@PikeovlevPlanes Minor rule revision- Some XMLed engines are fine, e.g prop blades, thickness, pitch, and thruster rotation, and making engines less powerful, but no adding extra power to engines. This does not include helis or tiltrotors, that need more power.
@ShatterFox @SimpleTechAndResearch @Shawniepie @Luke92778 @Supercraft888 @Thefalloutplayr @Tully2001 @Seabo14 @WNP78 @Matt7709 @ValtsuAircraftIndustries ATTENTION ALL NATO PLAYERS- Please post all new planes on this page. This will help me to implement a scoring system. This page can also act as a NATO discussion page, so you can speak with fellow team members about creations. Thanks, and keep building!
Nice plane, due to it's propeller placement, it can take off even when flipped. I'm not sure where you got 600+ from, the only way I could get that was by changing the prop to warbird, X3 thickness. I'm about to upload a few float designs!
@PikeovlevPlanes Great transport, but maybe give the wings a higher aspect ratio, so it can glide down better, and give it a wider track for better all-terrain/short field performance.
@PikeovlevPlanes Good system, but even on the ground it moves a bit to quickly to accurately target planes. I recommend changing rotator speed to 20. Also, it is a bit bulky to fit onto planes, maybe make an airborne version with separate targeting system? Nice loadout though!
Damn! I made a glider that looked almost exactly like this! I'll post it soon. The reason I didn't post it was because I was trying to add a lift motor.
@Tully2001 I like your Meteor BTW
@Tully2001 Wow, that was definitely worth the wait!
@Luke92778 Good!
@SimpleTechAndResearch Great!
@SimpleTechAndResearch Good idea, I will.
@PikeovlevPlanes Aaahh, you're everywhere!
@PikeovlevPlanes Ok, tiltjets are fine, I have linked in the NATO page, and I will link on the WW3 challenge.
@SimpleTechAndResearch Nice, I might start a bomber challenge.
@PikeovlevPlanes Good, almost done, desert digital camo, and remote controlled bomb.
@SimpleTechAndResearch Lol that is a good idea.
@SimpleTechAndResearch Lol
Good variant! My heavy fighter is almost done, even the prop version goes almost supersonic in cruise!
@WaterAirLand Are you going to join? Maybe join North Korea, it's a bit outnumbered.
@FatNinja Great!
@Luke92778 No, this is
@PINK Sorry, no entries yet.
@PikeovlevPlanes Challenge page and NATO page. Please link on this page.
Challenge Page
@PikeovlevPlanes Minor rule revision- Some XMLed engines are fine, e.g prop blades, thickness, pitch, and thruster rotation, and making engines less powerful, but no adding extra power to engines. This does not include helis or tiltrotors, that need more power.
@ShatterFox @SimpleTechAndResearch @Shawniepie @Luke92778 @Supercraft888 @Thefalloutplayr @Tully2001 @Seabo14 @WNP78 @Matt7709 @ValtsuAircraftIndustries ATTENTION ALL NATO PLAYERS- Please post all new planes on this page. This will help me to implement a scoring system. This page can also act as a NATO discussion page, so you can speak with fellow team members about creations. Thanks, and keep building!
Nice plane, due to it's propeller placement, it can take off even when flipped. I'm not sure where you got 600+ from, the only way I could get that was by changing the prop to warbird, X3 thickness. I'm about to upload a few float designs!
Can we modify the shape? e.g lengthen it to accommodate a bomb bay?
@PikeovlevPlanes I forgot to add them, this is almost a ground attack aircraft. I'll add more in a later variant. Challenge entry coming soon!
@PikeovlevPlanes Meh, most of my planes are for long runways, so it isn't that important.
@PikeovlevPlanes Ok, so is this one more non-combat transport rather that assault troop transport? Good plane.
@isod89 Just a minor glitch, when you point a landing light at the ocean, the whole ocean lights up. Great mod BTW
@PikeovlevPlanes Great transport, but maybe give the wings a higher aspect ratio, so it can glide down better, and give it a wider track for better all-terrain/short field performance.
@PikeovlevPlanes Why so many comments?
Wow! This is..... interesting. It would be better if there was some pitch control.
@ValtsuAircraftIndustries Nice! Those will be useful alongside @Delphirier's Incher Interceptors for repelling the invasion.
This will be useful alongside Kestrels and Ospreys in the war against North Korea!
@WNP78 It's just my cockpit flew upwards at 17000 mph when I crashed
@WNP78 Oh ok
Is this using weightless cockpits?
How does it work?
@Luke92778 Nice!
@Luke92778 Korean Challenge
@PikeovlevPlanes Good system, but even on the ground it moves a bit to quickly to accurately target planes. I recommend changing rotator speed to 20. Also, it is a bit bulky to fit onto planes, maybe make an airborne version with separate targeting system? Nice loadout though!
@PikeovlevPlanes Improved Eagle Lots better!
Damn! I made a glider that looked almost exactly like this! I'll post it soon. The reason I didn't post it was because I was trying to add a lift motor.
Why no description?
@PikeovlevPlanes Ok i'll check it out
@PikeovlevPlanes How is the mossie going?
@PikeovlevPlanes How's the mosquito coming on? It turns out only 17 Tsetse's were built.
Damn! I was going to use airbrake doors on my transport plane!
@PikeovlevPlanes Great spelling on the title BTW
@PikeovlevPlanes Lol! I jettisoned some bombs, not realising you had used long landing gear.
@PikeovlevPlanes The long T/O was a safety feature to defend against Russian capture on their short runways!
@Seabo14 when this exploded on takeoff, my canopy reached mach 2!
A decent bomber matched only in good looks by these
