@EternalDarkness The SR-71 has ramjets, but can take off on it's own, because it uses a turboramjet. Similarly, the SR-72 will utilize a turboscramjet.
@MimicFlight Try doing Shift + Q, W, E, A, S, D. Q and E is moving along the roll axis, W and S are along the yaw axis, and A and D is along the pitch axis
@Hyperloop It happens usually because of 3 things. One, imbalanced weight, usually insignificant if making replicas. Two, imbalanced lift. Three, imbalanced thrust. The last two you have to pay attention to, though number three is very rare. Two is very common either because of one wing being larger, different angles, or different airfoils.
This is the plane you say flies like a charm. You say landing it is easy. Actually, it is more stressful to land airliners because the passengers are in your hands, and one wrong move means you lose the job.
Sure, it's a stealth fighter. NOT!!! First off, it's faceted, like the F-117 Nighthawk. Nowadays, they prefer smoother ones. Because it's faceted, there is more drag. (5187, mine is only 3921, 3462 minus the landing gear) Also, it's not so very appealing to the eye either. Not even the coloring makes it a stealth fighter. And no BVR too. I think it's only advantage is it's agility and speed, as well as it's ability to perform Short Take-offs. Other than that, mine is overall better.
@Athaya oh...
@EternalDarkness The SR-71 has ramjets, but can take off on it's own, because it uses a turboramjet. Similarly, the SR-72 will utilize a turboscramjet.
@Athaya Build a scramjet
Last I saw, the Phantom II's wings don't have dog tooths.
Mine is stable all throughout. Low alt, high alt, stable. 3600-7675 mph for mine.
@MimicFlight Try doing Shift + Q, W, E, A, S, D. Q and E is moving along the roll axis, W and S are along the yaw axis, and A and D is along the pitch axis
@FlyingThings https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4n0WH6/F-47-Liberty-v-0-5
@Thomasj041 Top speed?
@Thomasj041 What is the highest achieved top speed? Definitely not Mach 10 (I outran it)
@BogdanX Just like all engines (except rockets and ion engines)
A Horten Ho-18 rip-off. But good.
@ComplicatedPlanes Yes???
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4n0WH6/F-47-Liberty-v-0-5
No control surface
@Fishbowl1121 Then you should have read "I have made one for simple comparison".
And I have proof. Link: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/vEdfKe/Hypersonic-Scramjet-Fighter
@Fishbowl1121 Did you read?
I did it by using my F-16 to shoot the missiles before they hit me. I saved the real location afterward. Took me a few weeks to find the default one.
Last I saw, Self-Destruct is only eject on my F-47 Liberty
@MrMecha Oh, sry.
@ComplicatedPlanes I will usually be on at UTC 11:00 PM to 2:30 AM
@Hyperloop It happens usually because of 3 things. One, imbalanced weight, usually insignificant if making replicas. Two, imbalanced lift. Three, imbalanced thrust. The last two you have to pay attention to, though number three is very rare. Two is very common either because of one wing being larger, different angles, or different airfoils.
@JBOSSPRODOG say "text in between"
@BaconEggs It still has the weight of it.
@BaconEggs A B-52 has parachutes.
Feanor, can you at least try to build a BVR fighter?
@BaconEggs Oh yeah, my plane has a chute.
This is the plane you say flies like a charm. You say landing it is easy. Actually, it is more stressful to land airliners because the passengers are in your hands, and one wrong move means you lose the job.
Um, 6th gen fighters have EMP, anti-missile lasers, and whatnot.
@MechWARRIOR57 Clearly if you see "Before I submit", you can tell he is going to compare.
@MechWARRIOR57 Next time, read the entire post twice.
@MechWARRIOR57 That is not the point. I want another one comparable to the one I am already building.
@Delphinus For a final fighter test.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/ow5cm7/F-47-Liberty-version-0-2
@Rugpeersdude M.E.A.N. An acronym.
Yeah. For M.E.A.N. I saw it early at my 7:00AM.
@Feanor I am active. Go on.
Hey, Tully, care to join me?
@Tully2001 It's not mine
@Tully2001 yes it is.
Mind you be active? Also, why didn't you take me out with that last time?
tnx, @Feanor
@Racrandall I am active every weekday, UTC 11 PM - 2:30 AM
@Tully2001 @MonsterSlayer @EliteIndustries1 I KNOW!!!
@MASB29 It is a work in progress for now. I cannot send a work-in-progress-prototype plane, but, uh... oh well.
Sure, it's a stealth fighter. NOT!!! First off, it's faceted, like the F-117 Nighthawk. Nowadays, they prefer smoother ones. Because it's faceted, there is more drag. (5187, mine is only 3921, 3462 minus the landing gear) Also, it's not so very appealing to the eye either. Not even the coloring makes it a stealth fighter. And no BVR too. I think it's only advantage is it's agility and speed, as well as it's ability to perform Short Take-offs. Other than that, mine is overall better.
Well, it's good, but mine maneuvers better.
F-16 Falcon with accurate dimensions and performance.