if you just need the parts to be connected, you can set the conection point (0,1,2,3,4,5....) to any number you want, it wont matter. if using rotators, 0 is always the rotating side.
also, multiple parts can be connected to just one side of an item.
e.g. you can connect as many parts to the front of a fuselage as you want
you have got 4 numbers there. the Id of part a and b and the connections.
you can find out the id of a part by looking into the xml, maybe press ctrl+f to search so you know wich parts you want to connect.
the other numbers define at wich point the connections are.
e.g. a fuselage has 6 (0,1,2,3,4,5) 0 being the front.
these numbers are in the same order as part a and be (meaning that the last number is the one for B...)
as the col moves closer to the com, the airplane becomes more maneuverable.
less ft/lbs (wheigt per wingsurface) increases both maneuverability and stability.
theres an odd thing in simplePlanes, when you use a control surface the effect it creates in calculated for the middle of the wing, meaning that if the middle of the wing is on or on front of the COM, the pitch has hardly any effect or is inverted.
the last thing are the engines. the COT should be in the same level as the COM, else your plane will try to push up- or downwards.
@IzzyIA the look is not the progblem, but i think it would be way cooler if you would make some kind of gear that slows down the transmission bar, just like when you´re driving in 3rd gear and then hift to reverse
@Fighterpilot91 this is the best thing i can offer to you, but the handling is complicated. you need to lock and then press an Ag so they are pretty limited in number...
@Thederpingmemes here you go.
the green one has original mass (8000x the realistic mass for this size), the blue one´s mass is ine the right scale (0.000125)
@Texasfam04 idk, its 7 balls with a diameter of .125...
i have pretty much no idea what one would use this for
@FalconGT12
-stop the car
-press 6
-slowly drive away and deactivate 6
@Boatrider it looks actually fairly good considering the low partcount
sounds interesting,
you can upload pictures at pasteboard.co so i understand what you mean
@Simpleplaner656 sadly they have fixed the feature that made this work, sorry
@robloxweponco thanks
@GhostSquadren it doesnt work, sorry
@Simpleplaner656 ok, ill try
@Firewolf247 try it
@Firewolf247 sure, ill do it as soon as i can
if you just need the parts to be connected, you can set the conection point (0,1,2,3,4,5....) to any number you want, it wont matter. if using rotators, 0 is always the rotating side.
also, multiple parts can be connected to just one side of an item.
e.g. you can connect as many parts to the front of a fuselage as you want
you have got 4 numbers there. the Id of part a and b and the connections.
you can find out the id of a part by looking into the xml, maybe press ctrl+f to search so you know wich parts you want to connect.
the other numbers define at wich point the connections are.
e.g. a fuselage has 6 (0,1,2,3,4,5) 0 being the front.
these numbers are in the same order as part a and be (meaning that the last number is the one for B...)
why do i need ears?
@lliamlegoguy very cool
@JordenMillar yeah ik but whats your question
@JordenMillar idk, what do you mean?
as the col moves closer to the com, the airplane becomes more maneuverable.
less ft/lbs (wheigt per wingsurface) increases both maneuverability and stability.
theres an odd thing in simplePlanes, when you use a control surface the effect it creates in calculated for the middle of the wing, meaning that if the middle of the wing is on or on front of the COM, the pitch has hardly any effect or is inverted.
the last thing are the engines. the COT should be in the same level as the COM, else your plane will try to push up- or downwards.
your projects look really cool btw
pretty cool idea, i think you should make a uservoice post!
@destroyerP you have to download mp! it's awesome!
and unless i'm on it works without lags.
hey @WNP78, can you make a mod that shows you the koordinates of COM, COL AND COT? i think that'd be really helpful, sometimes. thanks in advance
some day it will say "coming"
+1@ColonelStriker
@PilotOfFuture sorry, aint had no time today, i'll try to do it tomorrow
@ColonelStriker gonna do it tomorrow
link
@SEVEN7H i made it a little to dark and glossy... just realized
but i think its still not dark enough for steel
@IzzyIA the look is not the progblem, but i think it would be way cooler if you would make some kind of gear that slows down the transmission bar, just like when you´re driving in 3rd gear and then hift to reverse
it´s really cool, but why did you design the brakes like that? great job anyways
@Mostly
-food vaporizes-
Mostly: perfect.
@DannyBoyToTheDoctor lol
"Airbus Passenger Airplanes are using advanced technology, l have some interesting evidence"
+1he is right, aviation is advanced technology...
@Fighterpilot91 hope its ok
@Fighterpilot91 this is the best thing i can offer to you, but the handling is complicated. you need to lock and then press an Ag so they are pretty limited in number...
@Fighterpilot91 no chance, sorry.
if you are talking about the joystick inside the cockpit, try the
+1damperMultiplier
tag for rotators.i dont know if it will work, its just an idea
@Thederpingmemes here you go.
the green one has original mass (8000x the realistic mass for this size), the blue one´s mass is ine the right scale (0.000125)
im glad he had so much time here on earth tho he had asl, rip
@UFNNICF5TF i'll try
@goboygo1 i know da wae... i guess...
im not a meme expert tbh...
@plane918273645 nope, it has nothing to do with sp
@Tully2001 i think thats not the problem... i saved the images with paint.net...
have you already seen this
because a low gold user thinks about 10 upvotes better than a med-high plat user
@Hayhayjam664 thanks in the Name of all mobile users
@TMR9001 sadly not, this is the best Thing i can offer to you
@KidKromosone you know how to scale i guess, like with finetuner or overload. just set the scale of the wings 0,0,0 and they should still work
+1i knew it would look more intiminating with that prop...
+2but you know you can make wings scale 0 and they still work? great work anyways.
i wonder if it'd look better with a propeller nose...
+2@CDRxavier thanks
@CDRxavier i made it back in the time where we didnt have flares, and they were the best working flares i found. now you can use the games ones, ok?