@Randomplayer The final plane will actually be heavily modded so it runs smoothly, but there will be a no mods cargo version with less overall details.
@Randomplayer Well actually because of mods there won't be a true part count, however I estimate the total number of SP parts in the 3D models to be over 20,000, and the final part count will be 2000 parts, most of that being the cockpit.
@ToeTips Fun fact: If I were to assemble a no mods version with a full interior, my computer would implode. Instead I get away by building stuff in different files, then modding it.
@HuskyDynamics01 Possibly. I'm now making physical rivets because labels don't export correctly to 3D models.
I'm going to mod all this so it will turn into about 30 parts max instead of 600.
@jamesPLANESii This feels like a bot post since the user joined immediately before posting this forum. It also just sounds like a header post for the chain bot comments which say good things about some person or thing.
Also as a YouTuber myself, I just do my own thing, although I put in some effort to improve my videos.
@KingHandspider I guess the whole system is thousands.
An actual data storage for a 6 character string is two variables. You need some additional code to handle the input device, and a stacked multiselector to display different characters.
While it is possible to achieve ultimate realism if you combine over 2 years of hard work with a quality airport, you will struggle to run this smoothly on even the best computer with today's hardware. That being said, SP is a good game to build planes. If I wanted to fly a complex airliner, I would probably get myself a flight simulator. Instead I've spent over 2 years building a plane with flight simulator realism, while learning a lot about complex aircraft systems along the way.
@Ilovewillow The HUDs and PFDs are heavily modified versions of existing parts. They use many aircraft system variables such as the autopilot, and would be extremely difficult to upload on their own.
You can find the original PFD here, and the original HUD here.
Tags were a good idea. You posted teasers, and users who wished to be tagged said T. Asking for tags wasn't even a purpose at all. Autotags, however, are kind of a spammy/attention-ish-grabbing/upvote-begging-ish idea. There may be some innocence to the concept but it's kind of gotten out of hand.
@jamesPLANESii Do you happen to have a copy of this mod? It just came to my attention that I don't have this mod saved and I'm trying to get it.
Thanks in advance!
@HuskyDynamics01 SPVR is a standalone game, which is just the VR aspect. SimplePlanes by itself is not VR. Buying both unlocks VR in the base game, allowing you to enter VR right after building something. You only need SPVR to fly in VR.
I've seen all the edits...
You removed the "whoever gets it right receives 5 upvotes text after changing it to a different language".
Also, the plane in question has been removed, so the image isn't showing up.
@ToeTips I don't have a specific label, unfortunately. The logos in my profile, while being the actual logos, were made at least 5 years ago by someone who just wanted to quickly create a Gravatar image. I have plans to update them at some point, which will likely be when I start work on the liveries.
Yep, this plane has more theoretical parts than the Yamato (plus it has thousands of variables and insanely complex systems).
@ToeTips Sure, you can use any one of the four.
About the update, this will not affect the SWL-120 in any way. I have many plans for the future; SP has been the only game I've played in the last few months, and it has been the main game for the last few years. In fact, I've recently ramped up SWL-120 production with more free time.
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes Exactly. I've been working on my SWL-120 for 2 years now, with plans to refine and further improve it next year, and I am still very interested in SP. In fact, it's the only game I've played at all the last few months.
@maddogfike @MADDOGLUCAS @MobileBuilder21 The post literally says they are not adding any more features to SimplePlanes. Asking for updates will get you nowhere.
If there is no "cockpit" camera (appears after flyby view) available, using the "previous view" input does not loop continuously. I'm not sure how else to explain it. For example, let's say I have a craft with no custom cameras at all, and the cockpit camera (on the primary cockpit part) set to "disabled". If I press "C", I can continuously cycle through all views forever. However, if I use the keybind "Shift + C" (or any custom ones, like the back side button on my mouse), I get stuck at chase view. If I then enable the cockpit camera or add a custom camera (basically adding a cockpit view camera position), I can cycle backwards continuously.
To sum up the paragraph above, if there is no default cockpit view, the previous camera input will stop at chase view.
bug
If a part outputting to a variable (such as a shock) is destroyed, a bunch of null reference exceptions (NullReferenceException) appear in the debug console. I'm not sure what exactly triggers this as it only happens sometimes. I have a specific plane this happens on (I've seen it on other crafts as well) which I can tag you on if required.
@Randomplayer The final plane will actually be heavily modded so it runs smoothly, but there will be a no mods cargo version with less overall details.
@Sense2 I said implode because funny
@Randomplayer Well actually because of mods there won't be a true part count, however I estimate the total number of SP parts in the 3D models to be over 20,000, and the final part count will be 2000 parts, most of that being the cockpit.
@LM0418 Thanks!
@ToeTips Fun fact: If I were to assemble a no mods version with a full interior, my computer would implode. Instead I get away by building stuff in different files, then modding it.
@HuskyDynamics01 Possibly. I'm now making physical rivets because labels don't export correctly to 3D models.
+1I'm going to mod all this so it will turn into about 30 parts max instead of 600.
This looks nice but please don't tag me in future teasers.
+1This ip is one of the main servers.
+1@jamesPLANESii This feels like a bot post since the user joined immediately before posting this forum. It also just sounds like a header post for the chain bot comments which say good things about some person or thing.
+1Also as a YouTuber myself, I just do my own thing, although I put in some effort to improve my videos.
...
+1@KingHandspider I guess the whole system is thousands.
An actual data storage for a 6 character string is two variables. You need some additional code to handle the input device, and a stacked multiselector to display different characters.
I made a multiselector that converts numbers to characters, but it's really long and complicated and has thousands of variables.
+1No.
Imgur doesn't work as a file host for SP, use imgbb.com or postimages.org.
While it is possible to achieve ultimate realism if you combine over 2 years of hard work with a quality airport, you will struggle to run this smoothly on even the best computer with today's hardware. That being said, SP is a good game to build planes. If I wanted to fly a complex airliner, I would probably get myself a flight simulator. Instead I've spent over 2 years building a plane with flight simulator realism, while learning a lot about complex aircraft systems along the way.
+5@Ilovewillow The HUDs and PFDs are heavily modified versions of existing parts. They use many aircraft system variables such as the autopilot, and would be extremely difficult to upload on their own.
You can find the original PFD here, and the original HUD here.
T
Tags were a good idea. You posted teasers, and users who wished to be tagged said T. Asking for tags wasn't even a purpose at all. Autotags, however, are kind of a spammy/attention-ish-grabbing/upvote-begging-ish idea. There may be some innocence to the concept but it's kind of gotten out of hand.
+2@jamesPLANESii Thanks, I would appreciate that.
@jamesPLANESii Do you happen to have a copy of this mod? It just came to my attention that I don't have this mod saved and I'm trying to get it.
Thanks in advance!
Something JamesPlanesii wrote
The German Corsair has its comments section disabled. There is nothing you can do about that.
+1Thank you for this game. It is literally the only thing I play now.
+1I have one question, where can I find the latest modtools? Are they at this link?
@HuskyDynamics01 SPVR is a standalone game, which is just the VR aspect. SimplePlanes by itself is not VR. Buying both unlocks VR in the base game, allowing you to enter VR right after building something. You only need SPVR to fly in VR.
+3Good plane
+1@Graingy haha I might actually think of making a TLDR lol. These progress updates are getting a little long.
@WisconsinStatePolice Realism is possible, if you spend 3 years on it. I don't know the first thing about fighter jets though...
+1Here
+2Interesting! You should really try and practice building a proper airfoil, which shouldn't be much harder than this.
@Graingy yeah I really do, can't be bothered to manually type out interesting combinations.
@Graingy kiskich gnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicskickicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh ggnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicskickicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicfsh gnifsh gskickicskich gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnfsh gnifsh gifsh gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gfish kiching fisck h gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicfsh gnifsh gskickicskich gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnfsh gnifsh gifsh gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gfish kiching fisck h gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicfsh gnifsh gskickicskich gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnfsh gnifsh gifsh gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gfish kiching fisck h gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicfsh gnifsh gskickicskich gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnfsh gnifsh gifsh gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gfish kiching fisck h gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicfsh gnifsh gskickicskich gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnfsh gnifsh gifsh gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gfish kiching fisck h gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickish gh gnfsh gnifsh gifsh gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gfish kiching fisck h gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicfsh gnifsh gskickicskich gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnfsh gnifsh gifsh gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gfish kiching fisck h gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicfshsh gh gnfsh gnifsh gifsh gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gfish kiching fisck h gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicfsh gnifsh gskickicskich gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gh gnfsh gnifsh gifsh gnifsfsh gnifsh gh gnifsh gh gnifsh gnifsh gfish kiching fisck h gnifgnifskicskicskicskich gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifsh gnifskicskickicskickicfsh gnifsh gskickicski
+1@Graingy baibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboriicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocuibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtfigtfeocgqrubtfvrbuvboritfgbvowfeuboviyugqfndsufndicnqftqrncifnecunyfpuycfnbaibfsicnyndkxifadyasdfiubforeufvabftbrgpqvgtfocugtf
@Graingy idk how to further warp the letters in the name so you win lol
@Graingy Kick Fishing
@CrazyEngine That number is 3.75, which does not seem right.
@CrazyEngine F-18 Hornet
Well it looks almost identical to your post called "Blue Fang".
Blue Fang
I've seen all the edits...
You removed the "whoever gets it right receives 5 upvotes text after changing it to a different language".
Also, the plane in question has been removed, so the image isn't showing up.
@32 It's not even that uncommon, as they are the ones doing the curation.
Where's this "proof" you speak of?
+3As someone who recently posted a scripted mod, and wrote a crystal clear pinned comment, I agree.
@ToeTips I have made the logo some time ago but it's not very good quality. You can find it on one of the planes in this list and this list.
@ToeTips I don't have a specific label, unfortunately. The logos in my profile, while being the actual logos, were made at least 5 years ago by someone who just wanted to quickly create a Gravatar image. I have plans to update them at some point, which will likely be when I start work on the liveries.
Yep, this plane has more theoretical parts than the Yamato (plus it has thousands of variables and insanely complex systems).
@ToeTips Sure, you can use any one of the four.
+1About the update, this will not affect the SWL-120 in any way. I have many plans for the future; SP has been the only game I've played in the last few months, and it has been the main game for the last few years. In fact, I've recently ramped up SWL-120 production with more free time.
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes Exactly. I've been working on my SWL-120 for 2 years now, with plans to refine and further improve it next year, and I am still very interested in SP. In fact, it's the only game I've played at all the last few months.
+5Fixed. The switch did not have an interactionType set and therefore couldn't unset the value of the variable.
Send me the plane and I'll have a look
@maddogfike @MADDOGLUCAS @MobileBuilder21 The post literally says they are not adding any more features to SimplePlanes. Asking for updates will get you nowhere.
+2bug
If there is no "cockpit" camera (appears after flyby view) available, using the "previous view" input does not loop continuously. I'm not sure how else to explain it. For example, let's say I have a craft with no custom cameras at all, and the cockpit camera (on the primary cockpit part) set to "disabled". If I press "C", I can continuously cycle through all views forever. However, if I use the keybind "Shift + C" (or any custom ones, like the back side button on my mouse), I get stuck at chase view. If I then enable the cockpit camera or add a custom camera (basically adding a cockpit view camera position), I can cycle backwards continuously.
To sum up the paragraph above,
if there is no default cockpit view, the previous camera input will stop at chase view.bug
If a part outputting to a variable (such as a shock) is destroyed, a bunch of null reference exceptions (
+1NullReferenceException) appear in the debug console. I'm not sure what exactly triggers this as it only happens sometimes. I have a specific plane this happens on (I've seen it on other crafts as well) which I can tag you on if required.