Hello, I'm Mmdben, a guy who love VTOL , nice to meet you
here is the basics of this place:-(Click on any blue text to go to it's source)
1- know how to use the fuselage block.
2- You should understand the Overload, and you should learn the XML values -click me to go to a perfect XML guide-
3-Fine tuner mod, just use it!
4 if you want to build replicas you MUST have designer suite.
5- (Optional)a mod that will make your combating skills way better -Advanced targeting mod-.
6-Go and download the top rated planes and disassemble them ,Learn how these top users create these incredible planes. just go to the Top users page and check all of them!
7- If you can't understand anything or you need help just ask for help and within the first 24 hours someone will help you I swear!
8- people love functionality, If you made a super detailed craft people will still upvote it but they will talk about how badly it flies! So make your plane a good flyer!
9- A simplified tutorial about to how to make a plane more stable in the air.
10- And DON"T STEAL,everyone is going to hate you for it! ,,,feel free to take whatever part you want from other planes but say in the description where you got it from ----- example .. I made a plane and I used one of your parts ,I must write in it's description , "Special Thanks to stephanieh for(whatever part I used from you), otherwise you'll be hated forever.
11- Make teasers such as this one!
12- Use these tricks to have a beautiful posts - The formatting guide-
And follow thesite rules, the mods are always active and watching ,Andrew gives them a steady supply of coffee in order not to sleep!
@HarryBen47 long story short, why doesn't the plane gain altitude while doing so( if it doesn't have thrust vectoring) like the MiG-29?
And about the example ,it a poor explanation about Net force,and for the references,CAnard and Herbst can be found on Wikipedia, The aerodynamic maneuverability look at Page 12 the 4th point on this PDF,(The models are in Page 4)
you might consider reading it, you won't regret it
I suggest that you look more into this, some of your statements aren't wrong but aren't right too like "rate of the nose making the plane more agile, more maneuverable and allow the plane to be controlled even stalling."( putting agility and maneuverability in the same sentence isn't right- most TVC was designed to achieve maneuverability not agility-) and "exposing more of his body to the flight path which of course increase the drag and knowing that the thrust is not going at the opposite direction of the drag anymore the plane will obviously loose energy"
( The thrust force wasn't terminated,So what did it do when its vector changed?????- For example If you were pushing against me and I suddenly let go and pushed you to the west you will continue to move in your path but you'll veer to the west- why doesn't the aircraft does that when loosing its energy?), Also Most of the Thrust vectoring Fighter jets can't achieve what the Su-35S can do- Do you know why?-because its 3-d thrust vectoring were backed up with an insane thrust force,Canards and a Aerodynamic maneuverable body.
furthermore, this doesn't explain these crucial Points which is a base of the Supermaneuverability.
I suggest you read about these things "Aerodynamic maneuverability" ------"Herbst maneuver (commonly known as the J-turn)" ----- "The Canards Functionality on some planes like the Gripen"
@CruzerBlade it's not bad,in fact it's an excellent design, but it has a lot of wasted potential which was sacrificed to give an Electronic warfare plane a WEAK stealth potential ....I mean it must be equipped with jammers if it an electronic warfare fighter ,SO why the stealthy design?
I'll tell you:- they did it for just the looks ( the same goes for its zigzagged doors and the merge of the spine and the cockpit which is the most flawed part of its "Stealthy design" )
I mean it won against the Boeing X-32 ( L=C thrust vectoring aircraft),but the Boeing X-32 was absolutely better than it in VTOL...but here is how the F-35 won:-
"Basically the F119-PW-614S (X-32 engine) was a Direct Lift engine, whereas the Lockheed Martin STOVL team used a more complex and riskier alternative, known as the F119-PW-611(the Brilliant poorly executed engine), which comprised a remote shaft-driven lift fan powered by the main engine. However, this generated more lift thrust than possible with only direct exhaust gases(SO the F-35 is superior). A successful design would have greater payload, and thus longer range than a simple thrust vectored turbofan" and that's how the X-32 lost, complete crap right?
@Squirrel How could you be so rude to VTOL engine,removing the VTOL components will make it like ∞times worse,just think about it for some time , I hope your nut storage burn and turn into ashes, and you're not getting any exotic nuts from me,this could have been you,but you choose not. You will regret this Mr. squirrel, the next winter will be your last.
(1)- Why you made such a dry description for this AMAZING Plane, the sign of you appreciating your plane is giving it a well made description.
(2)- Why didn't you already gave this amazing plane some tags?
(3)- You did make everything around the mainwing's control surfaces collision free ,Why didn't you do the same around the airbrakes and around the Beautiful weapons' bay?" So that ugly collide sound doesn't appear.
(4)- when in VTOL mode you'll have a very bad problem"it you didn't just boost to 100% in a second like most people", the landing legs are very short ,so every time you try to take off gently, the rear engine will just scratch the airstrip under it turning the plane to one side.
(3)-The Gyro is a little fast but it isn't the reason which causing the heavy response of the plane in VTOL, the COT and COM aren't aligned on the Y-axis.
Conclusion:-
Probably the best VTOL for this month(handles really well,very stable, and fun to fly), all of the things I said above isn't making this plane bad by any mean but it can be improved, you earned a follower.
"Will be out within the next few days" Will be out for WHO? huh, you little...........Corn smelling ice cream that is melting under the sun of the summer.
Hello, I'm Mmdben, a guy who love VTOL , nice to meet you
here is the basics of this place:-(Click on any blue text to go to it's source)
1- know how to use the fuselage block.
2- You should understand the Overload, and you should learn the XML values -click me to go to a perfect XML guide-
3-Fine tuner mod, just use it!
4 if you want to build replicas you MUST have designer suite.
5- (Optional)a mod that will make your combating skills way better -Advanced targeting mod-.
6-Go and download the top rated planes and disassemble them ,Learn how these top users create these incredible planes. just go to the Top users page and check all of them!
7- If you can't understand anything or you need help just ask for help and within the first 24 hours someone will help you I swear!
8- people love functionality, If you made a super detailed craft people will still upvote it but they will talk about how badly it flies! So make your plane a good flyer!
9- A simplified tutorial about to how to make a plane more stable in the air.
10- And DON"T STEAL,everyone is going to hate you for it! ,,,feel free to take whatever part you want from other planes but say in the description where you got it from ----- example .. I made a plane and I used one of your parts ,I must write in it's description , "Special Thanks to stephanieh for(whatever part I used from you), otherwise you'll be hated forever.
11- Make teasers such as this one!
12- Use these tricks to have a beautiful posts - The formatting guide-
And follow the site rules, the mods are always active and watching ,Andrew gives them a steady supply of coffee in order not to sleep!
-Hopefully this helps you!
+6@HarryBen47 long story short, why doesn't the plane gain altitude while doing so( if it doesn't have thrust vectoring) like the MiG-29?
+2And about the example ,it a poor explanation about Net force,and for the references,CAnard and Herbst can be found on Wikipedia, The aerodynamic maneuverability look at Page 12 the 4th point on this PDF,(The models are in Page 4)
you might consider reading it, you won't regret it
Make the tail a little longer, Here is my suggestion for the livery, Also you will pay me 2.23$ this time because it's a Plane.
I suggest that you look more into this, some of your statements aren't wrong but aren't right too like "rate of the nose making the plane more agile, more maneuverable and allow the plane to be controlled even stalling."( putting agility and maneuverability in the same sentence isn't right- most TVC was designed to achieve maneuverability not agility-) and "exposing more of his body to the flight path which of course increase the drag and knowing that the thrust is not going at the opposite direction of the drag anymore the plane will obviously loose energy"
+1( The thrust force wasn't terminated,So what did it do when its vector changed?????- For example If you were pushing against me and I suddenly let go and pushed you to the west you will continue to move in your path but you'll veer to the west- why doesn't the aircraft does that when loosing its energy?), Also Most of the Thrust vectoring Fighter jets can't achieve what the Su-35S can do- Do you know why?-because its 3-d thrust vectoring were backed up with an insane thrust force,Canards and a Aerodynamic maneuverable body.
furthermore, this doesn't explain these crucial Points which is a base of the Supermaneuverability.
I suggest you read about these things "Aerodynamic maneuverability" ------"Herbst maneuver (commonly known as the J-turn)" ----- "The Canards Functionality on some planes like the Gripen"
@Randomdoggo Thank the Ai, you can go and download my Racer,try it and you'll see how unfortunate the Ai flew it in the tournament.
It's not a VTOL but it's certainly awesome too,also Great flight performance mate!
+1@Randomdoggo That "someone" WAS ME.......
@randomusername I knew this would be what you will comment!
+2OR IT CAN BE AN Ai REMAKE.
+2@UltimatePlayer123 Congratulations, at least the Ai didn't fu*k all of the good planes
WTF JUNDROO
For a new user this aircraft is Great, you should consider landing in VTOL next time.
@Gameboi14 Ummmm, Whaaaat ??
@Nerfenthusiast I'll be hated for saying that, but the Triebflügel is a Tip jet more than a VTOL, and I hate helicopters.......
...Sigh..... a missed opportunity to be Spider man
+8@TAplanes Please, Don't do that again.
+3Actually* you can DRAG the blue word and the link will be revealed , Try dragging this
YOU SHOULDN'T Click any link you Find on the internet. Just look at these Viruses that can be waiting for you!
+2@JamesBoA No, it's VTOL .
@TAplanes
1. So you left everything and complained that I insulted you dungly twingly plane?
2.Please, READ the Third comment.
3.The picture isn't containing a player's build ,So you don't have anything on me.
@Thelegitpilot13 Nah, make them look for it.
A VTOL?
@Thelegitpilot13 READ the third comment, please .
@Armyguy1534 NOICE!
@CruzerBlade it's not bad,in fact it's an excellent design, but it has a lot of wasted potential which was sacrificed to give an Electronic warfare plane a WEAK stealth potential ....I mean it must be equipped with jammers if it an electronic warfare fighter ,SO why the stealthy design?
+5I'll tell you:- they did it for just the looks ( the same goes for its zigzagged doors and the merge of the spine and the cockpit which is the most flawed part of its "Stealthy design" )
I mean it won against the Boeing X-32 ( L=C thrust vectoring aircraft),but the Boeing X-32 was absolutely better than it in VTOL...but here is how the F-35 won:-
"Basically the F119-PW-614S (X-32 engine) was a Direct Lift engine, whereas the Lockheed Martin STOVL team used a more complex and riskier alternative, known as the F119-PW-611(the Brilliant poorly executed engine), which comprised a remote shaft-driven lift fan powered by the main engine. However, this generated more lift thrust than possible with only direct exhaust gases(SO the F-35 is superior). A successful design would have greater payload, and thus longer range than a simple thrust vectored turbofan" and that's how the X-32 lost, complete crap right?
Make your own concept of a VTOL train! or a Train transformer.
A futuristic VTOL !
+114877 drag points / 8.4lbs/ft2 ..................... .........hmmmmmm... .
(o_o), wow.
+1Yes, but it still have ∞respawns left, so don't worry.
@Sm10684 Ummmmmmm, does landing a VTOL consider worrying about Upvotes? anyway go land one.
@Sm10684 Ummmmm, SimplePLANES ?
@Squirrel How could you be so rude to VTOL engine,removing the VTOL components will make it like ∞times worse,just think about it for some time , I hope your nut storage burn and turn into ashes, and you're not getting any exotic nuts from me,this could have been you,but you choose not. You will regret this Mr. squirrel, the next winter will be your last.
Your definition of "having fun" is bad, Have you ever tried landing a VTOL? try to land one at the top of the control tower in snowtown.
Make the next post about VTOL engines and I'll give you some exotic nuts,I'm not going to make this offer again if you refused.
@Viper3000ad Yes it can land, I recommend 45% throttle,
+1I love the fact that you can take off from the uss tiny.
1
Now that a good car,
+1@Falken to add photos , you need them to be like this:-
So it should be like this
+2@villien and maneuverable.
+1@TheFantasticTyphoon SAD VTOL enthusiast Noises
+1It flight is very weird ,handling is even weirder, and weirdly enough I'm enjoying it.
+3This plane is just like:- GIVE ME ALL OF THE AIR,and all of the kills.
+1ME:- Finally a VTOL challenge "notice the rule mustn't exceed 400 parts"
-SAD XD-6 Noises -
+1@Falken I use steam too, just edit the description once you uploaded it here.
(1)- Why you made such a dry description for this AMAZING Plane, the sign of you appreciating your plane is giving it a well made description.
(2)- Why didn't you already gave this amazing plane some tags?
(3)- You did make everything around the mainwing's control surfaces collision free ,Why didn't you do the same around the airbrakes and around the Beautiful weapons' bay?" So that ugly collide sound doesn't appear.
(4)- when in VTOL mode you'll have a very bad problem"it you didn't just boost to 100% in a second like most people", the landing legs are very short ,so every time you try to take off gently, the rear engine will just scratch the airstrip under it turning the plane to one side.
(3)-The Gyro is a little fast but it isn't the reason which causing the heavy response of the plane in VTOL, the COT and COM aren't aligned on the Y-axis.
Conclusion:-
Probably the best VTOL for this month(handles really well,very stable, and fun to fly), all of the things I said above isn't making this plane bad by any mean but it can be improved, you earned a follower.
+3@AZAMGAMING just forget about it, it's a cool drawing after all , try to draw smooth lines next time.
"Will be out within the next few days" Will be out for WHO? huh, you little...........Corn smelling ice cream that is melting under the sun of the summer.
you typed the Arabian letters wrong, it's "الإمارات"Not "الامارات" that little thing that looks like a dot gave the word a whole new meaning.