@JCobb Keep trying man! When I first started I was absolute trash by comparison to what I can do now. I got better by practicing, experimenting, and learning what I could by observing other peoples designs.
Well, I did a little bit of experimenting with one of my planes by ripping off the upper set of wings, and it seems to me that what may be the best course of action is to close the distance between the center of thrust and the center of mass. Don't take this as any sort of irrefutable science, just a tiny bit of experimenting, but I do hope it helps.
OK that's REALLY weird, the one that I was working on suddenly has three hundred parts, I didn't do THAT much work on it, does anyone know of any bug that might cause this?
Very nice! I tried to make something similar a while back but it turned out hugely different than I had intended, regardless, drones are cool! And yours is no exception
You've got my empathy, I have a very sensitive nose, always have. When a dry spell hits my area it's RIP in pepperoni for my nose if I so much as look at it funny.
It's still really sensitive outside of dry times, but especially then.
Very nice work, I like your attention to detail regarding the aesthetics of the harrier. Here, have a cool picture from the inside of one, and an upvote.
@Supercraft888 Ohhhhhhh man, you reminded me of something that I've been wanting to make, but it would be pretty impossible to. There's this show called last exile that has a bunch of dieselpunk-esque aircraft called vanships and I want to make one.
@Supercraft888 Hey thanks! I guess I can see where you're coming from in a few ways, perhaps especially with the marriage of old and new that I did here.
Nice, as for what you should do next... how about a Convair F-104, the Delta Dart. IIRC it has a pretty bad rep, I wonder if you can make it work well.
@Supercraft888 I can't tell if that was a rhetorical question or not, but I dunno, it beats me. I don't understand how some folks can get upvotes by reposting a gold or platinum user's content with minimal changes, yet people who post OC of decent (I know it's subjective) quality get ignored. Don't get me wrong, I'm not whining that my planes should be upvoted just because I feel like they're better than others. I'm just saying that I don't necessarily understand some of the logic that this community follows.
Sorry for the wordy reply, I kinda got away from myself there.
@ChaMikey I mean, it's not exactly an original roundel, I believe that it's a variation on Free Erusea's roundel. As for the tiny triangles, I could try but boy oh boy would they have to be tiiiiiiiiiny.
@Ebish Thanks!
@IStoleYourMeme Thanks! @MrVaultech Uh, thanks, which plane if I may ask? You have so many that it's hard to find something terribly similar
@TheGuyWhoFliesToGetHisPie Thanks! Also, you're name is difficult to type.
I have fond memories of shooting these things down, nice job!
Now we just need a MiG-21 and an Su-17, then we can have the pipe fitters.
(Pipe is common nickname for MiG-21, NATO name for Su-17 is Fitter)
@MrMecha Hey thanks!
@JCobb Keep trying man! When I first started I was absolute trash by comparison to what I can do now. I got better by practicing, experimenting, and learning what I could by observing other peoples designs.
And here I was thinking that Ugly was simply a designation
Grunder? Ace Combat? Sorry if these words make no sense to you, just curious.
Very nice, the colors remind me of Saudi F-5s.
@Supercraft888 Fire away.
@Samwise No problem.
Well, I did a little bit of experimenting with one of my planes by ripping off the upper set of wings, and it seems to me that what may be the best course of action is to close the distance between the center of thrust and the center of mass. Don't take this as any sort of irrefutable science, just a tiny bit of experimenting, but I do hope it helps.
Ok, try this, I did the best I could without performing a total rebuild or adding things that a Mirage IV doesn't have, like canards.
Somehow, the game copied a bit of antennae that I had added to the nose some 200+ times, and that was what was causing issues.
OK that's REALLY weird, the one that I was working on suddenly has three hundred parts, I didn't do THAT much work on it, does anyone know of any bug that might cause this?
@Supercraft888 Thanks, @ChaMikey Yeah... I need to get on that.
@Feanor Thanks!
I'll give it a shot, no promises that I can fix it but I'll see if I can provide feedback.
@spefyjerbf Hey, thanks!
@AeroEngineering @Jetspeed1001 Thanks, guys!
Very nice! Good proportions too, just a tiny bit bigger than the real thing.
@Supercraft8888 Thanks
Very nice! I tried to make something similar a while back but it turned out hugely different than I had intended, regardless, drones are cool! And yours is no exception
@deusalgor No problem, I was looking around at some other folks vehicles looking for ideas, gotta say this was a fun little tank in Warthunder.
All I see is a missing texture. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
You've got my empathy, I have a very sensitive nose, always have. When a dry spell hits my area it's RIP in pepperoni for my nose if I so much as look at it funny.
It's still really sensitive outside of dry times, but especially then.
Very nice work, I like your attention to detail regarding the aesthetics of the harrier. Here, have a cool picture from the inside of one, and an upvote.
@AgDynamics Thanks!
@Liquidfox Oh hey, you're the guy who did the Thunderscreech, thanks!
@Supercraft888 Ohhhhhhh man, you reminded me of something that I've been wanting to make, but it would be pretty impossible to. There's this show called last exile that has a bunch of dieselpunk-esque aircraft called vanships and I want to make one.
@Supercraft888 Hey thanks! I guess I can see where you're coming from in a few ways, perhaps especially with the marriage of old and new that I did here.
@Viper28 Thanks! @Aerobako Thanks too, what good is a functional aircraft if it doesn't look cool /s
Very nice indeed! I'm sure I can find a use for these, thanks!
@Supercraft888 And thanks again!
@Supercraft888 Thanks!
Nice, as for what you should do next... how about a Convair F-104, the Delta Dart. IIRC it has a pretty bad rep, I wonder if you can make it work well.
@ChaMikey Well, if I happen to get to sleep within the next hour-and-a-half or so, you won't have to wait too long.
@Supercraft888 I can't tell if that was a rhetorical question or not, but I dunno, it beats me. I don't understand how some folks can get upvotes by reposting a gold or platinum user's content with minimal changes, yet people who post OC of decent (I know it's subjective) quality get ignored. Don't get me wrong, I'm not whining that my planes should be upvoted just because I feel like they're better than others. I'm just saying that I don't necessarily understand some of the logic that this community follows.
Sorry for the wordy reply, I kinda got away from myself there.
@Supercraft888 Thanks man! I try my best.
@Supercraft888 No problem :)
@Supercraft888 Huh, I kinda forgot about that... even though it wasn't that long ago... it's late
@ChaMikey Well, I'll probably wind up uploading it tomorrow (today technically, EST) because I try to care about fake internet points.
@MrSilverWolf Thanks!
@Dosbrostacos Thanks again! Surprising again, too.
@Supercraft888 Thanks! Also, that's kinda surprising, this thing's a little old, were you searching for this plane?
@ChaMikey Thanks, I tried to match it up with the actual roundels that the aces have in Ace Combat 4.
@ChaMikey Wow, that's actually really nice! Both the logo and the fact that you made it. Here's the roundel I'll be putting on my planes.
@ChaMikey I mean, it's not exactly an original roundel, I believe that it's a variation on Free Erusea's roundel. As for the tiny triangles, I could try but boy oh boy would they have to be tiiiiiiiiiny.
@Manboy2 Like this , front prop is set to the reverse setting though