@Supermini555 If he is a part of Patrena, he already has an arsenal of tanks and other weapons to use.
Also, this vehicle would create logistics issues due to having originated in another nation . . . one that doesn't use Patrenan measurements. It also mounts a gun, whose caliber is used solely by Awwam.
@BaconRoll Thanks, also, you can just pretend that this is painted as if it is a part of your military . . . as I will retain the ESR's standard scheme.
A .50 cal weapon isn't able to preform as a recee's weapon . . . a recee is meant to be an armed recon vehicle . . . able to kill other vehicles.
A HMG may not be able to kill many other recon vehicles. @Pilotmario
My main complaints about them, other than them being under armored, copies that forfeit many intergral features of the Piranha, is how the U.S. decides to use them.
They decided to use a variant of the Stryker, costing upwards of 11 million dollars, as a Reece vehicle. They then made it a scout as well . . . basically a armored, all terain school bus, armed with a .50 cal MG . . . meant to preform the role of armed reconnaissance and sneaky peaky.
It isn't armed well enough to preform a Recee role and is too large to preform scout roles.
This same thing has been repeated with the Bradley . . . which is an even worse choice for a recon vehicle.
-It is too slow to go out in front of other armor
-It is massive
-Ith has limited visibility
-It has narrow tracks . . . and quite high ground pressure
-It is under armored, unable to withstand heavy machine guns frontally
-It is oddly armored, protected from 30mm auto cannons from the sides
-The turret has no true basket, which is a gernerally bad idea.
-The fuel and ammunition is stored directly under the passengers
-Supposedly amphibious, but not anymore
. . .
I am going to stop now . . .
@Pilotmario
Umm, it is pretty bad when compared to the Mowag . . . but it still isn't the same travesty as a M2.
Also, the U.S. millitay operates a 6x6 variant of the V-150, as a base security and VIP transport vehicle. @Pilotmario
Never, ever, in the history of wheeled vehicles . . . base anything on that horrible vehicle.
Unless you are just replicating the shape......ummm.....what is the French APC called? @Pilotmario
One of the rotors would slow slightly, and then the craft with rotate similarly to using a tail rotor.
Not in how it works, but the motion would be similar. @Pilotmario
@Pilotmario Then aigian the type was meant to forgo a tail rotor, but its method of yaw control would be one of the hardest things to pull off in game . . . you can . . . but not easily.
We are developing those as well, but, as of now I am desperate for a XMLed landing gear set.....I just spent about40 minutes searching for one.....on I go! @Pilotmario
@Supermini555 If he is a part of Patrena, he already has an arsenal of tanks and other weapons to use.
Also, this vehicle would create logistics issues due to having originated in another nation . . . one that doesn't use Patrenan measurements. It also mounts a gun, whose caliber is used solely by Awwam.
You don't need, and probably don't want, these. @Alix451
What nation are you from? @Alix451
@Pilotmario Same place as the MBT-9H
@DankDorito It is a very square design, not capitalizing on armor angling.
@TemDesBur Carpet bomb his square tanks . .
@DankDorito No . . .it is a functional problem in modern combat, and the Suleimani has many problems.
@TemDesBur Why?
@TemDesBur Dear god . . no . . no . . just no.
@TheBroadside It makes . . . then change it.
@TheBroadside Umm, APCs aren direct combat vehicle . . . MBTs and IFVs are . . . at least a APC-6B has an angled front hull.
@Pilotmario MBT-9P . . . this has a very similar turret.
@RAF1 Youz hold da tank challenge.
@RAF1 Why not make a challenge yourself? @RAF1
It is a rectangle . . .
@PyrusEnderhunter So it cannot . . .
@PyrusEnderhunter How large was the weapon?
@Pilotmario The over-hang seems a little . . . very . . . excessive.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation We still have 40 LF/B-3Bs making runs over Awwam daily . . .
@Pilotmario By we, I meant the US . . . not in the RP.
@Pilotmario Oh, yeah I did . . .
@BaconRoll Actually, I didn't paint it that scheme for a reason . . . because I think it is ugly.
@BaconRoll Okay . ..
@BaconRoll Thanks, also, you can just pretend that this is painted as if it is a part of your military . . . as I will retain the ESR's standard scheme.
@Tully2001 The lines look to thin to be French.
This@Tully2001
@Tully2001 Well, remember the Union Jack . . . .
@Tully2001 I think they meant British . . .
@Pilotmario Yes they would, but we don't arm vehicles to suit certain roles.
@Pilotmario I don't think I stated the mass . .
A .50 cal weapon isn't able to preform as a recee's weapon . . . a recee is meant to be an armed recon vehicle . . . able to kill other vehicles.
A HMG may not be able to kill many other recon vehicles. @Pilotmario
My main complaints about them, other than them being under armored, copies that forfeit many intergral features of the Piranha, is how the U.S. decides to use them.
They decided to use a variant of the Stryker, costing upwards of 11 million dollars, as a Reece vehicle. They then made it a scout as well . . . basically a armored, all terain school bus, armed with a .50 cal MG . . . meant to preform the role of armed reconnaissance and sneaky peaky.
It isn't armed well enough to preform a Recee role and is too large to preform scout roles.
This same thing has been repeated with the Bradley . . . which is an even worse choice for a recon vehicle.
-It is too slow to go out in front of other armor
-It is massive
-Ith has limited visibility
-It has narrow tracks . . . and quite high ground pressure
-It is under armored, unable to withstand heavy machine guns frontally
-It is oddly armored, protected from 30mm auto cannons from the sides
-The turret has no true basket, which is a gernerally bad idea.
-The fuel and ammunition is stored directly under the passengers
-Supposedly amphibious, but not anymore
. . .
I am going to stop now . . .
@Pilotmario
Umm, it is pretty bad when compared to the Mowag . . . but it still isn't the same travesty as a M2.
Also, the U.S. millitay operates a 6x6 variant of the V-150, as a base security and VIP transport vehicle. @Pilotmario
The VAB or Mowag Piraña...... @Pilotmario
However, a 6x6 version of this may work. @Pilotmario
Never, ever, in the history of wheeled vehicles . . . base anything on that horrible vehicle.
Unless you are just replicating the shape......ummm.....what is the French APC called? @Pilotmario
Cadillac Cage V-150!! @Pilotmario
You may be able to make it do so . . . @Pilotmario
Thank, what do you think of it? @Dawidxxd
One of the rotors would slow slightly, and then the craft with rotate similarly to using a tail rotor.
Not in how it works, but the motion would be similar. @Pilotmario
. . . Umm, impossible would be the correct term . . .as I am an iOS user. @Pilotmario
@Pilotmario Then aigian the type was meant to forgo a tail rotor, but its method of yaw control would be one of the hardest things to pull off in game . . . you can . . . but not easily.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation I wasn't even trying to gain him as a member, I don't care what he does . . .
@Pilotmario Go ahead . . .
Doesn't an M103 mount a 120 or 105? @TemDesBur
12-14....@TemDesBur
Sorry, upload limit. @Tully2001
@Pilotmario Yeah . . . we could have however that is often brakes things . . .
Find one five minutes after commenting. . . @Pilotmario
We are developing those as well, but, as of now I am desperate for a XMLed landing gear set.....I just spent about40 minutes searching for one.....on I go! @Pilotmario