@Ventus @JoshuaW dont give josh a hard time vents ;), i think the current unity engine and sp are only as good as android 4, is extremely buggy and its not his fault nor responsibility to engineer around to make things work along a faulty environment
@GuyFolk @JoshuaW of cos tvc can do better than control surfaces, i had experirment with tvc to the extend that even my bricks can fly pretty well. so i came to accept the challenge of making non tvc planes for 2 reasons.
1) i should make planes that can actually perform decently without tvc, since i had made ones that i cant consider as planes
2) making non tvc planes to fly like one is hard or near impossible and therefore itself is the definition of a challenge lol
@ZeroWithSlashedO excellent potential on this one.
the style is also mcot.
i am EXTREMELY tempted to make a successor and a definitive improved version to this, just to see it whoop a$$
@GuyFolk "good at locking the nose where u left it?" u are the guy who made planes that taught me exactly how to do this 3 weeks after i joined. lol. now i am totally happy with the 8 months after that.
@Ownedpilot a programmed learning capability on funky trees?
i think it can read input and outputs but learning to do what next? i am interested.
btw i can also read chinese
@JoshuaW "Might be the most complex (and the best) fly-by-wire programm in this game so far (glad to be proved wrong)."
@GuyFolk i have to agree with guyfolk this is a top tier, but i think it's not the most complex.
it is definitely not the most complex:
until you try to achieve what u can do with a tvc... *without a tvc",
and then without a tail ;))
i have been spending weeks and months on a wip that does that.
it's not completed yet but it's about 95% complete i would say
i havent upload the wip yet, it also carries a variation of the excellent auto camo u made. i love it
but then i took it to next level ;)
@ChiChiWerx i remember they had this in Microsoft flight sim 4.0 or earlier.
one of my favorite planes back then
a joy to fly on the older flight sim
too bad we werent able to code anything fbw in those older flight sims.
otherwise i probably couldve made my fbw'ed x-29 at age 15
actually my automatic camouflage build is near completion.
it also comes with an automatic missile avoidance technology
and probably the best looking afterburner on sp
@TheSarge same, i also have a plane that is in the last stage just like yours. i just can't say how much fun i am having while doing this. joy to you too :)
when u say angle it, do you mean in the roll axis or the pitch axis.
actually this is totally the point of having an anhedral wing especially when u are rolling. with respect to the airflow that one wing parallel to the ground have in full effect of lift against the gravity, while the lowered wing has less lift with respect to gravity. this is why the early to pre-fly by wire period planes like f-4, harrier and f-16 all have some lifting surfaces in anhedreal configuration to promote agility, and are famous for relatively viffy and flipply moves.
u can try promoting the anhedral lifting surface to mount higher than the plane this will kind of balance the plane with pendulum effect and the plane will be more usable. like a hang glider and harrier.
i kinda made this without using a mod.
but that work is unlisted on a wip. let me know if anyone want to use it
next:
funkytree incognito
i am now waiting for spos
or funkytreeos
t
@Ventus @JoshuaW dont give josh a hard time vents ;), i think the current unity engine and sp are only as good as android 4, is extremely buggy and its not his fault nor responsibility to engineer around to make things work along a faulty environment
+1this livery reminds me of my earlier beloved plane
+1u need to make that wuling logo ;)
i told people even a brick with tvc can fly pretty well
+1this is why i switch back to making non tvc planes
at least they are planes
@JoshuaW well done!
ps: i feel perplexed when i see pi in the code. hehe
+1@GuyFolk @JoshuaW of cos tvc can do better than control surfaces, i had experirment with tvc to the extend that even my bricks can fly pretty well. so i came to accept the challenge of making non tvc planes for 2 reasons.
+11) i should make planes that can actually perform decently without tvc, since i had made ones that i cant consider as planes
2) making non tvc planes to fly like one is hard or near impossible and therefore itself is the definition of a challenge lol
@ZeroWithSlashedO excellent potential on this one.
the style is also mcot.
i am EXTREMELY tempted to make a successor and a definitive improved version to this, just to see it whoop a$$
@GuyFolk "good at locking the nose where u left it?" u are the guy who made planes that taught me exactly how to do this 3 weeks after i joined. lol. now i am totally happy with the 8 months after that.
+1@Ownedpilot a programmed learning capability on funky trees?
+1i think it can read input and outputs but learning to do what next? i am interested.
btw i can also read chinese
@JoshuaW "Might be the most complex (and the best) fly-by-wire programm in this game so far (glad to be proved wrong)."
@GuyFolk i have to agree with guyfolk this is a top tier, but i think it's not the most complex.
+1it is definitely not the most complex:
until you try to achieve what u can do with a tvc... *without a tvc",
and then without a tail ;))
i have been spending weeks and months on a wip that does that.
it's not completed yet but it's about 95% complete i would say
i havent upload the wip yet, it also carries a variation of the excellent auto camo u made. i love it
but then i took it to next level ;)
love this
+1this is awesome.
+1not too shabby has a lot of potentials
@MAINE the design matters quite a bit. seen plenty of builds but i can tell some geometric setup works better than the others. personally i like the av-8 harrier type. i like it quite a bit more than most of the newer american carrier jets. if u want something that works right out of the box u can try this excellent front gear from bogdanx, on his meteor
@PlanariaLab well done.
the programming helped me to complete one of the desired function of my wip plane.
@Strikefighter04 thats until one of your trucks go transformer
+2a cockpit is never complete without a face.
now this one gets my approval
+1@ChiChiWerx i remember they had this in Microsoft flight sim 4.0 or earlier.
one of my favorite planes back then
a joy to fly on the older flight sim
too bad we werent able to code anything fbw in those older flight sims.
otherwise i probably couldve made my fbw'ed x-29 at age 15
1 year later: funky photoshop
+85 years later: funky OS
have seen tons of tvc psm planes.
out of all these planes this one handles rather nicely
t
perfect monster jam platform
+2flying nicely only subjects to "fly by wire creativity", i think this exact same plane can fly a lot better than this
@WinsWings i tried to pull that visibleInDesigner false trick on one of my planes and it didn't work i wondered why
best usage (or lack of usage) of the variable setter ever.
+2waiting for glowing solar system
actually my automatic camouflage build is near completion.
+1it also comes with an automatic missile avoidance technology
and probably the best looking afterburner on sp
unfortunately, dragonair is now defunct.
might as well make this one a memorial build.. lol
+1awesome welldone
your first jet is INCREDIBLE...!!!
+1keep it up u can beat almost everyone on SP building jets
i wish i can totally hide the projectile during the game.
so i can make it tracer only and looking like a turbo laser
T
love rng.
best thing that could happen to any sandbox
@hpgbproductions i made a small change to your afterburner funky, enjoy!
<size=200%><color=#1820FF><mspace=0.089em><line-height=73%>{sin(Time*7000)>0 & AbActive>0.9 ? "<alpha=#20>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
+6" : ""}{AbActive>0.75 ? "<line-height=73%><alpha=#15>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
" : ""}{AbActive>0.6 ? "<line-height=73%><alpha=#0E>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
" : ""}{AbActive>0.45 ? "<line-height=73%><alpha=#08>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
" : ""}{AbActive>0.2 ? "<line-height=73%><alpha=#04>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
" : ""}{AbActive>0.05 ? "<line-height=73%><alpha=#02>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
" : ""}
@Aerozack did u even hit play
your death star is drunk
@TheSarge same, i also have a plane that is in the last stage just like yours. i just can't say how much fun i am having while doing this. joy to you too :)
+1biggest full surface rudder on sp
+1@xNotDumb bunch of vtol nozzles
when u say angle it, do you mean in the roll axis or the pitch axis.
actually this is totally the point of having an anhedral wing especially when u are rolling. with respect to the airflow that one wing parallel to the ground have in full effect of lift against the gravity, while the lowered wing has less lift with respect to gravity. this is why the early to pre-fly by wire period planes like f-4, harrier and f-16 all have some lifting surfaces in anhedreal configuration to promote agility, and are famous for relatively viffy and flipply moves.
u can try promoting the anhedral lifting surface to mount higher than the plane this will kind of balance the plane with pendulum effect and the plane will be more usable. like a hang glider and harrier.
T
+1@Darg12e psm without tvc, exactly my cup of tea and i know how much more complicated it is to do than using tvc
+2why scrapping this fuselage? looks like a good one to me
i just found out that my near perfect tailless plane has over 1000 parts. boomer.
i have a feeling i m gonna make a simplistic x-29 out of this build
+2i would give it a 20 out of 10 if the fire isnt coming from the carb. lol
+3