21.0k LieutenantSOT Comments

  • (Teaser) Baja Bruiser 1.7 years ago

    @PapaKernels XD no no no, I mean about me
    .
    But yeah!! I can't wait for this to come out!

  • Russian Cyrillic Isn't Recognized :( 1.7 years ago

    @JustWingIt damn lmao

  • Russian Cyrillic Isn't Recognized :( 1.7 years ago

    @SheriffHackdogMCPE "Zdravstvuyte, tovaritsh"
    Russian and French are the two languages I really want to learn lol
    .
    Yeahhhh I agree. It's really weird. I think these posts aren't made in HTML script, which would stop it, while comments are all under the Google engine

  • (Teaser) Baja Bruiser 1.7 years ago

    @PapaKernels notice something new?

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Jabuticaba23 ofc!

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Jabuticaba23 yeah!! That sounds amazing! Go for it!

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Snowdog no worries!

  • F-104C Starfighter 1.7 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer ikr!?
    Yeah, true 😂
    .
    But being able to fly into suborbital space? Showing it off at all the airports that can hold it? Hell yeah 😂
    .
    Probably be easier to have a joint ownership of it though

  • The last photo of Albatros ?? 1.7 years ago

    This is why I'm happy I have like 20 unlisted posts for every build I make
    .
    o7 that looked like a beautiful plane, lad 😭

    +1
  • cuctom wing 1.7 years ago

    This is really good!!!!

  • Bell's Grand Scheme 1.7 years ago

    @rexzion yeah! I've seen that one before. It's definitely out of place, but absolutely a fascinating concept!

  • Bell's Grand Scheme 1.7 years ago

    @Dathcha yes sirrrrr!

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 okay!! I'll check it out and see if its okay!
    .
    Okay! yes please! I'd love to see it!

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 no no, I got what you meant, I just meant I won't deduct points for it in the realism section of the scale
    It is smart to bring the thrust up tho lol
    .
    Okay! Sounds good!

  • Gloster Gladiator 1.7 years ago

    This is outstanding!!!

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 okay yeah!! That all sounds amazing! If you can get it close enough to realistic it's fine!
    .
    Some planes did experiment with 7000+ lbf engines in the late 40s, so I'll say it's okay!

  • Bell's Grand Scheme 1.7 years ago

    @rexzion my next build will have swept wings tho..

  • Bell's Grand Scheme 1.7 years ago

    @rexzion I was going to 😔
    I drew out the design like 20 times with different variants and this was the only way it looked natural. I debated doing B-36-like swept wings but ehhhhh

  • F-104C Starfighter 1.7 years ago

    Forgot to upvote this beauty a while ago!! This is sick!
    I saw one for sale on PlatinumFighters for $600,000. My god I wish I had $600,000 lmao

    +1
  • Ohio Flag (The 13th state) 1.7 years ago

    Good 'ole rocky top

  • Ohio Flag (The 13th state) 1.7 years ago

    Tennessee you'll always be home sweet home to meeeeeeeeeeee

  • Bell's Grand Scheme 1.7 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer *correction, it was 5 months ago
    time flies

    +1
  • Bell's Grand Scheme 1.7 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer woah! That was quick lol
    About a month or two ago, I think? I don't remember. I'm working on my pilot license rn, and I originally wanted to be a commissioned officer/Lieutenant in the USAF, but I dropped that and figured I'd change my name here too lol. I'm probably going to change it back though because people say they like the old one more

    +1
  • Bell's Grand Scheme 1.7 years ago

    I figured that my builds as of late have not been seen by many, so hey, here's a teaser!!
    .
    Also, this is my first build in a while that I have made without a true blueprint lol. I designed this bird myself and handdrew a blueprint, which I did copy most of it from the P-63, but the tail and nose and wings are my design. I don't have much left to add! My next build will be a big surprise though...

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 also, just a note, 550 knots is 632 mph, so that's the max speed your aircraft can reach

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 ooh awesome!! do try!

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Planebuilder2123 okay sick!
    .
    Yeah! As long as you get it to look okay, I don't mind. I only put that limit to keep the people who... err... put minimal effort in, out 😂
    I know you've got it tho!
    .
    And yeah! That's okay. Just try to keep it subsonic, preferably around 580 max

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    Sorry mate

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Snowdog oof 😬

  • Vought F4U-1D Corsair 1.7 years ago

    This is absolutely outstanding dude!!!

    +1
  • Guess the Fuse and COMING TOMORROW! 1.7 years ago

    P-63 Kingcobra
    .
    There are actually 3-ish planes with that fuselage: the P-63, the P-39, and the lesser-known P.400
    .
    Looks great dude!

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Snowdog ohhh okay! Cool!

  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    @Snowdog sick!!

  • North American AT-6 Texan (Plat special) 1.7 years ago

    @PapaKernels it's no poo poo

    +1
  • Made for testing my wings 1.7 years ago

    Another solution to the nose dip, is firstly increase the wing area (if you want, you could make the wings inside bigger, and then scale down), and then make the engines lower down to counteract the center of lift

  • Made for testing my wings 1.7 years ago

    There are multiple issues I can point out, if you'd like:
    .
    1. The center of mass should be around the same y-coordinate as the center of lift. Having it that far down makes it act funky
    2. The wings are far too short and stubby for this aircraft. To make this aircraft effectively work, you should have a longer wingspan, more wing area, and a weird and rare need, more weight. The jets are far too powerful, although bringing their thrust down with XML should help out (divide the wanted thrust by the thrust the engines produce)
    3. Those are nice fuselage wings for your first ones!! Splendid job! The ailerons should be put more towards the tip of the wing for maximal effect, but they still work okay
    4. Those elevators are something else...
    5. Overall, pretty decent for your first fuselage wings! If you'd like, I will link one of my older builds if you want to look at the wings and test it out to help you make yours! I'm not sure what these wings will be going on for the final product, but hey! Coming along great!
    .
    Link to plane: CLICKY

  • Made for testing my wings 1.7 years ago

    So ehm... I tried flying it

  • The roll on rotators is only going up 1.7 years ago

    Okay, cool!!

  • The roll on rotators is only going up 1.7 years ago

    @U2 yes please!

  • The roll on rotators is only going up 1.7 years ago

    Typically when you rotate a rotator, both should either be inverted yes, or inverted no, but they should both be the same, as mirroring causes them to switch to be opposites, and you need them to be the same to correctly roll

  • The roll on rotators is only going up 1.7 years ago

    @U2 have you inverted one of the rotators?

  • The roll on rotators is only going up 1.7 years ago

    heh? what's happening?

  • GA-8 1.7 years ago

    CLICKY
    By any chance, would you like to participate in my challenge? You don't have to, of course lol. Just my shameless promotions

  • GA-8 1.7 years ago

    This is super cool, dude!

  • YFM-1B Bell Airacuda 1.7 years ago

    @TrojanAircraftSystems yeah! Thank you bro!
    Sorry for the delayed response lmao.
    .
    By any chance, do you have discord?

  • Physics question about power 1.7 years ago

    @Javiatrix oh sick!!! Thanks for the info dude!
    .
    They really need to add variable parts to the engines. Like modifying the acceleration of the engine, exhaust fumes, and accurate changing of the MAXIMUM power of the engine 😂
    Like afterburner and military power are completely different things. Milpow is normal thrust 0-100, and afterburner/reheat is like 120, or more modern, like 150%
    The game is super simple trying to be complex and it doesnt work out well lol

    +1
  • Physics question about power 1.7 years ago

    No no Ik! I was agreeing with you, in a badly phrased way

  • Physics question about power 1.7 years ago

    @Javiatrix ofc dude!
    Yeahhhh SP be a bit weird sometimes lol

  • Physics question about power 1.7 years ago

    But SP in entirety is utterly... erm... disproportionate and poor in calculating sometimes