@DeejeX Paste the code i put into the ailerons, elevators, and rudder respectively. The 100 and 50 are arbitrary and if you want more stabilization, make the number smaller and vice versa
Smaller control surfaces should help, but it will make your plane less maneuverable. Or you can try giving stabilized control surfaces a try if you don't want to sacrifice maneuverability. (Roll)+(RollRate/100*((-abs(Roll)+1)/1)) (Pitch)-(PitchRate/100*((-abs(Pitch)+1)/1)) (Yaw)-(YawRate/50*((-abs(Yaw)+1)/1))
The rules really need to be updated.
We can't say REDACTED JAPANESE CAR COMPANY like you said, but label art is also discouraged afaik.
Someone else also mentioned adding a dedicated challenge section to the website and I think that's a pretty good idea too.
@BestBuilderEverNOCAP I will admit to being a bit of an F-111 fan. Maybe EF-111
@Ihavesnowball The values for the pitch FT and energy retention FT were slightly changed.
@Ren My powers have doubled since the last time we met, Count.
+1@Dathcha enGineer
Screw the pilot, how's the airframe holding up?
+2@PriyanshuGM if you mean how it bulges out, US cobras are like this. I know international variants have squared off canopies
@Spitfirelad05 Indeed it is!
Yo i saw this irl
+10Meanwhile in the alternate universe where the closed canopy was chosen over the halo
+2@ZeroWithSlashedO i was inspired by yours :v
@ZeroWithSlashedO ¯_(ツ)_/¯
now that im looking at it their tails look almost the same but thats it
@DeveloperKorzalerke from college
+1@ZeroWithSlashedO Initial variants were known as the HueyCobra. I'm guessing it's because they share the same engine, transmission, and rotor system
+1@000007 average fortunate son fan vs chad for what it's worth enjoyer
You should give it schurzen!
+2I̷͇̳̲̋ ̸̧͇͉̜̇̇̑̄C̷͈͊̇̔R̶̫͚͋̔̊̽ͅA̵̮͖͆̑͆͒V̵̛̙̜́͐Ě̶̪ ̵̤̲̅̃H̴̦͉̭͚̔E̶̡͙͂͜A̴̼͋̂T̶̖̯̲̝̃̍̊ ̴̢̈́̍͜S̸̬͙̽̀̓́Į̸̰̰͗̈́͆̀Ḡ̶̺̅͋Ṇ̶̦͇̲̉͝Ą̷̮̈̓̈́T̵͉̏̓̎͝U̵̻̣͐R̷͕̩̞̒E̴̦͋
+6How does one return from brazil and live to tell the tale
@WolfHunter9111 yep!
+1@OkaNieba not atm
@Dragoranos they have the same engine, transimission, and rotor system
@ssenmodnar Of course, you don't need to ask :)
@SirRhyvs comedy 100
+1@ssenmodnar myes?
@SirRhyvs wow that was fast o.o
@CaptainSquadronLeaderX @Ren @BestBuilderEverNOCAP
@OkaNieba @donkski @KangBaksoSoeharto
@BeastHunter @NARGII @SirRhyvs
+1Bottom right
@DeejeX via XML overload, look for inputController in the wings/rotators
@asteroidbook345 50..... 40.... 30.... 20.. 10.
@DeejeX Paste the code i put into the ailerons, elevators, and rudder respectively. The 100 and 50 are arbitrary and if you want more stabilization, make the number smaller and vice versa
@JerryZePilot Everything before the MiG-15bis except the F-15C is outdated
I might update that one but it'd be a pretty major overhaul
Should've had the undo button send you to the backrooms
+2Smaller control surfaces should help, but it will make your plane less maneuverable. Or you can try giving stabilized control surfaces a try if you don't want to sacrifice maneuverability.
+1(Roll)+(RollRate/100*((-abs(Roll)+1)/1))(Pitch)-(PitchRate/100*((-abs(Pitch)+1)/1))(Yaw)-(YawRate/50*((-abs(Yaw)+1)/1))@ColonelCanada @WinsWings oo ee oo aa aa
+1@WolfHunter9111 Without markings they're technically the same :v
+1@MachesterF1 Yeah the thinnest nose possible seems to be the style of the MS series :)
At least it's not Lotus's 2014 nose
Isn't the nose a bit skinny for 2016?
Also, the livery reminds me of the early 2000's McLarens
I think something is wrong with the F-16
pow(Brain,999)
+4cobruh
+2I wish I could spotlight this.
+3Low part builders gang rise up
The rules really need to be updated.
+2We can't say REDACTED JAPANESE CAR COMPANY like you said, but label art is also discouraged afaik.
Someone else also mentioned adding a dedicated challenge section to the website and I think that's a pretty good idea too.
Quick comment, thanks devs for adding the ability update XML! This feature has been extremely useful.
sin(x)/cos(x)
Karma in action
Ceiling
Fuselage cutting may be a headache but it is such a blessing
+3"Abandoned at an air force museum outside of Moscow is a relic of a machine that looks like it came from outer space. Designed 50 years ago by an eccentric visionary, it was to be the most versatile flying machine ever built. An aircraft that can take off vertically, hover in mid air, land on any surface, cruise at high altitudes, and harness the ground effect. But the story of this remarkable machine and its inventor are still shrouded in mystery."
+1Didn't Gura commit war crimes the last time we gave VTubers fighter jets?
Awesome job avoiding paneling on the nose. I'm gonna have to use this technique. :)
+3@BestBuilderEverNOCAP I will admit to being a bit of an F-111 fan. Maybe EF-111
+1@Ihavesnowball The values for the pitch FT and energy retention FT were slightly changed.
@BeastHunter 🍪