, the first one just has image details in the 'Neo' on the tail fin. For example, if you look at the top of the 'N' on the right side, you'll see the Elizabeth Tower (or Big Ben as you'll probably know it).
Jesus...how many german corsairs have their been now..
+4@asteroidbook345
+4Yes, a gearbox on a steam locomotive, which doesn't have a gearbox.
@Reworkable
+4Surely it can't be. The first trailer for SimplePlanes on Jundroo's YT channel is far different then this. Plus, this has objects, like the modern prop engines and fuselage blocks that weren't there when the game first released.
It's probably not even the first trailer for mobile SP because I remember playing SP on mobile before these items were added.
What KDnotSpy said.
+4Why 'leave' SP, when you can just not play it...
+4Why do I fee like this was all one massive practical joke...?
+4🤔
@MAINE
+4Because it goes against the site rules. As far as I'm concerned, it counts as a Sympathy/Memorial post, which are only allowed in the Forums section.
I doubt any Mod is 'Anti-Ukraine', they're just doing what they're supposed to do.
@JuanNotAnAlt
+4Already driving. Dunno about other countries, but you can legally drive from 17 in Britain.
Just as a thing for those being touchy on the fact it was 'just a joke', it depends on the context in my view. I don't really know what the joke was exactly, yes, but still, just don't make jokes on tragedies.
+4(Correct me if I'm wrong anywhere in this.)
@Kennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneth
+4Bruh, Jundroo really should hire the people who make these things at this point as Devs.
@KorporatsiyaLK
+3Yes, I do state in the rules and regulations you can make your entry fictional or a replica.
So cursed.
+3But why the four engines..
Nice looking build, but a couple pointers.
+3- First, that thumbnail is just a bit too bright. Some sort of vignette of light on it. I would take that off so it doesn't look like there's a light-filled haze around the build.
- Second, some more pictures.
- Third, I'm sort of doubting if Trim is the only control, excluding the basic ones. IF it is, fine. If not, list the others.
Other then that, all good.
And asteroidbook, I know Britain's Monarch doesn't work off age, it's more complicated.
+3@Otana
+3Here's a tip for you.
If you're using the SP logo, try copying the logo on the website (top-left as you probably know). That's a transparent PNG image.
@TacticalFloppa
+3Just download it, then double click to open. Doing so will automatically open SP and it will bring up the Mods menu, where you can enable the mod.
Didn't really see much of him, but R.I.P anyhow.
+3(Also, no offense at all, but don't be surprised if this gets taken down.)
Can I do the thing?
+3Requested tags:
+3@Dastin
@shibusu
@Sakorsky
I would, if I could. I live in Britain though.
+3Holy s**t
+3I see you've sacrificed enough goats.
+3My questions is, why?
+3What are the Russians getting out of destroying it....
@Kangy
+3I do try to do that.
@Cerdd
+3The solution is to keep collisions on the cannon and disable collisions on everything around the cannon or what the cannon is attached to/clipping though.