@Eagleman101SP hey, we're all guilty of pirating something :3 though if I recall correctly, Andrew is chill bout it, just support him if you got the wad and you love the game, toot 🎺
I mean with enough mass and spite, you can definitely float an island like a ship.. and anchor it like one.. what if skypark can sail though, now where did I misplaced my sails...
@LunarEclipseSP as along as the part is below 96, is aite; hell, most of my recent builds contain gyroscopes either for stabling or pylon turning, and oddly enough, most of my helicopters don't use them, save for the heavyweights like Mi-26 and the HLH because otherwise they just flip they shtoof
@Panzerwaifu69 well, kinda lmao, to put it simply though.. and in the most Tumblr way, "they're a slцtty fruit", kinkshaming the fruits we are, I suppose lmfao
@TheMouse the I-400 class, or it's shortened Japanese name "Sentoku"(haha yes the knife), is the largest aircraft-carrying submarine ever been put into service, and it was also the biggest submarine during WW2, thus so we go something somewhere somego
@TheMouse uhhhhhhhh... in the Interwar period before WW2, there were seven ships armed with 16in Naval Battery, these were the Japanese Navy's Nagato & Mutsu, British Royal Navy's Nelson & Rodney, and US Navy's Colorado, Maryland, & West Virginia, all these seven were given the moniker of being the "Big Seven" something something
AWWWW A TANK BOAT!!! reminds me of one I made early back then, I think it was X21? it was based on the Indonesian Tank Boat project and its suuuch a goob, it was also when I started getting around ships, man, now I wanna build one again..
@LunarEclipseSP decent, got some day off and uploaded this, and slipped some little building here and there, and also, its going better now on most part, cant complain but it is indeed moving up, sweet ain't it?
@RichardScepton I don't even understand FT lmao, and also, to be honest, you're actually the one that inspired me to make this ship in particular thanks to your Pack of CIWS you've made, I wholeheartedly thank you for said inspiration and push, lol; also, you make some good ships, keep your head up, take pride in that ( ^▽^ )
@LM0418 I'd say to each to their own, but yes, essentially it's made to be Ai-spawnable, and also aimed towards high likelyhood of spawning(the lower the part, the higher the chance), and to some, that limit is expensive and putting it bluntly, not everyone have the quality and handiwork dexterity to be patient and creative with part saving, and since it is a community project (which is somewhat a half-antithesis to MAPA's AI), the quality varies from well, badly replicated, up to the very impressive ones(e.g. ZerowithaslashedO's aircrafts) which have very good amount of effort and skill put into it, I'd say I'm the middle ground of it, but in short, yes, quality varies with skill gaps essentialy.
@Tiper4062 HUS, NGACO XD, gak salah sih lmao, but yes, Part-Efficient Aircraft(PEA), a project for basically low part replicas(including fictional, e.g. ADF-01 FALKEN/ADA-01 ADLER), intended and aimed also like MAPA's AI Series, which allows the aircraft to be automatically spawned if air traffic is enabled ingame, unlike MAPA however, PEA envelops all types and eras of aircraft ranging from helicopters, airships, WWI, Sci-fi, anything is fair game as along as you adhere to the ruleset(p.s. everyone can join)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover @Speedhunter well, if ya feel like taking some of my burden, I would appreciate it as along as you don't mind the sum of extra work, and thanks lmao, and I suppose, approved, criteria of approval is listed on the Rules of the PEA, in particular the most important(as we all know) are realistic-performing and no more than 7 wing parts, some minor one are no more than 60-70 parts(exceptions apply, such as if the shape or necessary details needs more than the maximum part count alloted), at MOST 96 parts, alright? that's all, and thanks again ( ^▽^ )
@Graingy kinda? but I'll run it up... *ahem*, alright, in short, the way that cannon explosions work is by destroying the connections, but cannons also have an "impact damage"(that's what impactDamageScalar is), iirc, the formula is Velocity × IDS ÷ 1, 2, or 3, so even stock cannons do a LOT of damage, oh and, the diameter doesn't matter for damage, but it does for explosions, all credit above from ol Kendog84
okay the explanation is a bit long-shortish, but essentially it's rotators with the Sin and Cos functions(you can take the code from my Syahuur-Dzhamiv walker), as for how to do it.. I personally learned from a tutorial from another game, Space Engineers to be exact XD, rather translatable, Video in question, specifically the "Inline and Sweeping" section
@TTL unpoggers, sus status revoked, have a terrible day.
+2you youngsters and your SKIBIDI SIGMA RIZZ OHIO MRBEAST FEASTABLES LUNCHLY BRAIN
self-harming physics attacks should be outlawed under Geneva conventions.
+2@Eagleman101SP hey, we're all guilty of pirating something :3 though if I recall correctly, Andrew is chill bout it, just support him if you got the wad and you love the game, toot 🎺
+2I mean with enough mass and spite, you can definitely float an island like a ship.. and anchor it like one.. what if skypark can sail though, now where did I misplaced my sails...
+2say, a WW2-based heavy fighter is allowed right? it'll be somewhat oddly modernishly cursed
+210/10 pun, chii approved :3
+2@LunarEclipseSP no torque witchery lmao
+2@LunarEclipseSP as along as the part is below 96, is aite; hell, most of my recent builds contain gyroscopes either for stabling or pylon turning, and oddly enough, most of my helicopters don't use them, save for the heavyweights like Mi-26 and the HLH because otherwise they just flip they shtoof
+2@Grob0s0VBRa sure lmao, and that's a good way to combat fear, at least I think so, dunno
also, eyyyyy
+2@BlackBird7 you know, the color palette fuxks quite right too, mind if I nab it for later use?
+2@Christiant2 pnle :333
+2Somehow feels a little hint of dieselpunky, I like
+2@LunarEclipseSP I mean, that's a replica though right? fictional replica sure, but replica right?
+2@Panzerwaifu69 well, kinda lmao, to put it simply though.. and in the most Tumblr way, "they're a slцtty fruit", kinkshaming the fruits we are, I suppose lmfao
+2shiroh do be ballin, houhhh...
+2@TheMouse the I-400 class, or it's shortened Japanese name "Sentoku"(haha yes the knife), is the largest aircraft-carrying submarine ever been put into service, and it was also the biggest submarine during WW2, thus so we go something somewhere somego
+2@TheMouse uhhhhhhhh... in the Interwar period before WW2, there were seven ships armed with 16in Naval Battery, these were the Japanese Navy's Nagato & Mutsu, British Royal Navy's Nelson & Rodney, and US Navy's Colorado, Maryland, & West Virginia, all these seven were given the moniker of being the "Big Seven" something something
+2AWWWW A TANK BOAT!!! reminds me of one I made early back then, I think it was X21? it was based on the Indonesian Tank Boat project and its suuuch a goob, it was also when I started getting around ships, man, now I wanna build one again..
+2@Graingy chmeese chii-se
+2@LunarEclipseSP it do the hop, and it do the lite, it's the hoplite!! :3
+2@Miraruluna @Taboritsky @TheUltimatePlaneLover thanks lol
+2@Eagleman101SP ho, neat
+2wonderfully low, good one ( ^▽^ ) b
+2@CR929thenewSPplayer @PrussianAirlines @BYardley hi :3
+2@Solent19 HEY, I ONLY STARTED ONE WAR, THATS NOT A LOT, ONE WAR IS NEVER TOO MUCH WAR, WARRRR
+2@Shikikanlunaoffinalglory @126 @MAPA greetings, how ya's? :3
+2@LunarEclipseSP decent, got some day off and uploaded this, and slipped some little building here and there, and also, its going better now on most part, cant complain but it is indeed moving up, sweet ain't it?
+2@CrestelAeronautics @OkaNieba @dekanii greetings :3
+2i love this lmao what
+2@Omoriboy mmm, not really, will be my last build for a long time, but hi ( ^ ~ ^ )
+2@LunarEclipseSP maybe? idk lmao, i'll see it later
+2add tamarind/lemongrass for a tropical refreshing addition :3
+2@RichardScepton I don't even understand FT lmao, and also, to be honest, you're actually the one that inspired me to make this ship in particular thanks to your Pack of CIWS you've made, I wholeheartedly thank you for said inspiration and push, lol; also, you make some good ships, keep your head up, take pride in that ( ^▽^ )
+2s h i p
+2@LunarEclipseSP I'll check it later, still busy with the pile of mailbox that is the notifs, I'm pretty sure there's like 150 or so by far, maybe..
+2@LM0418 I'd say to each to their own, but yes, essentially it's made to be Ai-spawnable, and also aimed towards high likelyhood of spawning(the lower the part, the higher the chance), and to some, that limit is expensive and putting it bluntly, not everyone have the quality and handiwork dexterity to be patient and creative with part saving, and since it is a community project (which is somewhat a half-antithesis to MAPA's AI), the quality varies from well, badly replicated, up to the very impressive ones(e.g. ZerowithaslashedO's aircrafts) which have very good amount of effort and skill put into it, I'd say I'm the middle ground of it, but in short, yes, quality varies with skill gaps essentialy.
+2@Omoriboy ik, that's why you're so familiar sounding lmao, greetings lol
+2@Graingy you are to blame for me being a pandafrog
+2@OkaNieba I have the spawned
+2@Tiper4062 HUS, NGACO XD, gak salah sih lmao, but yes, Part-Efficient Aircraft(PEA), a project for basically low part replicas(including fictional, e.g. ADF-01 FALKEN/ADA-01 ADLER), intended and aimed also like MAPA's AI Series, which allows the aircraft to be automatically spawned if air traffic is enabled ingame, unlike MAPA however, PEA envelops all types and eras of aircraft ranging from helicopters, airships, WWI, Sci-fi, anything is fair game as along as you adhere to the ruleset(p.s. everyone can join)
+2@TheUltimatePlaneLover @Speedhunter well, if ya feel like taking some of my burden, I would appreciate it as along as you don't mind the sum of extra work, and thanks lmao, and I suppose, approved, criteria of approval is listed on the Rules of the PEA, in particular the most important(as we all know) are realistic-performing and no more than 7 wing parts, some minor one are no more than 60-70 parts(exceptions apply, such as if the shape or necessary details needs more than the maximum part count alloted), at MOST 96 parts, alright? that's all, and thanks again ( ^▽^ )
+2also, here's my take on something of the same concept lol, as foxhound said, plopter lmao
+2@Graingy hoh, s n o o t i n d e e d
+2@Graingy kinda? but I'll run it up... *ahem*, alright, in short, the way that cannon explosions work is by destroying the connections, but cannons also have an "impact damage"(that's what impactDamageScalar is), iirc, the formula is Velocity × IDS ÷ 1, 2, or 3, so even stock cannons do a LOT of damage, oh and, the diameter doesn't matter for damage, but it does for explosions, all credit above from ol Kendog84
+2@Graingy lmao
+2@TheMouse get well soon.
+2okay the explanation is a bit long-shortish, but essentially it's rotators with the Sin and Cos functions(you can take the code from my Syahuur-Dzhamiv walker), as for how to do it.. I personally learned from a tutorial from another game, Space Engineers to be exact XD, rather translatable, Video in question, specifically the "Inline and Sweeping" section
+2@LunarEclipseSP PFFFFTT- XD
+2@TheMouse yep, building without a blueprint is actually a hella powerful skill, I personally am not to good with it tbh..
+2@TheMouse ...I don't do disable drag on parts because I need it to perform better more in flight and less more on the landing kek lmao
+2