@thewrecker03 you couldve just put the link here and tagged me lmao, also, i dont see it, cuz its unlisted. Only your or people with the link see unlisted posts.
Here's your score:
Looks: 9/15 - It looks kinda small, the steering wheel is tiny, it has some features that dont fit with the era (rear end of the sidepods), has very noticeble texture clipping, and the "suspension" arms are bulky.
Realism: 5/15 - Too much grip, accelerates too fast, is too easy to flip and has no suspension, wheel or shock based. The last part is a cardinal sin.
Handling: 6/15 - Same complaints as before.
Personal Rating: 2.5/5 - Didnt like it much.
Total: 22.5/50
@thewrecker03 i used the formula the game gives me (RotorRPM/600), i just replaced RotorRPM with the Engine's Variable Output i set for RPM (EngineRPM, just click the output thingy and write EngineRPM in the name section for the RPM variable) and decreased the multiplier in the gauge until it worked.
Here's your score:
Looks: 7.5/15 - I didnt like that much. Doesnt feel like it belongs in '63.
Realism: 6/15 - It accelerates too fast, has too much grip at low speed and too little while at high speed (way more understeer than cars of that era had), plus the steering wheel not being circular and relatively small is a bummer.
Handling: 6/15 - Same complaints as before.
Personal rating: 2/5 - Not much to comment.
Total: 21.5/50
Hey, sorry for the time i took to review it. Put all my notes in notepad and forgot to put them here, apologies.
Here's your score:
Accuracy: 10/15 - The shape itself is perfect, but i miss the intakes in the front of the side pods, details on the floor and the livery.
Handling: 12.5/15 - It feels good to drive, but it accelerates so slowly.
Realism: 12.5/15 - The acceleration man, it is way too slow. Also it feels like it has too much turn in at super low speeds.
Personal rating: 3/5 - No comment here, just what i said before.
Total: 38/50
Here's your score!
Looks: 14/15 - It looks really good, i just wish it had a slightly wider wheelbase.
Realism: 13/15 - It is realistic, i just wish it was more oversteery. Also, the suspension has too much camber, and is too soft. I like the driver "dying" part tho, it is really cool.
Handling: 14/15 - It handles really well, i really do like it, if it just had stiffer suspension...
Personal rating: 5/5 - Even with all issues, its a blast to drive!
Total: 46/50 - Well done!
Here's your score. I'll ignore the lack of a limiter because it takes long to get above 350Km/h and i couldn't do it in the Gold Prix.
Looks: 13/15 - It looks wonderful, but the cars is too long and the wheelbase is too narrow for this type of car.
Realism: 12.5/15 - It is really good in this aspect, i just feel that the clutch is kinda abrupt and takes a bit long to get back on power, and that the acceleration is too fast.
Handling: 14/15 - It feels really nice.
Personal rating: 4/5 - If it was shorter and wider.....
Total: 43.5/50
Hey, with the beta available i could finally test it. Here's your score:
Looks: 15/15 - All i can say is that it is gorgeous!
Handling: 15/15 - Masterfully tuned, very fun, challenging, i love it!
Realism: 14/15 - I found the top speed a bit low for this era. Everything else is perfect tho.
Personal rating: 5/5 - Most fun ive had in a while with SP, very well done!
Total: 49/50
Looks: 2.5/15 - Its a box basically. Best thing is the engine.
Realism: 6.5/15 - It's understeery, like a car from this time. First gear acceleration is good, 2nd gear too. Worst part about it in the realism front, is the lack of suspension, super strong brakes and pretty high top speed.
Handling: 6.5/15 - Same things that hurt it in the previous category hurt it here. Mainly the lack of suspension and strong brakes.
Personall rating: 2/5 - Yeah, its kinda cool i guess...
Total: 17.5/50
@CC1010 Now, i know what youre thinking: "Can i still rely on my swords and spells and all that nonsense?". Sure, sure...... or you could use...... THE WABBAJACK!
@KfcGaming thanks!
@thewrecker03 thanks, imma check it out
It's out!
Click here!
Tags: @DJ2keroni @Ouroboros @LotusCarsSub
@thewrecker03 i meam the link to the post, not your account.
@thewrecker03 you couldve just put the link here and tagged me lmao, also, i dont see it, cuz its unlisted. Only your or people with the link see unlisted posts.
@thewrecker03 can you give me the unlisted link?
Here's your score:
Looks: 9/15 - It looks kinda small, the steering wheel is tiny, it has some features that dont fit with the era (rear end of the sidepods), has very noticeble texture clipping, and the "suspension" arms are bulky.
Realism: 5/15 - Too much grip, accelerates too fast, is too easy to flip and has no suspension, wheel or shock based. The last part is a cardinal sin.
Handling: 6/15 - Same complaints as before.
Personal Rating: 2.5/5 - Didnt like it much.
Total: 22.5/50
@thewrecker03 alright fam, good luck
@thewrecker03 i used the formula the game gives me (
RotorRPM/600), i just replacedRotorRPMwith the Engine's Variable Output i set for RPM (EngineRPM, just click the output thingy and write EngineRPM in the name section for the RPM variable) and decreased the multiplier in the gauge until it worked.@thewrecker03 i decreased the multiplier. Took some finetuning, but it works from my testing.
@Sm10684 yeah, that also makes sense
T to be Tagged! Planning on posting tommorow.
Shoutout to @ProjectR for being a test driver!
Boa, mt melhor q minha primeira tentativa
Ill definetely participate.
Here's your score:
Looks: 7.5/15 - I didnt like that much. Doesnt feel like it belongs in '63.
Realism: 6/15 - It accelerates too fast, has too much grip at low speed and too little while at high speed (way more understeer than cars of that era had), plus the steering wheel not being circular and relatively small is a bummer.
Handling: 6/15 - Same complaints as before.
Personal rating: 2/5 - Not much to comment.
Total: 21.5/50
@ThatKindaWeeb huh. I mean, im a beta tester, but im 100% its the actual update. Whats your android version?
Wdym? It says the last update ive had was October 12th, 2021, and im on android...
Hey, sorry for the time i took to review it. Put all my notes in notepad and forgot to put them here, apologies.
+1Here's your score:
Accuracy: 10/15 - The shape itself is perfect, but i miss the intakes in the front of the side pods, details on the floor and the livery.
Handling: 12.5/15 - It feels good to drive, but it accelerates so slowly.
Realism: 12.5/15 - The acceleration man, it is way too slow. Also it feels like it has too much turn in at super low speeds.
Personal rating: 3/5 - No comment here, just what i said before.
Total: 38/50
@BBCP117 then you cant get pissed at someone not building what you want.
@BBCP117 make it then
@WingsOfSteel i shall review it soon, after the turkish grand prix. Looks really good tho
+2Here's your score!
Looks: 14/15 - It looks really good, i just wish it had a slightly wider wheelbase.
Realism: 13/15 - It is realistic, i just wish it was more oversteery. Also, the suspension has too much camber, and is too soft. I like the driver "dying" part tho, it is really cool.
Handling: 14/15 - It handles really well, i really do like it, if it just had stiffer suspension...
Personal rating: 5/5 - Even with all issues, its a blast to drive!
Total: 46/50 - Well done!
Here's your score. I'll ignore the lack of a limiter because it takes long to get above 350Km/h and i couldn't do it in the Gold Prix.
Looks: 13/15 - It looks wonderful, but the cars is too long and the wheelbase is too narrow for this type of car.
Realism: 12.5/15 - It is really good in this aspect, i just feel that the clutch is kinda abrupt and takes a bit long to get back on power, and that the acceleration is too fast.
Handling: 14/15 - It feels really nice.
Personal rating: 4/5 - If it was shorter and wider.....
Total: 43.5/50
Hey, with the beta available i could finally test it. Here's your score:
Looks: 15/15 - All i can say is that it is gorgeous!
Handling: 15/15 - Masterfully tuned, very fun, challenging, i love it!
Realism: 14/15 - I found the top speed a bit low for this era. Everything else is perfect tho.
Personal rating: 5/5 - Most fun ive had in a while with SP, very well done!
Total: 49/50
Amogus
+1@LotusCarsSub my guy, they need money..... would you rather have SP be full of ads and microtransactions?
Ayy, im in the 10% in smth in my life
@CheckOneTwo yes you can, use overload and fine tuner however you want
@pura ill extend the deadline, dont worry. They said itd take a week, so maybe this week itll come out
@LotusCarsSub the challenge says 1920 to 1985 man.........
@LotusCarsSub no cars past 1985 are allowed, but you can bend F1 rules, as long ad they still follow my challenge's rules.
Ill take some time to review because of the beta not being available for me yet. As soon as i get it, first thing ill do is check it out
@Alterva yes, but it cant be seen. Id prefer if you made the downforce with wings but yeah, you can use props
Acontece, é triste mas fazer o q?
Now i can make gunships, lets go!
This oughta be the longest week of my life, waiting for the beta. Cant wait to try everything out!
+1Mfer stole my [KROMER], cant have shit in the dark world
+2Thanks for entering! Here's your score:
Looks: 2.5/15 - Its a box basically. Best thing is the engine.
Realism: 6.5/15 - It's understeery, like a car from this time. First gear acceleration is good, 2nd gear too. Worst part about it in the realism front, is the lack of suspension, super strong brakes and pretty high top speed.
Handling: 6.5/15 - Same things that hurt it in the previous category hurt it here. Mainly the lack of suspension and strong brakes.
Personall rating: 2/5 - Yeah, its kinda cool i guess...
Total: 17.5/50
@YoDudeChase yeah i guess, i just dont like Ovals as a primary type of track. Road Courses are 100× better imo
+1@KamikazR6 ah, so you like going in circles for 3 hours....... pathetic lmao
+1@jamesPLANESii oh...
I just noticed i flipped the links, im so dumb lmao
@LieutenantSOT lmao
@rexzion No.
Jk
Edit: flipped the links and i didnt notice
@Shippy456 <<Dirty Boots>>
+1I had this favourited for so long and never upvoted it........ oops
@CC1010 imo Oblivion is the best. Morrowind is great too. Skyrim is the most casual but the most raw, dumb, high octane fun.
@CC1010 i think i have about 500 hours in skyrim, 50 in Morrowind, 150 in Oblivion and 5 in Daggerfall, mostly archer assassins and knights
@CC1010 geez man. I never use staves, i prefer a good sword and shield or sword and spell build
@CC1010 Now, i know what youre thinking: "Can i still rely on my swords and spells and all that nonsense?". Sure, sure...... or you could use...... THE WABBAJACK!
+2