64.4k PapaKernels Comments

  • Münster G34 Prototype 9 months ago

    Looks like a sauber c9. Nice!

  • My fellow americans 9 months ago

    @X99STRIKER seems to be getting goofier and goofier each day but I still love it lol

    +3
  • My fellow americans 9 months ago

    @OrangeConnor2 @jamesPLANESii respectfully disagree lol

    +2
  • Huge Thanks to all my friends ! (alphabetical, can you believe it ?) 9 months ago

    @Zaineman np brother! Lol, tbh I noticed but it took a little bit lol. Is very funny

  • Huge Thanks to all my friends ! (alphabetical, can you believe it ?) 9 months ago

    @Zaineman lol yep your good.
    My man's can assemble an army bigger than some country's with everyone lol.

  • Lol 10 months ago

    The superior form of measurement I might add

    +1
  • Huge Thanks to all my friends ! (alphabetical, can you believe it ?) 10 months ago

    Man there an active user not on this list lol. Gonna have to bring out the mile long scroll to decree everyone lmao

    +3
  • Whopper 10 months ago

    @dekanii erm actually a big Mac has a bun in the middle and is two Patty's compared to a whoppers single patty 🤓☝️

    +1
  • Whopper 10 months ago

    whopper whopper, junior double at bk, have it your way, you rule!

  • the most 'Murican sofa 10 months ago

    Damn yalls got mini guns on yours?! I only got a madeuce man, that's dumb.

  • ‘Merica Challenge 10 months ago

    Ooo or I might do a short track car. American short track racing is a whole new breed.

    +1
  • ‘Merica Challenge 10 months ago

    Welp looks like my ford nascar will be for this now lol. Can't think of anything more American than NASCAR

    +1
  • 2jz engine 10 months ago

    @AceA1 no just a model. You can add an engine part and it'll work but. Engines in this game are just for looks.

  • [Prop] Simple Colt M1911 Model 1911 10 months ago

    "Don't need nothing but mah 45"

  • Project-6X3 (LMP) 10 months ago

    Very underrated builder my friend. Absolutely beautiful work from the tubing to the body shaping. Can't wait to see what you cook up next

    +1
  • 2jz engine 10 months ago

    @MrCOPTY yea ik what your talking about. Hey I guess that's how things go tho. I like the supra, cool looking car and from what I hear is a very good handling and stout car with an engine that is very easy to add power so I get alot of the hype but also 2.1 mil for a Japanese comuter is pretty crazy.

    +1
  • 2jz engine 10 months ago

    @MrCOPTY lmao, was thinking about that too. Actually saw a mk.4 right hand drive strolling around my town which was really cool. Think the first mk.4 I ever saw in person. Looked super clean

    +1
  • 2jz engine 10 months ago

    Tags requested

  • 2jz engine 10 months ago

    @ThanhKilometer

  • 2jz engine 10 months ago

    @Pakkoyan @DatFiat126Fan19 @Nyamomin

  • (TEASER) Struggle turns to triumph 10 months ago

    @TheNewSPplayer rn it's at 1500 💀. Honestly expect 1700-2000 by the time I'm done with the livery and everything. Pretty much overhauling the current interior as well as redoing the engine and exhaust.

  • (TEASER) Struggle turns to triumph 10 months ago

    @rexzion ikr? I really like how it came out. First time attempting it. Custom rims as well (totally not 80 parts each). And yea I kinda agree but honestly like it more than the older ones. And drive model will be as close to realistic as I can get it. Got a control base suspension so hoping that will help alot

  • Acura NSX GT3 evo 10 months ago

    Looks dope as hell. Love gt cars so much

    +1
  • 1997 Mercedes Benz CLK GTR 10 months ago

    @KevPlayzz how the game is bro.

  • A small question for top gear fans 10 months ago

    @MrSilverWolf welp looks like this is what I'll make. Think I might make a hilux for shits and giggles as well.

    +3
  • (Potato) Mercedes Benz CLR 10 months ago

    I love the clr but man there are pretty much no good blueprints for it or I prolly would have made one a long time ago after my clk gtr. Looks pretty damn good for how simple it is

    +1
  • A small question for top gear fans 10 months ago

    @Tingly06822 ah ok, thank you for the clarification lol

  • New car! 10 months ago

    If you want something that will be pretty easy, go with pretty much any 70s- 80s car, or some sort of panel van

  • A small question for top gear fans 10 months ago

    @Tingly06822 for clarification, is that the same one they stress tested by blowing up a building with it on it and all that?

  • (TEASER) JDM POWER!! 10 months ago

    @hpgbproductions I wish. Idk how I could make it work but ik imma do a turbo 2j. Might see if I can model a turbo400 tranny to for it. Maybe will do a 3 or 4 speed tho idk. Tbh I kinda wanna see if I can make some tbm brakes and some motion raceworks stuff and build so cool drag cars.

  • (TEASER) JDM POWER!! 10 months ago

    @Graingy lol ah yea I guess that is kinda true. I wanted to do it because I've never been the best at building engines so I wanted to practice so I can make better ones.

    +1
  • (TEASER) JDM POWER!! 10 months ago

    @Graingy how so?

  • A small question for top gear fans 10 months ago

    @BYardley I never was really able to watch much of anything I wanted being the youngest kid in the house so I only saw a few episodes here and there unfortunately. And ok. Honestly a pretty sick car. Will definitely keep in mind.

    +1
  • A small question for top gear fans 10 months ago

    @Artutu honestly I was really thinking about that one lol

  • (TEASER) JDM POWER!! 10 months ago

    @Eggplant lmao, yep. I use to be a hater then I saw what those things could do stock and it made me believe. Should make a modern version that's even more bullet proof lol

  • Chrysler D'Elegance 1952 10 months ago

    @NINJ4 yep your good. I'm getting mixed up with some other info lol.

  • Chrysler D'Elegance 1952 10 months ago

    @NINJ4 ok, I am sorry but I was wrong. It was first made in 51. Maybe was the big block hemi that came out in the mid 60s...

  • Chrysler D'Elegance 1952 10 months ago

    @NINJ4 ok.imma look it up and see lol. As far as I know it was for nascar or drag racing that's why they first made it and it was in the mid 60s.

  • Chrysler D'Elegance 1952 10 months ago

    Wait I thought hemis didn't come out until the mid 60s? V8s as we know them I though weren't super popular until the small block chevy in around I think 1954-55. I could be wrong but that's the information I remember lol. Cool car

  • supercharger 10 months ago

    @Graingy ok. Yea. Yea, honestly I'm not super familiar with all that. I'm American so I only know horsepower and big vroom vrooms lol

  • an average day on multiplayer 10 months ago

    Sick! Saw Linus with his car and the Texan, looks fun. Wonder how big it would be with sp2.

  • supercharger 10 months ago

    @Graingy in reference to your reply to gzzzz, a screw Is different to a turbine. I suggest looking up a supercharger screw so you can understand what it looks like. Torque is VERY important. Torque is what makes diesel engines so good in trucking and other applications. If you've ever seen a Tractor trailer rising up a little bit when coming off a red light, that's the Torque twisting the drive train and frame to get itself underway with its heavy load. Torque in a drag racing sense I think is what helps get off the line quickly.
    In reference to my reply, I may have? It's been about 4-5 years sense we did engines in my auto tech class, it was during covid, and I dint think we really covered it extensively so I may be getting it wrong. Torque and kw is the same thing to my knowledge? Idk tho, I'm American so I only like hp/ftlbs Torque so lol

  • toiletta 10 months ago

    A shit post literally

    +17
  • supercharger 10 months ago

    @qzzzz pro chargers are pretty much belt driven, but you can have crank driven ones too. Pretty much it's a belt driven turbo. Crank driven ones are more for high horsepower as belt driven would be way to much stress on the engine

  • supercharger 10 months ago

    @Graingy well in a way yes, basically a turbine but instead of pulling air throught it it compresses it and then it goes into the motor.
    For different mechanisms, I'm pretty sure superchargers were made looooonnnnngggg before turbos, if my memory is correct a camshaft driven one was one 1910s-20s Mercedes which was mounted in the rear and not on top. Not super familiar with the mechanism but that was used then alot on aircraft applications, the the screw design was created. Like qzzzz said they offer superior low end torque which in a drag racing sense torque is great for getting you off the line quickly and is good to push you through the quarter mile, where as horsepower to my knowledge and inferring is more of being able to sustain higher top speed and really getting your time down. Low end torque is also really good in burnout cars as you can light up the rear tires very efficiently and quickly and keeps the reving down lower which helps with engine life. Plus a screw system is pretty much ++ next to each other and twisted and making that reliable at a very high rpm would be alot especially concerning all the rotating mass, it would prolly blow it apart in say a v8 car, but having a small one in a little 4 cylinder like the Ariel atom it can hold a little more rpm.
    Turbos to my knowledge are a little bit easier to tune in power sense it's not directly on the engine it's on the outside and has the charge piping that you can add a waste gate to and can better tune in how much boost you make getting off the line, and then can slowly add it back in going out the back end of a quarter mile. Superchargers on the other hand if you want to change the amount of boost you have to change the actual pully and isn't easily computer tuneable at a moments notice. If you want to lower your power you would have to tune timing, or something, or just get on it easier out the hole if it's not going down the track. Sorry I really tismed on that lol

    +1
  • supercharger 10 months ago

    @qzzzz like a pro charger? Is that what your asking about?

  • supercharger 10 months ago

    @Graingy yea honestly I couldn't imagine the supercharger screws needed for something like that lol. Would prolly be way to much rotating mass lol. Turbos at that rate are pretty much jet turbines at that rate.

    +1
  • supercharger 10 months ago

    @Graingy honestly there is still a level of wanting to be efficient, just not when it comes to fuel but most professionals use alternative fuel. And ah well I mean in a regular road car yea, having a turbo is more efficient, obviously. Best way to add easy power and keep it in a small package I will agree with that. But for me, If I pull up next to someone and they look at ya and you know you gotta dust some poor chump, I want a supercharger and just use that torque to pull me out of the hole better.

    +1
  • supercharger 10 months ago

    @Graingy lol, I went to school for it so I'd say so ya lol. And NHRA is drag racing where I'm talking about so acceleration is 1000000% a big thing. There are ways around turbo lag like line lock systems, which in auto cars is often called getting on the converter. Now in a racing left right thing I would see where turbo would be better, smoother power delivery which is more controllable but also may loose time in big straight sections

    +1
  • supercharger 10 months ago

    Superchargers are also pretty good if you wanna save space and much simpler so less things to break. Turbos got charge tubing, intercooler, and a whole new header that will take up more space than just regular headers. Plus you get instant torque, no lag and your intercooler is as far as my knowledge is right under the supercharger screws, so all you need is a little vertical space so fitting it in smaller cars is easier than a turbo.