@LunarEclipseSP hopefully itl turn good, i have only the minimallest skill in panelling, but i suppose it's just a test of patience because i want it to always look sharp-edge and it's kek
Post Scriptum, basically post text or something that you want to add but either forgot or very unrelated, example like "P.S. I'm very tired after this build so I'll take a break"
@DatTrainAndCarGuy19 that's legit one of my favorite map of all time, sad it doesn't work anymore on mobile kek
(it feels weird doesn't it? even I feel confused that it isn't the glint of gold I typically see XD)
@Mousewithamachinegun122 thank you; the MGLA fought well against the Royal Navy enough, a strong contender worthy of history, where do we go now.. now that the Monarchii is no more?
The hull's pretty decent(although for the weapons, it's displacement is... a bit lacking to shorten it), superstructure could use some work but is okay, I'm more curious why you've gone with the main armament it has, and if I'm being privy(which I am), that thing would only have one round each and then rip off from it's mounting due to its sheer size.. except if it's a recoilless rifle/rocket launcher to which I'm gonna ask why lmao
I'll say this again, SP is a great game, but it is past it's time, people move on to better games, and that's fine, honestly though, out of all I've encountered, SP is the greatest community I've ever been a part in.
They got rid of it for like already a decent whole now, cause yknow, it isnt exactly an image hoster but everyone uses it so their servers are FULL and thus they got rid of the ability, the picture would still exist tho in the said server
@Speedhunter preach! XD, SP is quite a tightly woven community, and a very formidable game, not a lot of game survives the first five years, let alone nearly 10 years Simpleplanes is slowly approaching, it's just.. quite a fun thing to think about, I love the whole SP Community as a whole because it's one of the places that I can truly be free so to speak.. heh
@Indo2010 well..
• i know a lot of people(i interact with the community)
• i love sharing simple-built obscure stuffs(planes, ships, you name it)
• enjoy the process, don't rush yourself
• take a break once so often
• ya ain't being chased by a canine guided missile, don't. rush. YOURSELF!(like seriously, don't.)
It's a mix of two, In-game(composition, SP tools/commands, light, background) and Editing(fixing colors, making things pop out, contrast, exposure); for the former, two tutorials I'd give out is one by ollielebananiaCFSP and TRD(TRD is a outdated, and with discord unhosting images, it's fwked) and also with associated commands and such on the comment sections; the latter I use Adobe Lightroom, of which my settings are :
you need to adjust this as needed as it is dynamic(e.g. predominant skies and water will make blue more vibrant, mass mountains and grass would make it green-yellow), play with the Saturation, maybe lessen the Hue a bit, lessen the Luminance if it is too bright.
closing words.. it is quite hard to understand at the beginning, I had that moment when I transitioned from Photoshop to Lightroom,the latter offers a more dynamic editing and fine tuning so that's why I changed, don't be afraid to fwk up one or two maybe even a dozen, just learn along with it and try to fix the flaws in every iteration, a Chinese saying I like is It's not uncommon to learn and practice at the same time., just have fun with it! shoooshs!
@Mousewithamachinegun123 fwked, I'm using a spare home phone to comment this, it's like, exceedingly potato, good thing it still can access the net though, albeit a bit slow
@Speedhunter thanks lol; it's a somewhat failed concept, and it's not really.. that good I guess? plan to revisit soon, maybe with a bigger ship because it's simpler
hm, what would ground stuff be called though? I already have PEA(Part-Efficient Aircrafts) and planning to add PEW(Part-Efficient Walkers), and honestly.. PEC(Part-Efficient Car) doesn't sound good... or PEG, yeah nah
@ShinyGemsBro boutta lol, just pushing this out then I'll be back on studying for a while, hey, gotta do what tcha gotta do ye?
+3such stonk
+3@LunarEclipseSP hopefully itl turn good, i have only the minimallest skill in panelling, but i suppose it's just a test of patience because i want it to always look sharp-edge and it's kek
+3@Graingy @Zhixunlin23 Wunderbar.
+3technically, yes, hell, some people(mostly the old gods) are very great at it, damn impressive they are
+3@TheMouse tested again, yeah, it's definitely my connection of sorts, I think.. hm... baffling
+3Post Scriptum, basically post text or something that you want to add but either forgot or very unrelated, example like "P.S. I'm very tired after this build so I'll take a break"
+3@LunarEclipseSP i'm flattered lmao
+3@LunarEclipseSP unless it is a replica of something irl, it ain't PEA lol, it is technically an LPA though, albeit... not really a plane is it? lmao
+3@LunarEclipseSP give her a break, maybe give it a snack since it's so skinny from the side XD
+3@DatTrainAndCarGuy19 that's legit one of my favorite map of all time, sad it doesn't work anymore on mobile kek
+3(it feels weird doesn't it? even I feel confused that it isn't the glint of gold I typically see XD)
@Mousewithamachinegun122 thank you; the MGLA fought well against the Royal Navy enough, a strong contender worthy of history, where do we go now.. now that the Monarchii is no more?
+3Dave on a Dave on a Dave
+3@LunarEclipseSP poggers; 107 part though kek
+3@Graingy you cant remove people's forum comments apparently; also, HOW DARE YOU
+3The hull's pretty decent(although for the weapons, it's displacement is... a bit lacking to shorten it), superstructure could use some work but is okay, I'm more curious why you've gone with the main armament it has, and if I'm being privy(which I am), that thing would only have one round each and then rip off from it's mounting due to its sheer size.. except if it's a recoilless rifle/rocket launcher to which I'm gonna ask why lmao
TL;DR. gun is too big for it's displacement
+3@AngularMomentum yes! welcome aboard! ( ^▽^ )
+3@Graingy hm, fair point.. but its like eating a matress, can i do it? yes. BUT WHY
+3dont you dare escalate a nuclear war, I HAVE ENOUGH HEADACHES XD
+3I'll say this again, SP is a great game, but it is past it's time, people move on to better games, and that's fine, honestly though, out of all I've encountered, SP is the greatest community I've ever been a part in.
+3@Apollo018362 very fun looking ( ^▽^ )
+3@HanakoSan yep, lol, as along as it is a static building(even lampposts, or just idk, bamboo trees or something)
+3@LunarEclipseSP oh hey, thanks lol
+3They got rid of it for like already a decent whole now, cause yknow, it isnt exactly an image hoster but everyone uses it so their servers are FULL and thus they got rid of the ability, the picture would still exist tho in the said server
+3@Graingy they're not the "romantic nation" for nothing i guess, heard Paris smelt like a garbage bin or something idk, ew
+3@Speedhunter preach! XD, SP is quite a tightly woven community, and a very formidable game, not a lot of game survives the first five years, let alone nearly 10 years Simpleplanes is slowly approaching, it's just.. quite a fun thing to think about, I love the whole SP Community as a whole because it's one of the places that I can truly be free so to speak.. heh
+3@Indo2010 well..
+3• i know a lot of people(i interact with the community)
• i love sharing simple-built obscure stuffs(planes, ships, you name it)
• enjoy the process, don't rush yourself
• take a break once so often
• ya ain't being chased by a canine guided missile, don't. rush. YOURSELF!(like seriously, don't.)
It's a mix of two, In-game(composition, SP tools/commands, light, background) and Editing(fixing colors, making things pop out, contrast, exposure); for the former, two tutorials I'd give out is one by ollielebananiaCFSP and TRD(TRD is a outdated, and with discord unhosting images, it's fwked) and also with associated commands and such on the comment sections; the latter I use Adobe Lightroom, of which my settings are :
Exposure : +1.50-1.70
Contrast : +10-20
Highlights : -100
Shadows : +25-27
Whites : -100
Blacks : +100
Temp : 0
Tint : +10
Vibrance : +56
Saturation : +39
[ Mix ]
[ Red ]
Hue : +10
Saturation : -16
Luminance : -36
[ Orange ]
Hue : -6
Saturation : -47
Luminance : +56
[ Yellow ]
Hue : -25
Saturation : -39
Luminance : +70
[ Green ]
Hue : +5
Saturation : -46
Luminance : +39
[ Cyan ]
Hue : 0
Saturation : -11
Luminance : +17
[ Blue ]
Hue : -20
Saturation : 0
Luminance : +25
[ Purple ]
Hue : 0
Saturation : 0
Luminance : 0
[ Pink ]
Hue : 0
Saturation : 0
Luminance : 0
Texture : -25
Clarity : -25
you need to adjust this as needed as it is dynamic(e.g. predominant skies and water will make blue more vibrant, mass mountains and grass would make it green-yellow), play with the Saturation, maybe lessen the Hue a bit, lessen the Luminance if it is too bright.
closing words.. it is quite hard to understand at the beginning, I had that moment when I transitioned from Photoshop to Lightroom,the latter offers a more dynamic editing and fine tuning so that's why I changed, don't be afraid to fwk up one or two maybe even a dozen, just learn along with it and try to fix the flaws in every iteration, a Chinese saying I like is It's not uncommon to learn and practice at the same time., just have fun with it! shoooshs!
+3@Mousewithamachinegun123 YOU FIRGOT ME AAAAAAA WHY DIDNT YOU ASK ME TO GO GRAVERAIDING
+3@Graingy the lack of headphone jacks in some newer phones stumps me sometimes, like what do you mean you trust your bluetooth havin ass THAT MUCH
+3@Mousewithamachinegun123 fwked, I'm using a spare home phone to comment this, it's like, exceedingly potato, good thing it still can access the net though, albeit a bit slow
+3@Mousewithamachinegun123 I mean, that's whimsy for ya, as whimsy as the whims of the wind, isn't that right, @Graingy ?
+3@DatTrainGuy19 boy concoction. (I will not give context)
+3@BYardley @Mousewithamachinegun123 MY OATMEAL
+3@Graingy challenge god? I WAS GOD... well before i fell off the ladder and hit my head, now I'm like quater-there, AAAAAAA
+3@Speedhunter thanks lol; it's a somewhat failed concept, and it's not really.. that good I guess? plan to revisit soon, maybe with a bigger ship because it's simpler
+3@AnitaMaxWynn Part Efficient Aircraft
+3why no tag? >:3
+3@OkaNieba I'm curious though, do you know how to use clickable link?
+3hm, what would ground stuff be called though? I already have PEA(Part-Efficient Aircrafts) and planning to add PEW(Part-Efficient Walkers), and honestly.. PEC(Part-Efficient Car) doesn't sound good... or PEG, yeah nah
+3@Pan oh hey, it's you XD
+3@5 I would agree, but annoyance begets a whacking(or two), I'd say I settle enough for his current ban but who knows, man's had a bad track record
+3have you considered stop being annoying? just saying, might be the cause.
@Mousewithamachinegun123 speaking of which, congratulations on Gold!! ( > ~ < )
+3truly a moment
+3MEIN GOTT AAAA YOOOOOO FWKKKK YEEAAAAAA
+3for landing gear? well...
for the gear itself, use..
floor(smooth(GearDown,X))
where X is the delay
for the gear door,
ceil(smooth(GearDown,X))
+3where X is the delay
@ThatKindaWeeb here's Shinano, upload later since i got upload capped
+3those who wish to be intelligent wants it granted, but those who are know that knowledge is only earned.
+3@ZerkkZxe @HanakoSan @WritersCrusadersAirCo thanks y'all XD
+3@Graingy face scrunches
+3