@Gameboi14 ah whatever man. Im a fan of Juice but am i really going to say "god flippin rabbit" or something like this? No. I get your point about profanity and im not tryina be an aehole but still, im not gonna censor my feelings, he surely wouldnt.
Hi, here is your score:
Handling: 7/10 - Makes pretty wide turns but other than that its good
Acceleration: 10/10 - No comments
Braking: 9/10 - No comments
Design: 10/10 - I love it, it looks like a Lancia Stratos.
Bonus points: 0/5 - No comments
Total: 36/45
Medium score: 33,5 aproximated to 34.
Sorry that i took so long to review but here is your score:
Handling: 5/10 - Very twitchy, but i really like the suspension system.
Acceleration: 10/10 - No comments
Braking: 7/10 - It brakes well enough.
Design: 9/10 - Its really good.
Bonus points: 0/5 - No comments.
Total: 31/45.
Hallo, here is the score for your entry:
Acceleration: 10/10 - ITS OVERKILL!
Handling: 5/10 - Handles very well but the controls are twitchy...
Braking: 8/10 - Good brakes, but not perfect for the max speed.
Desing: 5/10 - Good looking but bland colour wise.
Bonus points: 0/5.
Total: 28/45.
@Adanene @Jauntyccmbr @wzr1 @VANNRULZ
@Johnnyynf @Zanedavid @davis8634 the results are now live! Here is the link for yall to check: https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/992612
@Jauntyccmbr hey, waddup! Sorry that i took a while to check this build out but here is your review:
Style: 10/10 - Looks fantastic! Great job on the fuselage!
Drivability: 6/10 - It is way too slidy, also that flap thingy was completely unnecessary in my humble opinion.
Description: 6/10 - No comments.
Bonus points: 0/5 - No comments.
Your build was 3 parts above the part limit but whatever, such a little ammount. You fidnt lose any points for this fact.
Main fuselage is too smal compared to the intakes makimg it not look like a replica. Also use rotators for the elevators so that the whole wing ŕotates instead of the control surface.
@Nobodygood i tried without it being inverted and for me it felt worse than inverted, but it is a simple fix so anyone can do wgatever they want with that.
I got the 50 battles to get this thing in the course of 2 days. I spent 4 hours on the first and got 16 (mostly using tier 6s) and the resting 34 the next day on the course of 4 hours, this time on tier 4s. Says something about tryhards. I stopped playing Blitz 1 month later. I only returned at the AC IV Experimental and i already had the tank for 1 year, as i got it from a crate. Blitz is fucked nowadays. WG please fix.
P.s: Derp gun on the Scavenger is awesome!
@carrot2110 no problem!
+1I LOVE THIS! Nice Work man!
+1@Homemade yeah got helped again. Man you too are great for the comunity.
+1Thanks m8, definitevaly improved the original design. Very good work man!
+1GIVE ME MOIST NUGGET! ITS GOOD RIFLE!
+1Nice! Wow that is a good looking plane!
+1@Zippy6 nah fam its Extra weight. I need my W E I G H T R E D U C T I O N B R O
+1@MattEpic cha cha real smooth
+1Help i accidentally joined a peanut praising cult.
+1@MattEpic man no problem. Keep going with the good work man.
+1No doubt, one of your best aircraft man. Well done.
+1T for Trouble
+1@DuckMint i say again, whatever, the post is tagged as "feelings", so i can vent about my feelings. Plus, i hate social media.
+1@Gameboi14 ah whatever man. Im a fan of Juice but am i really going to say "god flippin rabbit" or something like this? No. I get your point about profanity and im not tryina be an aehole but still, im not gonna censor my feelings, he surely wouldnt.
+1Dude, build more simple stuff like this! Its amazing man!
+1@miguel yes
+1Hi, here is your score:
+1Handling: 7/10 - Makes pretty wide turns but other than that its good
Acceleration: 10/10 - No comments
Braking: 9/10 - No comments
Design: 10/10 - I love it, it looks like a Lancia Stratos.
Bonus points: 0/5 - No comments
Total: 36/45
Medium score: 33,5 aproximated to 34.
Sorry that i took so long to review but here is your score:
+1Handling: 5/10 - Very twitchy, but i really like the suspension system.
Acceleration: 10/10 - No comments
Braking: 7/10 - It brakes well enough.
Design: 9/10 - Its really good.
Bonus points: 0/5 - No comments.
Total: 31/45.
I just noticed, its a Testarossa in the back. Thats like, my 2nd favourite Ferrari. Imma review this soon.
+1Hallo, here is the score for your entry:
+1Acceleration: 10/10 - ITS OVERKILL!
Handling: 5/10 - Handles very well but the controls are twitchy...
Braking: 8/10 - Good brakes, but not perfect for the max speed.
Desing: 5/10 - Good looking but bland colour wise.
Bonus points: 0/5.
Total: 28/45.
Looks like a LaFerrari.
+1@randomusername dude, that would be awesome! I love Porsches!
+1@CruzerBlade scheiße
+1@Shadowed what was your old account? I am curious.
+1@ErickvCamilo denada
+1@ErickvCamilo ok
+1Hey, i xmled your stuff. Its this posts successor, go check it out.
+1Imma call this "Simple Combat X: Skies of Attackers".
+1@TheEpicMOONHAWK i see. Nice job nonetheless
+1@TheFantasticTyphoon if 2 people report the pist basically gets deleted, want me to help with that?
+1@Jauntyccmbr you are welcome! Hoped you like the prize!
+1@johnnyynf
+1@Adanene @Jauntyccmbr @wzr1 @VANNRULZ
+1@Johnnyynf @Zanedavid @davis8634 the results are now live! Here is the link for yall to check: https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/992612
@Jauntyccmbr hey, waddup! Sorry that i took a while to check this build out but here is your review:
+1Style: 10/10 - Looks fantastic! Great job on the fuselage!
Drivability: 6/10 - It is way too slidy, also that flap thingy was completely unnecessary in my humble opinion.
Description: 6/10 - No comments.
Bonus points: 0/5 - No comments.
Your build was 3 parts above the part limit but whatever, such a little ammount. You fidnt lose any points for this fact.
Main fuselage is too smal compared to the intakes makimg it not look like a replica. Also use rotators for the elevators so that the whole wing ŕotates instead of the control surface.
+1@YourWife problem is that i dont have a wired keyboard anymore, all wireless.
+1Oh no! Hanz, full reverse! It's zie Scheissebarn!
Serriously tho, i love how this looks, but i cant run it sadly. But continue the good work bro!
+1@Adanene you are welcome! No problem about the handling tho.
+1Why dont you post the ship so that it is easier to understand your issue.
+1@Ryn176 look at my name, if i added blyat it would mean "Mobius1SoB". Im the maddest of all lads
+1@JamesBoA i agree with @Aeromen . Not everyone has the money. Not everyone lives in the US or places where PCs are availeble.
+1@randomusername thanks. By the way, the hell is ISTP-A?
+1@NighthawkAquila yeah, lost a worth while oponent looks at markov while saying this sentence
+1@NighthawkAquila welp it was easy alright. Found it by complete and utter chance. Thanks!
+1@Nobodygood i tried without it being inverted and for me it felt worse than inverted, but it is a simple fix so anyone can do wgatever they want with that.
+1Cool concept.
+1I got the 50 battles to get this thing in the course of 2 days. I spent 4 hours on the first and got 16 (mostly using tier 6s) and the resting 34 the next day on the course of 4 hours, this time on tier 4s. Says something about tryhards. I stopped playing Blitz 1 month later. I only returned at the AC IV Experimental and i already had the tank for 1 year, as i got it from a crate. Blitz is fucked nowadays. WG please fix.
+1P.s: Derp gun on the Scavenger is awesome!
4:20 parts. By the way, amazing build!
+1@JamesBleriot no scheiße sherlock (BTW dont get offended its a joke)
+1Bro you know everyone would spam Super Tucanos/mano, voce sabe que geral faria Super Tucanos ne?
+1