2,275 Oicraftian Comments

  • 15,000 MPH X-15 9.5 years ago

    Do not exceed 17000 mph. By 19000 mph you lose control and begin shuddering as if you were primed to explode. Stop lying, I know it goes faster ;) What is the secret to this warp drive powered aircraft?

  • MiG-25 Foxbat(Evolved) 9.5 years ago

    Very true. But mine is called a prototype. It is an unfinished product. Now as for the missiles, I have found not a single acceptable cadidate. The one that flies best cannot even get from one island to the other!

  • [CLOSED] Mach challenge 9.5 years ago

    Could you try out B&K's Prototype 103? Maximum speed is 1519 mph at height 35,000 ft with main engines at full power no after burners. It was not build to turn fast but...

  • MiG-25 Foxbat(Evolved) 9.5 years ago

    The competition has tested this craft and wishes to inform this particular competing company to construct a robust aircraft that can take off without the use of a ski jump or open space. Maximum speed is, like the opposing company B&K, not acceptable. B&K's 103 offers 4 more mph at a similar height without as many finicky issues, but is certainly not a winner. B&K also wishes to remind you that these are prototypes. In the words of B&K's external testing division "there is not a doubt in my mind that this is not a refined product. I do not at all doubt that this grandiosely named aircraft is not yet complete. May the best plane win" Best of luck. Atlantian Air Forces

  • Air warship 9.5 years ago

    tis a bit off center (turrets) but deserves a good five stars

  • Ta152 H (KurtTank's Ultimate Butcher Bird) 9.5 years ago

    So much better than mine... Though that isn't saying much... *early Type 8's graves are found*

  • Lockheed P-38 Lightning -improved- 9.5 years ago

    Could you tell us if you intend to add new air intakes? The old ones are a bit bricky and outdated. Parasitic drag reductions? The thrust is not an issue, the parasitic drag should be lowered. Engine mass increase? Older turbo fan allowed for forward connection?@WeeBabySeamus

  • Sonic Dart 9.5 years ago

    It looks like a dart too :)

  • Lockheed P-38 Lightning -improved- 9.5 years ago

    Must polish, must shine, muchs pretty, needs more cookies

  • B&K Prototype 103 9.5 years ago

    Do not maneuver too harshly below 300 mph or above 40,000 ft. You will then go into a spin from which it is nearly impossible to recover.

  • B&K Prototype 103 9.5 years ago

    @RAF1 it is indeed inspired by the Mig 31. Thank you for the rating.

  • KI-84 9.5 years ago

    Most certainly will be. I hold you in high esteem as you know, and I request that you review my aircraft. The new ones. You could also participate in the interceptor competition.

  • KI-84 9.5 years ago

    This Should be updated.

  • B&K Prototype 103 9.5 years ago

    @JacobHardy64 Not exactly. I got up to 1519 mph and realized I was climbing too high, so I did a tiny nose down and got the speed up to 1536 mph and pulled out. It flew at 1535 mph for over 5 minutes. That sounds weird yes?

  • Mitsubishi A6M Zero 9.5 years ago

    Not historically accurate, nevertheless a good build.

  • B&K Prototype 103 9.5 years ago

    @JacobHardy64 thank you, I found the previous to be noticeably inferior to this one, I have not yet created the necessary missiles for this aircraft. You cannot actually get to Mach 2 in this plane just by flying level. For some perverse reason it only passes Mach 2 after you pull out of a very shallow dive and continues to fly perfectly fine at Mach 2...

  • Firefly: Serenity MK3 9.5 years ago

    Sorry for failing you Rohan Senpai, but I have made some new aircraft. Please, I request you review them. I am not afraid of hard critique.

  • MIG-25 Foxbat 9.5 years ago

    minor changes and colouring would be nice, the elegance and the simplicity of it is wonderful. You should make a new one of it.

  • P-47D Thunderbolt 9.5 years ago

    @Scriefers, can you please, please, please test and review my inferior aircraft? Tell me everything that is wrong. Be as blunt as you want.

  • A6M2-N Zero 9.5 years ago

    If it is the A6M2-N then where are the floats?

  • P-47D Thunderbolt 9.5 years ago

    Beautiful, amazing, excellent, I beg of you to review my Type 28 (misnamed Type 8) and Type 26, please, please do.

  • Bf 109 9.5 years ago

    Not very good unfortunately. As a gesture of good will you get a five but her aesthetics and performance are lacking, she does not resemble a single BF 109 example.

  • P-51 Mustang 9.5 years ago

    Wait a second mate. You are from BSCN yes?

  • Curtiss P-40 (Replica) 9.5 years ago

    While not so much a replica, it is very nice to fly. The roll is very smooth, maneuvers are executed with excellent precision and lacking in errors. From what I know it's flight characteristics are quite similar to the real thing. Well done

  • p-51 9.5 years ago

    Could all present test out my Type 8 series? If you want to. Mod.3 is probably the best trainer. As mod 5 is viciously hard to land... I do not mean to advertise, rather I beseech your advice, as you have created a wonderful aircraft

  • Military Services Read 9.5 years ago

    You might want to add credit. @Griffith

  • Military Services Read 9.5 years ago

    Say mate, what are you doing with someone else's plane?

  • EVERYBODY LISTEN 9.6 years ago

    @PlanesOfOld @KingDeadshot @RevolutionaryElite please do enter my challenge for the torpedo, winner will be decided based on popular vote or my own opinion

  • Ultralight Seaplane Challenge 9.6 years ago

    holy buckets

  • Torpedo Bomber Challenge 9.6 years ago

    Remember that this torpedo favours drops at speeds below 400 mph so propeller aircraft are probably your best shot. Also remember that it works best when deployed at about 159 ft and below. Smooth flight is a must for the torpedo which does not require anything on the airplane to function. The little thing at the back is just an ornament

  • German Twin Prop Fighter 9.6 years ago

    @WalrusAircraft, @Authros, senpai's, can you participate in my torpedo bomber challenge? Please?

  • Type 1B torpedo carried by plane 9.6 years ago

    Must it be unrated, must it be? No "nice torpedo" or other cookies for me to munch on?

  • JP-27 Torpedo Bomber 9.6 years ago

    Nevermind, trials show that this aircraft is a tad bit unsuited to operations with the torpedo

  • JP-27 Torpedo Bomber 9.6 years ago

    Senpai, may I use your airplane for my Type 1B air dropped autonomous torpedo? (Independent propulsion)

  • Thank You for Gold 9.6 years ago

    Rohan sensei, can you test torpedoes Type 1A and Type 1B? Type 1A is better, type 1B is airdrop

  • Working type 1A torpedo with launching device 9.6 years ago

    Sorry for being so late, making a working torpedo took so many bloody tries. Although most were killed for being too big... Anyway, it's designed to be air dropped or used by ships, go figure

  • Very large torpedo 9.6 years ago

    It keeps on crashing my game...

  • Very large torpedo 9.6 years ago

    @ElijtheGeat it's jet powered, but not super cavitating, it sort of feels off. Anyway, good build, I would rate it if I could actually download it lol

  • Jumbo 9.7 years ago

    Copy cat BAD! No Cookie!

  • Lockheed EC-121 Warning Star 9.7 years ago

    You know, if I could actually download this plane I could say something other than that it's really bloody beautiful lol

  • P-47 Thunderbolt 9.7 years ago

    Err, the wings are a tad bit off

  • F/A-24 Diamondback 9.7 years ago

    @Spikerya, how is my operable improved version without the quick to break landing gear?

  • PLAF J—10 9.7 years ago

    Soo good... You make me jealous... It's so bloody perfect

  • A Plane In WW1 9.7 years ago

    Only one problem. It rolls like a flying cow.

  • FA-24 Improved 9.7 years ago

    Wait, no, my qualifier question mark "?"! Noooo! Now improved literally means improved rather than possibly improved!

  • Aqua dromonem XVI 9.7 years ago

    Amazing, just amazing, you deserve a cookie!

  • Very large torpedo 9.7 years ago

    No offence, but isn't that a missile?

  • Project 34 9.7 years ago

    I'm making a bigger version, but for now, I'm bit busy so, you'll have to wait for it (my apologies here of course)

  • Project 34 9.7 years ago

    please fix the nose to stay with the original project 34. And move the special gear up forward below the cockpit? please?

  • Project 34 9.7 years ago

    noo! my planes beautiful Center! The nose! it's gone! lol. But seriously, pls fix that (nose)