Might cost more, but my iPad from 4 years ago can run well over 800 parts and only becomes unplayable at around 1500 parts; which cording to your numbers is outperforming your PC. @BaconEggs
Yes, fairly obviously clicking the mouse button isn’t hard; but I just hate using mouse to joystick. The debs really should have added a control method like war thunder. That would be so much easier for turrets and planes @F104Deathtrap
On PC I find it unusable with Pitch and yaw (unless I’m using mouse controller) but on iOS I find it easier to use it. I suppose they make it accessible to the masses. It’s a choice of easy on mobile and unusable on PC or useable on PC and useable on mobile. @F104Deathtrap
It would have prevented a lot of people deleting their account in a hissy fit only to regret it half an hour later and then make an alt... like almost every big account that’s been deleted.
The B-24 looks phenomenal considering the quality of the interior as well! And only 540 parts? As your last creation was great but had a few issues with flying, I would be glad to go on your B-24 and make it fly completely stable and realistically if you need.
No, it is different. Physics are a little different (turn radius and stuff like that is mildly different on PC than on mobile) and the graphics are slightly downgraded; even when on full settings. This slightly annoys me as I’m sure my iPad would be able to run the full PC settings even if there was a 30% hit to frame Rate (I think it’s worth it as I can run it usually around 60-80FPS). If your mobile device can’t, then you could just revert back to lower settings. @LiamW
A mid-range device now is around the same as a high end device 4 years ago or even earlier. I found the 7-10FPS good enough to report and give feedback to Johndfg, though you are right; it’s oretty much unplayable. However, it’s not about being unplayable; it’s about being able to be playable up to around 1200 parts low physics (800 parts high physics) and even 2500 parts all low settings without crashing like your PC. @LiamW
A high end device from anywhere in the last 4 years is a reasonable assumption for the average mobile device. I can run 800 parts on high physics and highest graphics, but when I get to the limit (1000 parts - 1200 parts) I have to turn it to low graphics, but leave everything else up. I can get up to 2,500 part planes on all lowest settings at about 10FPS. @LiamW
That’s not true at all. There’s a difference between mobile friendly and terrible computer friendly. A decent mobile devices from 4 years ago to the present will run the original just fine. A mobile device from that period that is decent will run up to about 1300 parts being ok. @LiamW
This is mobile friendly, as long as you have a decent device from 4 years ago - present. People make it seem like mobile devices are terrible just because a lot of people own very low performance devices. My iPad Air 2 from 2014 runs the non-mobile friendly version at high settings just fine with over 30FPS.
The feature is supposed to feature builds that aren’t getting the amount of attention they deserve. So BogdanX, for example, gets over 100 upvotes on most of his builds, and even though they might be better than other craft; he never gets featured because he already gets so much attention @RodWan
Nice, but XML modding anything on the build still works with the base game. It’s only if you download mods and add them onto the build like weapons or engines that require mods outside of the base game.
Beautiful, but please scale down trucks like this to 1:1 once you’ve finished them. This looks incredible and it would be even better if I could drive it around at life-size
Don’t say ‘upvote to be taaged’ because that means that everyone who upvotes will be tagged, even if they don’t want to. Just say ‘tell me if you want to be tagged’.
Will these aircraft ever be rated or has this project been abandoned? @Gestour
Might cost more, but my iPad from 4 years ago can run well over 800 parts and only becomes unplayable at around 1500 parts; which cording to your numbers is outperforming your PC. @BaconEggs
Can’t or won’t?
I’m building a cargo plane. It’s currently on 1650 parts, but I am building it on mobile; so technically it’s mobile-friendly.
+3Tag me
Do turboprops count as it’s technically a jet?
Well you have to invert controls for good mouse aiming turret, which makes it weird if you try to use it normally. @F104Deathtrap
When I used a PC I didn’t use mouse aiming all the time. I think the keys are the standard configuration that SP comes with. @F104Deathtrap
Of course flying with a joystick is fun, but when it comes to turret aiming we need something like the system in war thunder. @F104Deathtrap
Yes, fairly obviously clicking the mouse button isn’t hard; but I just hate using mouse to joystick. The debs really should have added a control method like war thunder. That would be so much easier for turrets and planes @F104Deathtrap
I’m confused, you seem to have blocked me in the past few days and I don’t understand why @BogdanX
On PC I find it unusable with Pitch and yaw (unless I’m using mouse controller) but on iOS I find it easier to use it. I suppose they make it accessible to the masses. It’s a choice of easy on mobile and unusable on PC or useable on PC and useable on mobile. @F104Deathtrap
Sorry for giving you a broken version, this is the proper one with no issues
It would have prevented a lot of people deleting their account in a hissy fit only to regret it half an hour later and then make an alt... like almost every big account that’s been deleted.
+4Please add the transport tag for things like the Junkers Ju-52 and the Hughes H-4 Hercules. Also, a 4x4 and 6x6 tag would be nice.
Also make sure CoM and CoL are in their right places, along with the right wing surface to aircraft size ratio.
Sure. Just tag me on it. @FalconGT12
I’ve been trying to find that out for literally about a year and a half @TheStig918
+1You said the first one is 1300 parts and the second is 540. In this forum the P-51 is displayed first and the B-24 is 2nd. @BoganBoganTheMan
Another way is to multiple rocket pods inside each other by nudging them together. @WNP78 @FalconGT12
The B-24 looks phenomenal considering the quality of the interior as well! And only 540 parts? As your last creation was great but had a few issues with flying, I would be glad to go on your B-24 and make it fly completely stable and realistically if you need.
You should make a plane out of these!
+1No, it is different. Physics are a little different (turn radius and stuff like that is mildly different on PC than on mobile) and the graphics are slightly downgraded; even when on full settings. This slightly annoys me as I’m sure my iPad would be able to run the full PC settings even if there was a 30% hit to frame Rate (I think it’s worth it as I can run it usually around 60-80FPS). If your mobile device can’t, then you could just revert back to lower settings. @LiamW
A mid-range device now is around the same as a high end device 4 years ago or even earlier. I found the 7-10FPS good enough to report and give feedback to Johndfg, though you are right; it’s oretty much unplayable. However, it’s not about being unplayable; it’s about being able to be playable up to around 1200 parts low physics (800 parts high physics) and even 2500 parts all low settings without crashing like your PC. @LiamW
Alright, I tested Johnsfg’s B24 before it was released and I could run that at the lowest settings at around 7-10FPS. here it is. @LiamW
Mobile is definitely not going to have options for the same graphics as PC. SP doesn’t so I don’t see why SR2 would. @LiamW
A high end device from anywhere in the last 4 years is a reasonable assumption for the average mobile device. I can run 800 parts on high physics and highest graphics, but when I get to the limit (1000 parts - 1200 parts) I have to turn it to low graphics, but leave everything else up. I can get up to 2,500 part planes on all lowest settings at about 10FPS. @LiamW
Yes, that’s what I said. @LiamW
You need to update your apps!
+5That’s not true at all. There’s a difference between mobile friendly and terrible computer friendly. A decent mobile devices from 4 years ago to the present will run the original just fine. A mobile device from that period that is decent will run up to about 1300 parts being ok. @LiamW
This is mobile friendly, as long as you have a decent device from 4 years ago - present. People make it seem like mobile devices are terrible just because a lot of people own very low performance devices. My iPad Air 2 from 2014 runs the non-mobile friendly version at high settings just fine with over 30FPS.
I think that SR2 Mobile is going to have all the functionality that the PC version has, just with downgraded graphics.
It won’t @Hyattorama
+1I hate how the devs haven’t added slo-mo to iOS.
The feature is supposed to feature builds that aren’t getting the amount of attention they deserve. So BogdanX, for example, gets over 100 upvotes on most of his builds, and even though they might be better than other craft; he never gets featured because he already gets so much attention @RodWan
Nice, but XML modding anything on the build still works with the base game. It’s only if you download mods and add them onto the build like weapons or engines that require mods outside of the base game.
Just came back to this. I’m sorry that it didn’t do very well in terms of upvotes, this really is great. It’s just underrated.
Incredible!
Beautiful, but please scale down trucks like this to 1:1 once you’ve finished them. This looks incredible and it would be even better if I could drive it around at life-size
This one is very good
+1If it’s too small just scale it up, it’ll be a relatively easy fix
+2Do you have any plans to add slo-mo to iOS? @AndrewGarrison
You can’t get mods on iOS, you can on android. @Boatrider
You can’t download them anyway
I don’t think so
You’re not alone@Awsomur
Great! @BoeyingOfficial
I like your building style
Don’t say ‘upvote to be taaged’ because that means that everyone who upvotes will be tagged, even if they don’t want to. Just say ‘tell me if you want to be tagged’.
Oh, I see @TheGuyYouMightKnow