@Sunnyskies I know it's the Globemaster III, I just didn't title the forum post that for clickbait purposes XD
But thanks! I've been inside a c-17 twice, and it's my favorite aircraft of all time.
@BogdanX I think you can get up to 80% exact in shape. Functionality, performance, and detail wise are impossible to even get close to the real thing. My hawker is probably 1% exact XD
Sometimes it's hard to make universally good physics for a game where each plane is made up of 500 different circles and squares glued together. Also, for you to test how realistic sp is compared to the movie sully, you would have to have a plane on sp with the exact same weight, size, shape, drag, engine thrust, lift, and so on and so forth, of the real thing. I'm sure the physics are the best they can be for such a complex building game
@Gestour gotta go fast
I know this is supposed to be wolfs and dogs but could I be Sonic the Hedgehog pls
You should make an X-32.
Or the GL 10 Greased Lightning
Dat boi is back
@JMicah4 yea, you wanna test?
@MrWarPac probably 1500. 1700 if I put a tank inside
@Harambe that sucks :/
@Harambe
Thx
@TrainDude
Lol
@Sauce calm down bud, no hate speech please
@iSauce lots and lots
@TheHorribleAncientShade ?
@503rdAirborneSoldier as long as you credit me
@Sauce True. Only iFalco has the skill to do that
Finally, I can detach my cockpits more easily
@InternationalAircraftCompany no, TheLatentImage made a post about it.
@503rdAirborneSoldier the wingspan and length are about twice as much as this one XD
Aren't we supposed to post w.i.p.s any more?
@Seeras
@TheLatentImage
@TAplanes awesome! I haven't made any cargo planes in a while, but I'm making a c-17 globemaster right now
@InternationalAircraftCompany yea why?
@MRstadlles I won't build part of the plane for you, since it is better for you to learn yourself. If you have any questions I can help though
@TAplanes
Thanks for all the upvotes! Did you just discover my account?
Download iruler.
+13It lets you download mods easily on ios
C if it'll be 1:1
I made one a while ago, it doesn't have all the functions of the real plane but it is the most realistic looking in my opinion.
@Supercraft888 it's only about 550 so far
@Sunnyskies awesome, I'll tag you. If there are any details I should add, let me know
@Sunnyskies part count's about 550 right now
@Sunnyskies I know it's the Globemaster III, I just didn't title the forum post that for clickbait purposes XD
But thanks! I've been inside a c-17 twice, and it's my favorite aircraft of all time.
@KingDeadshot @BaconAircraft Thanks!
Bacon, tag me in your dc-10
Your parent took you out to dinner instead of letting you play video games all day?
Evil bastards
I agree 100%
@BogdanX I think you can get up to 80% exact in shape. Functionality, performance, and detail wise are impossible to even get close to the real thing. My hawker is probably 1% exact XD
@BogdanX what are you talking about it is 100% exact. Down to every nut and bolt
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Woah let's not overreact buddy
"100% historically accurate"
dies inside
@Kevinairlines you should really focus on using blueprints to make the plane look as exact as possible
@Kevinairlines lol
@Kevinairlines ok, I don't even know what happened
@Kevinairlines did it get removed again?
@Gestour
nice
Sometimes it's hard to make universally good physics for a game where each plane is made up of 500 different circles and squares glued together. Also, for you to test how realistic sp is compared to the movie sully, you would have to have a plane on sp with the exact same weight, size, shape, drag, engine thrust, lift, and so on and so forth, of the real thing. I'm sure the physics are the best they can be for such a complex building game
@Benkelmans lol I hate autocorrect
@Benkelmans It'll probably be my biggest plane yet lol
sigh
@Benkelmans yea
@Benkelmans XD
@Benkelmans yea, maybe after my current project
This blows my mind. I don't know how you managed to do this, but it's is amazing. This is the only plane of someone else's I've saved
Awesome