128k L1nus Comments

  • Are You Serious Right Now!? 11 months ago

    @SILVERPANZER That would be Baller if this was all just simulation

  • Soldat Crinale 2005 11 months ago

    Not very realistic suspension

  • The Holy Trinity of Hypercars 11 months ago

    do you not know how to do image posting instead of linking it
    Just write ![](Image link)

  • Comically low quality ACA Allertor 125 11 months ago

    remind me of the one tiktok Guy who made siren noises with his voice

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @NordicAerospace hope you enjoy the aircraft

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    yesterday was it's 50th anniversary because iran still uses them

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @NordicAerospace 1974 September 22nd was when she went into service as well, yes i did do this intentionally

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @AjRenegade it's intended to be flown from the Pilot cockpit, there is no RIO functionality as i made sure all controls can be used in the front cockpit

  • 100K!!!!!!!! 11 months ago

    One of Us, One of Us

    +2
  • Are You Serious Right Now!? 11 months ago

    @AWESOMENESS360 Have you seen the Twitter bot groups? it's whole network of bots that actually respond to each other to create fake engagement with Ai made identities of people that don't exist.

    +2
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @CaptainBrayden thanks mate

  • Are You Serious Right Now!? 11 months ago

    If you really want to feel scared look up the dead internet theory

    +8
  • Tupolev Tu-4 Superfortresski “Bull” 11 months ago

    is that the Gulag Express?

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 11 months ago

    @Stephen22 ngl i might update it and add 2 more parts just to be on the nose about it

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @Timplanes The F-14 was designed to break it's wings for you lol

    +3
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    Celebrate 50 years of service from the F-14 Tomcat 1974-2024

  • T 11 months ago

    do people not know how to screenshot on desktop? also that set up is mad dusty

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @TheAerospacecraftNerd77 FunFact: TF-30s made F-14 As have better TTWR than An F-14 D. The Top Speed record was set on an A model clean

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 11 months ago

    @SPsidearm 4 dilla

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 11 months ago

    @Rjenteissussy lol

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @Christiant2 Thank you i spent about a year and a half working on this design

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @BYardley

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @TatsuTheOtaku
    @TheNewSPplayer
    @CaptainNoble

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @IceCraftGaming
    @TemporaryReplacement
    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @Randomplayer
    @TheMouse
    @Nj364

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 11 months ago

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
    @Marulk
    @crazyplaness

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 11 months ago

    @BYardley

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 11 months ago

    @TatsuTheOtaku
    @TheNewSPplayer
    @CaptainNoble

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 11 months ago

    @IceCraftGaming
    @TemporaryReplacement
    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 11 months ago

    @Randomplayer
    @TheMouse
    @Nj364

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 11 months ago

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
    @Marulk
    @crazyplaness

  • bye have a great time 11 months ago

    "in case i don't see yeah, Good morning, and in case I don't see ya, good afternoon, good evening, and goodnight!"

  • MiG-29SM one year ago

    What's up with the front gear?

    +1
  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    @Aga2003 accelerates littel to fast, like 200 knots in a few seconds. Handling is what you'd expect from this kinda plane

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    Simple way to put it is if people like it. People download

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    @Aga2003 oh so you are trying to hide it from people so get more downloads.

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    Even the the performance cost is exactly the same regardless

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    @Graingy bro thinks disconnecting a cockpit from a 2000 part build compresses the file to 1 part and makes it run better

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    @Graingy get a load of this guy

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    Also why are you still going on about how I claimed its stolen when we've established it isnt, you're just dumb to think that disconnecting a cockpit would actually compress the file size, I can ask literally anyone else rn and they would tell you, you are wrong

  • XH-100 one year ago

    Love it man

    +1
  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    That's just really sad honestly

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    @Aga2003 I play mobile too lol, so what you're saying is you're intentionally hiding your part count of your builds to get more downloads, ask literally anyone else in this community and they will tell you that this doesn't work that way

  • F-15A (WIP 3) one year ago

    That looks really good, Tag me when it comes out

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    The reason you think this works is because it voids the check that the website makes for higher part creations, so when you disconnect the cockpit this warning for high part creations will not show because you made the website think it's only one part, I'm sure if you post this normally with the cockpit connected that the website will flag this as high part

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    my proof here, besides that if this really was a feature compress part counts. why aren't other people doing it. surely in the 10 years this game has existed someone would have already made awareness to this, i can also bet i've been playing this game longer than you

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    This build is still 2000 parts, the 1 part thing is just because the cockpit isn't connected to the build, the part count number is in relation to how many parts are connected to the cockpit, not how many parts are in the creation it's self. i can guarantee most mobile users can't run this because of it's performance cost. the performance cost is what you should focus on instead of the part count

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    Part count doesn't determine how a build runs, performance cost does

    +1
  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 one year ago

    @Aga2003 you realize the build is still at 2000 parts right? Disconnecting the cockpit does absolutely nothing. So in fact most people can't run this lmao

    +1