@TASTEinc I know what happened with the f-120 when it was deployed, it was fast but sluggish in terms of turning, if ya want I can let you see a prototype of the f-125 and try it out
@TASTEinc I know, that's why I'm makeing this a fighter that can outturn most things the berrilandians can put on it at low altitudes and of the fighter is more maneuverable it can just outclimb the fighter and dive on it, and at high altitudes it will dominate nearly any fighter because of its controllability at said high altitudes
@TASTEinc I do agree that the bloc thunders should escort but they seem vulnerable to g stress and not having that heavy of a armament, the second one is kinda on @Aarav since he doesn't seem to allow 20 mm cannons or twin engine fighters
@TASTEinc and the bomber goes the recommended speed (mach 2) at it's cruising altitude (50k plus feet) with a payload of 12 boom 25s and a option for 22 or 24 with external payload and could travel from wright to snowstone 2-4 times on the current fuel load and depending on the speed
@Yeitcatplanes @TASTEinc the test aircraft for the b-80 can go 1300+ mph at altitudes above 40,000 feet and I'm planning on having them fly at 60,000 or 50,000 feet
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes you got 2 things wrong, my corporation is aeroaerospace and the mc-47s are bombers/attack aircraft now since the mc-67 is in production, but other then that I love this build, good job
@TASTEinc I make aircraft for both stanland and berraland
@TASTEinc ye I got confused
@TASTEinc I'm on the side opposing krabolen
@TASTEinc I know what happened with the f-120 when it was deployed, it was fast but sluggish in terms of turning, if ya want I can let you see a prototype of the f-125 and try it out
@TASTEinc and yes I do feel like it could make a good interceptor to
@TASTEinc I know, that's why I'm makeing this a fighter that can outturn most things the berrilandians can put on it at low altitudes and of the fighter is more maneuverable it can just outclimb the fighter and dive on it, and at high altitudes it will dominate nearly any fighter because of its controllability at said high altitudes
It goes 1800+ mph at 50,000 feet where it will escort high altitude bombers
@TASTEinc @Hiimakeplanes I am makeing a fighter with 1 minigun and 4 wing guns, it's so far the fastest fighter in our fighter branch
@1VirtualRealityConversion yep
Also I didn't know the b-80 was a heavy bomber but it is now lol
@TASTEinc I do agree that the bloc thunders should escort but they seem vulnerable to g stress and not having that heavy of a armament, the second one is kinda on @Aarav since he doesn't seem to allow 20 mm cannons or twin engine fighters
@TASTEinc I'm better at bombers and fighters
@TASTEinc I'm not the best on ground or cargo
@TASTEinc ok
@SPairforce ok
@Ocllhn I have
@Aarav also once you do or if you do I want a b-80 to bomb any major krabolen airports
@Aarav please add my b-80
@Ocllhn thanks, it's only for a challenge though so don't expect much
@Ocllhn yes
@TASTEinc I'm pretty sure mostly Korean war f4us had 20 mms
@TASTEinc most of them are still a long way from becoming a thing
@LieutenantSOT
@LieutenantSOT if allowed I'm adding 3 35 mm cannons for air to ground and the 20 mms will the a air to air
@LieutenantSOT am I allowed to reupload it with labels and better handling? If so I might also increase the bomb load
@LieutenantSOT nice
T
@NotNewHere I'm making my own f4u corsair but I'm having trouble makeing the tail look right, could you help me with it?
Also 15/10 plane
@MitchellAviation https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/J2C9CK/ww1-dogfight-challenge
@MitchellAviation I forgot my submission wasn't a successor for some reason
@TASTEinc and the bomber goes the recommended speed (mach 2) at it's cruising altitude (50k plus feet) with a payload of 12 boom 25s and a option for 22 or 24 with external payload and could travel from wright to snowstone 2-4 times on the current fuel load and depending on the speed
@TASTEinc it's a jet engine bomber
@Yeitcatplanes @TASTEinc the test aircraft for the b-80 can go 1300+ mph at altitudes above 40,000 feet and I'm planning on having them fly at 60,000 or 50,000 feet
Oh I won't need it
@Aarav and could I use 4+ power engines for the bomber?
@Hannyboy luckily for me I'm makeing something better
@TASTEinc pretty much reliving the fighter I was gonna put in the first block war but that fighter didn't make it
@TASTEinc I was thinking of a f-14 like fighter coupled with a mach2 medium bomber
@Aarav could I make a twin engine fighter if not I will make a multirole fighter in under the light bomber category
I will have to make 2 planes to fill the gaps
The b-56 and f-120 failed
NOOOOO
@Hannyboy wait what
@typeZERO even better a f4u-5 Corsair!
@Aarav also aarav once your back send out 6 b-56 high altitude bombers to bomb Yeager with 15 f-120 escorts
@Yeitcatplanes I already made one
@Aarav exactly
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes and once bee finally reads my message about how turboprops have jet engines in them to work we might get jets
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes you got 2 things wrong, my corporation is aeroaerospace and the mc-47s are bombers/attack aircraft now since the mc-67 is in production, but other then that I love this build, good job