I believe the Germans didn't receive the chance to destroy them. The two prototypes were the Alpha, with turret and armament, and the Beta, simply a hull. The Alpha chassis had some structural/steering problems, so the Ruskies that captured them put the Alpha turret on the Beta body to test it. It's currently in a Russian tank museum.
Hi, I'm here to tell you a few things. First, your plane violates site rules by using a Youtuber as a plane name. Change it or delete the aircraft. Second, your plane is an acknowledged copy of an existing plane, intended for malicious intent. Give the original creator credit.
@Skua @MaleticAirplanes I have used side floats, and have a high to low buoyancy gradient from front to back, and small stabilizers underneath, yet it still refuses water transport. Maybe the CoT is too high, it's a high wing parasol design, with engine pods, rear facing, under the wings on pylons.
Hey, i'm here to tell you that your plane is against some of the site rules. You cannot have a Youtuber's name in the title, and you need to either change the name or remove the plane. If you want Jacksepticeye to see your creation, you need to use the tag system. I recommend you read over the rules.
Hey, i'm here to tell you that your plane is against the site rules. Planes cannot have Youtuber names in the title, so you need to either change the name, or take down the plane. I recommend reading through the rules as well.
@Typhlosion130 The VTOL unit problem was been solved by the addition of a second unit. I didn't want the jet to be extremely fast, just realistically so.
@Typhlosion130 Exactly. The problem with it is that I cannot test VTOL jets. I'm making a new VTOL ground attack craft, and the stock VTOL unit was too weak. I had a modded one, but I didn't know how much power it made. Nonetheless, it achieved orbit 700,000 feet above the ground at 32,000 miles per hour.
@Typhlosion130 I understand, I was using this method to review engines for my Meteor, and some got up to speed quicker than others, but then slowed down as the other engine gained power.
Mine is one I made in half an hour out of foam board, duct tape, wood dowels, and a crashed Spitfire. The electronics were fine, and I didn't know how to make a proper airfoil, yet it flies.
This plane goes against the rules regarding naming one's plane. Jelly will be much more likely to see it if you change the name and use the tag system.
Another one? Really? There are no haters. What's happening is people are stealing our planes and say that they made them for this Jelly guy. All we are is mad that our hard made content is being stolen.
I believe the Germans didn't receive the chance to destroy them. The two prototypes were the Alpha, with turret and armament, and the Beta, simply a hull. The Alpha chassis had some structural/steering problems, so the Ruskies that captured them put the Alpha turret on the Beta body to test it. It's currently in a Russian tank museum.
I love forward swept wings. They're unconventional, yet so good looking.
Hi, I'm here to tell you a few things. First, your plane violates site rules by using a Youtuber as a plane name. Change it or delete the aircraft. Second, your plane is an acknowledged copy of an existing plane, intended for malicious intent. Give the original creator credit.
Hey, I'm here to tell you that your plane's violations site rules. You cannot have a Youtuber's name as a plane name. Please change it or remove it.
You don't mind if I use this chassis, do you?
@Pilotmario No problem.
You have done nothing but change the colour. Give the original creator credit.
@Delphinus Thanks, I dislike extremely repetitive designs, and like to shake it up with something different.
@Skua @MaleticAirplanes I have used side floats, and have a high to low buoyancy gradient from front to back, and small stabilizers underneath, yet it still refuses water transport. Maybe the CoT is too high, it's a high wing parasol design, with engine pods, rear facing, under the wings on pylons.
@Techindustries The site's rules dictate that you cannot put a Youtuber's name in the title. You've changed it, so you're fine now.
@Skua Alright
The Enzo Ferrari by Enzo Ferrari.
@Skua On that topic, what criteria should we use? there's nothing for "against youtuber naming rule" or "other"
Hey, i'm here to tell you that your plane is against some of the site rules. You cannot have a Youtuber's name in the title, and you need to either change the name or remove the plane. If you want Jacksepticeye to see your creation, you need to use the tag system. I recommend you read over the rules.
Hey, i'm here to tell you that your plane is against the site rules. Planes cannot have Youtuber names in the title, so you need to either change the name, or take down the plane. I recommend reading through the rules as well.
@TheGuyWhoFliesToGetHisPie The Bachem Ba 349 "Natter"
@SPS13 I always had an itching to make a morbid aircraft.
@Waffle101 If that's the purpose, why tell people not to download it?
@Typhlosion130 The VTOL unit problem was been solved by the addition of a second unit. I didn't want the jet to be extremely fast, just realistically so.
@Typhlosion130 how would one compare VTOL units, anyways?
@Typhlosion130 Exactly. The problem with it is that I cannot test VTOL jets. I'm making a new VTOL ground attack craft, and the stock VTOL unit was too weak. I had a modded one, but I didn't know how much power it made. Nonetheless, it achieved orbit 700,000 feet above the ground at 32,000 miles per hour.
But it's still the same length...
@Typhlosion130 I understand, I was using this method to review engines for my Meteor, and some got up to speed quicker than others, but then slowed down as the other engine gained power.
@Typhlosion130 I was thinking of using a rotary stand, each engine trying to turn it the opposite way.
@Typhlosion130 Interesting. Could you run a few tests for me?
About how much stronger is it than stock?
@Halfstrike I tried an armin wing, but I couldn't get the board to do what I wanted.
I remember watching you get silver, I was the upvote that pushed you into it.
Mine is one I made in half an hour out of foam board, duct tape, wood dowels, and a crashed Spitfire. The electronics were fine, and I didn't know how to make a proper airfoil, yet it flies.
The maneuverability! Holy crap!
First
Also, I suspect some trickery. Let's see what you're up to.
Top speed?
This plane goes against the rules regarding naming one's plane. Jelly will be much more likely to see it if you change the name and use the tag system.
@TheGuyWhoFliesToGetHisPie Thanks. I was somewhat unhappy with how the first one turned out, and felt I could put more into it. So I did.
@deusalgor Thanks, i'll give ya credit.
Hey, would you mind if i used some engines in my re-made Meteor?
Hey, i'm afraid it's against the rules to make names regarding Youtubers. Please change the name and use the tag system.
I like the stories you attach to the planes, i try to add a bit of background to my own planes, but its nothing like what you can come up with.
Build a bipe, tripe, quipe, flying Venetian blind.
Se what you can get to takeoff under 250 hp
Top speed?
'Fraid you're not the fastest. If you wanna go faster, try out my ACAW Meteor, and use the engines it has.
this is in direct violation of the rules regarding Youtubers. Change the name or the Moderators will deal with it.
You have stolen this plane. Give the creator credit.
Another one? Really? There are no haters. What's happening is people are stealing our planes and say that they made them for this Jelly guy. All we are is mad that our hard made content is being stolen.
@DeezDucks A double edged sword implies we harm them.
Roham, this is not your plane, you did not make it. Give the owner credit.
This is not your plane. Give the maker of the plane credit. It is extremely obvious you did not make this.
@Delphinus Cool, I didn't know you categorized things like that. I'll check them out.
@Delphinus I've noticed you build all sorts of large planes,and they're all very nice, but have you ever wondered how small you can go?
Nicely done, a well agile fighter with positive characteristics.