I have both, and I strongly prefer SP. The main points are the designer and VR. I find the SR2 designer difficult to use, and it has no VR. In addition, the connection system is really confusing. I don't understand why you can't just have all connection points the same.
That being said, I have spent some time building and flying rockets. If you like flying rocket related crafts, I'd say go for it, however in my opinion, SP is still the best game for designing, coding, and flying planes.
@Majakalona Jundroo would not be making much money if they only worked on SP, and would eventually run out of money, not even enough money to run SimplePlanes.com. Do you really want that?
@13 @Idksus @PannerTerkins
The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
@ShinyGemsBro It appears to be a publishing bug, which has happened several times before. In fact, other users are reporting it too.
The best solution is to let the devs know and wait.
@windshifter1 From my knowledge of variables and control bases, you might be able to do something with a "floppy" control base (look up control bases in SimpleCheats, I already have a working floppy/rotating combo control base), where you do something with a control base and a spring outputting its compression to the control base. I'm not sure if that makes sense or will work, but it's an idea.
@TinyMaus I think I'm actually going to release a no mods version of each detailed part. That way people with "lower end devices" (literally everyone) can fully appreciate the effort I put in.
@Sense2 I'm not quite sure what you mean, do you mean there is an orange part showing outside the black border at a certain angle, or something else happens inside the black border?
@Sense2 You'll need a lot of variables, such as autopilot and ILS information, which in turn depends on other code, which in turn requires the entire plane...
@asteroidbook345 @V I don't think there is a unit for x, however from my testing I've found that x is 1 when the spring is stretched to twice its normal length, and -1 when fully compressed.
@Randomplayer The final plane will actually be heavily modded so it runs smoothly, but there will be a no mods cargo version with less overall details.
@Randomplayer Well actually because of mods there won't be a true part count, however I estimate the total number of SP parts in the 3D models to be over 20,000, and the final part count will be 2000 parts, most of that being the cockpit.
@TinyMaus
Possibly. I'm thinking of releasing certain aircraft parts separately (and before others), so people with low-end devices can run them.
I have both, and I strongly prefer SP. The main points are the designer and VR. I find the SR2 designer difficult to use, and it has no VR. In addition, the connection system is really confusing. I don't understand why you can't just have all connection points the same.
+5That being said, I have spent some time building and flying rockets. If you like flying rocket related crafts, I'd say go for it, however in my opinion, SP is still the best game for designing, coding, and flying planes.
@Numbers2 Possibly.
@Majakalona Jundroo would not be making much money if they only worked on SP, and would eventually run out of money, not even enough money to run SimplePlanes.com. Do you really want that?
+1The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
@windshifter1 Second question can be answered by setting
partCollisionResponsetodisconnectOnly.@13 @Idksus @PannerTerkins
+2The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
The reason nothing is able to be published is because of a bug with the website. Whenever this happens, the developers fix it within a day.
+3@ShinyGemsBro It appears to be a publishing bug, which has happened several times before. In fact, other users are reporting it too.
The best solution is to let the devs know and wait.
Click on the file.
+1It will open the game and download the plane.
@windshifter1 I meant SimpleCheatsII
@windshifter1 From my knowledge of variables and control bases, you might be able to do something with a "floppy" control base (look up control bases in SimpleCheats, I already have a working floppy/rotating combo control base), where you do something with a control base and a spring outputting its compression to the control base. I'm not sure if that makes sense or will work, but it's an idea.
@Commander9013 No problem!
@Commander9013 I'm on 59.21.48.116.
Also, remember to restart SP before trying a new server. idk why, but you have to do this.
@Commander9013 I'll join MP so you can see if the servers are simply empty.
100% yes. I used to be an iOS player and I could never EVER go back.
+2adjust the scale of the label using overload
+1It's important to use the scale attribute instead of the font size for this label.
@TinyMaus I think I'm actually going to release a no mods version of each detailed part. That way people with "lower end devices" (literally everyone) can fully appreciate the effort I put in.
INSERT Bye INTO Comments;
@BeechcraftA35 err04: comment [inser]exe.c not found error
die (help);
er fail
@BeechcraftA35 SELECT * FROM Words WHERE Word = "yes" OR Word = "Yes";
Return ERROR("Yes" was not found.);
@BeechcraftA35 no
@BeechcraftA35 YesYesYes@BeechcraftA35 @BeechcraftA35
@BeechcraftA35 Yes
@BeechcraftA35 Yes
@BeechcraftA35 Yes
I can help, but in a few days as I'm quite busy IRL
+1@5 Strange
@5 Strange
@5 Strange
@NAFASIRO No, that is not possible in SP, or honestly most quality flight simulators. Flight simulation is about simulating the flight, not a crash.
+1Roll - VTOL
Why was I tagged?
+1@Sense2 My PFD has the exact same problem, I just recessed it into the panel so the excess orange blocks are behind the panel.
@Sense2 I'm not quite sure what you mean, do you mean there is an orange part showing outside the black border at a certain angle, or something else happens inside the black border?
@Sense2 What thing?
@Sense2 Why can't you use the original one?
@Sense2 You'll need a lot of variables, such as autopilot and ILS information, which in turn depends on other code, which in turn requires the entire plane...
This is a step above autotags:
+13auto autotags
There's not many changes aside from different switch and lever models. 1.12.128 is still significant and many users are still staying on it.
+3My SWL-120 has 39 tag comment groups (3 tags per comment) because noting down every request on 2 years of teasers just does that lol
+1@jamesPLANESii Bots are weird lol. Often when I discover a new bot rabbit hole, most of the comments are on old uploads by abandoned accounts.
6
+1and -54
your math is wrong
@EasternCopperhead I used a control base and cylinder grip.
You need a special control base to make it like a pickup object like I did.
@asteroidbook345 @V I don't think there is a unit for x, however from my testing I've found that x is 1 when the spring is stretched to twice its normal length, and -1 when fully compressed.
@BeechcraftA35 SWL-120
@Randomplayer The final plane will actually be heavily modded so it runs smoothly, but there will be a no mods cargo version with less overall details.
@Sense2 I said implode because funny
@Randomplayer Well actually because of mods there won't be a true part count, however I estimate the total number of SP parts in the 3D models to be over 20,000, and the final part count will be 2000 parts, most of that being the cockpit.
@LM0418 Thanks!