I doubt it is DEGRADATION, but close to it. I've already come to terms with the fact that this site is now post-modern and any fool with crooked hands and good social skills will receive trucks of free upvotes, only because he knows how to suck up to people.
And all of you (including my friend Vito) have to come to terms with this
My friend Vito asked to remove my comment and write only here. So, your C-5 is a garbage, yeah. Really, this is not platinum build, my eyes are bleeding!
@KnightOfRen how about not being a chicken and admitting your mistake? You write nonsense, discrediting the works of hundreds of people and wonder why you are criticized.
@KnightOfRen The Su-57 and F-22 were designed as multifunctional air superiority fighters. Not surprisingly, they are similar. Dude, the aviation industry is not a f*cking auto industry, where design is more important than functionality.
@KnightOfRen The basis of the MiG-31 was developed on the basis of the MiG-25.
The MiG-31 was built according to the scheme of the MiG-25 aircraft, but with a crew of two people - a pilot and a navigator-operator, located one after the other.
these suggestions from Wikipedia tell us clearly that the MiG-31 is based on the MiG-25. Sometimes, before creating such serious posts, you need to learn more.
man, I try to be loyal to clinical idiots and always try to explain what is wrong and how to fix it, but you better delete this post and not be embarrassed
Yes BIG NO GIIIIIANT NO YOU SERIOUS?
the similarity of these planes can be explained by the fact that planes have similar tasks and "geniuses think the same." Apart from the example of the MiG-31 and F-15. Let me remind you that the F-15 was developed in an emergency order after the US found out about the MiG-25 and realized that their light fighters would s*ck the fuel rod of this twin-engine monster.
Древнее зло пробудилось
ok
@RussianAce ОСТД gang
@DaKraken same here, i am open to critics
+1@Demogorgon we ,Russians, say what we think and say it sincerely. That's not the reason to hate us
+1I doubt it is DEGRADATION, but close to it. I've already come to terms with the fact that this site is now post-modern and any fool with crooked hands and good social skills will receive trucks of free upvotes, only because he knows how to suck up to people.
+1And all of you (including my friend Vito) have to come to terms with this
italian F-15
italian F-15
@PilotTRALALA thank you!
Lol, another cancer. Great job, sp community
+1you serious?
supersonic prop plane
increase the mass of your LG
+1i am Mikoyan MiG-29SMT fighter
better that KnightOfRen lol. Keep working, you have a potential!
+3Cool!
AM I EVIL?
YeS I aM!
AM I EVIL?
I aM mAn! YeS i Am!
gosh, my favorite Diamond Head song
Hey! Can i use your hull for my tank? I'll credit you
ahem 1
ahem 2
ahem 3 (this one should be hard)
nice video, but your landing skills are not the best
how much entries can i make?
comedy king.
rest in pepperonis
Amazing!!!
@Highground don't try to revive the corpse
not bad
@metaphysicalgnome трiшечки
+1Was born in Ukraine, in 2014 became a citizen of Russia, a couple of years ago moved with my family to Israel. Yes, i was born in Crimea.
lol.
+1love it a lot! Great job!:)
+1@Nuschel here
Tunguska? Cool!
@ACEPILOT109 your cabin(cockpit, whatever), wings and tail section are terrific. Try to make them more smooth, because this looks kinda bad
@ACEPILOT109 nope, it needs several more weeks of super hard work. Why you just hurry so much? Nice & Slow, buddy
My friend Vito asked to remove my comment and write only here. So, your C-5 is a garbage, yeah. Really, this is not platinum build, my eyes are bleeding!
+3@Spartan17902 uhh, i really don't know
nice gun trucc
gonna use it
delete this now. This is racism.
WE NEED TRACKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+3all we had to was follow the damn Tu-95 CJ!
Tea
this CF-105 looks minblowing! T
@KnightOfRen you are only interested in aviation for 2 months and already create similar threads on the forum. You do not notice the catch?
@KnightOfRen how about not being a chicken and admitting your mistake? You write nonsense, discrediting the works of hundreds of people and wonder why you are criticized.
@KnightOfRen The Su-57 and F-22 were designed as multifunctional air superiority fighters. Not surprisingly, they are similar. Dude, the aviation industry is not a f*cking auto industry, where design is more important than functionality.
@KnightOfRen The basis of the MiG-31 was developed on the basis of the MiG-25.
The MiG-31 was built according to the scheme of the MiG-25 aircraft, but with a crew of two people - a pilot and a navigator-operator, located one after the other.
these suggestions from Wikipedia tell us clearly that the MiG-31 is based on the MiG-25. Sometimes, before creating such serious posts, you need to learn more.
man, I try to be loyal to clinical idiots and always try to explain what is wrong and how to fix it, but you better delete this post and not be embarrassed
Yes
+1BIG NO
GIIIIIANT NO
YOU SERIOUS?
the similarity of these planes can be explained by the fact that planes have similar tasks and "geniuses think the same." Apart from the example of the MiG-31 and F-15. Let me remind you that the F-15 was developed in an emergency order after the US found out about the MiG-25 and realized that their light fighters would s*ck the fuel rod of this twin-engine monster.
@ChrisPy they are real