198k SledDriver Comments

  • F-105 Thud 6.6 years ago

    Thanks, @CRJ900Pilot

  • F-105 Thud 6.6 years ago

    @AdlerSteiner Thanks.

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @SaturnV Thanks. Yeah, I remember your username. Welcome back.

    +1
  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @Countache27 Yeah, I wonder how many people thought this is a fictional aircraft.

  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @Countache27 Yakovlev Yak-28

    +1
  • Bobcat 6.6 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick Shortened or beefed-up, depending upon how you look at it.

    +1
  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @FGW2014 It means it's fine whichever of my builds you like best :)

  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @EternalDarkness Yeah, I know. Probably a bug in the game engine. I can't be bothered to figure it out.

  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @Phil2003 Well, as I said, I don't build exact replicas (because I like to think I have a higher purpose than being a copy machine), and speed is a part of that. I chose the two speeds (~1000 mph and ~3700 mph) for my flight module because I find them the best to get around in the SP sandbox. Occasionally I adjust them to suit the plane, but mostly I prefer to keep my flight model consistent across all my builds.

    I don't see SP as a place to recreate all the limitations of real life, but something like the Matrix where we can surpass the limitations of real life.

    You got the bit about details right, because I can think of few things more boring than constantly comparing blueprints/photos to my build, trying to match every single detail down to rivets. Again, I'm not a copy machine. I like to capture the essence of an aircraft.

    As for landing gear, I don't find them worth the time and effort they take. Control surfaces using rotators often kill performance for no discernible reason, and I can't be bothered to figure out why. I have a choice: I could spend my time building lots of great designs, or I could build a lot fewer airplanes and waste time building essentially the same thing (landing gear) over and over again. To me, that's an easy choice.

    +1
  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @EternalDarkness Before you ask, I did add control surfaces, but they kill performance on this build for some reason. Every few seconds the game just freezes.

  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @Phil2003 Yeah, those are quite interesting shapes. I'll put them on my list. But note that my builds are never exact replicas, only loosely based on the real thing.

  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @FGW2014 OK, well, as long as you like something :)

  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    Thanks, @CRJ900Pilot

  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    Danke, @Phil2003. Well, I don't find airliners very interesting, but if I run out of other ideas I might make one.

  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @grizzlitn Thanks :)

  • Tupolev 444 Prototype 6.6 years ago

    Interesting design. Instead of binding the landing gear to activation groups and VTOL, you can simply use LandingGear as the input to make the controls less complicated.

  • Yakovlev Yak-28 SD 6.6 years ago

    @FGW2014 Oh, why's that?

  • Hornet Defense Industries UE-11TT 6.6 years ago

    Drives well, you've obviously got that part figured out.

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @Countache27 yes, isn't it

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @LuciferOfPoland :)

  • Goblin 6.6 years ago

    @Delosofy Thanks, but I don't use Twitch (or any other social media).

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    Thanks, @Phil2003

  • EC-18 AWE&C 6.6 years ago

    Very nice.

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    Thank you, @Nef680

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    Thanks, @ThomasRoderick

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot Oh, and by the way, when your ears ring, that means some of your auditory nerves have just died. It may be fun, but you're causing irreversible hearing loss to yourself.

    +1
  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    Thanks, @FGW2014

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @grizzlitn mairsee boo-coo, mon ami

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot Hate is far too weak a word for people like that.

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot I used to have no problem with noise, but then I had the misfortune of living among the kind of village idiots who think it's the coolest thing ever to drive around at low gear and high RPM at all hours. Now, unfortunately, revving engines are forever associated with douchemonkeys for me. I used to love high-performance cars and bikes, but now they're absolutely ruined for me.

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot Prop planes are slow, nose props obstruct the view, and most of all, they're noisy (I know jets are loud too, but in SP you can make them quiet). I really, really hate noise, because of some extremely scummy people. (Long story.)

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @Spectre2520 See the instructions: AG2: High agility mode. I use a keyboard to fly, so any input is either full-on or full-off, there's no in-between. That's why I keep the default pitch very gentle, and include a stronger pitch control for fast turns and mobile devices.

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot Sure, I like the P-51, even though it's a prop plane (ugh). How about a jet-powered P-51?

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot and the plasma cannons, I guess...

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    @EternalDarkness Hardly :) A fairly simple build.

  • F-104 Starfighter SD 6.6 years ago

    Thanks, @CRJ900Pilot. This one doesn't have much spin, though, it's pretty close to the real thing... unless you mean the smooth finish?

  • Goblin 6.6 years ago

    @tsampoy Yes, isn't she...

  • Goblin 6.6 years ago

    @RailfanEthan I knew I would regret looking that up...

  • Goblin 6.6 years ago

    @Spectre2520 Well, I do have some low part count builds, in that case. 1 2 3 4 5

  • Goblin 6.6 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot Looks fine to me.

  • Goblin 6.6 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot Are you still working on it, or is it finished and you're waiting to upload at a scheduled time? Look forward to seeing the finished build, it looked pretty good when I last saw it.

  • Goblin 6.6 years ago

    Thanks, @CRJ900Pilot.

  • Goblin 6.6 years ago

    @Spectre2520 If you detach the wingtip fuel tanks, it goes down to 463 parts. Yeah, I've been busy this past week, but am back to my regular upload schedule starting today.

  • Avro Arrow-SD 6.6 years ago

    @TR87 3, maybe 4 hours at most.

  • Avro Arrow-SD 6.6 years ago

    @TR87 Something simple like this, about an hour.

  • MiG-21 SD 6.6 years ago

    Thanks, @AV8R

  • MiG-21 SD 6.6 years ago

    @CenturiVonKikie I did build a variable geometry something, though that's probably not what you're looking for. I might build a VG fighter at some point.

    +1
  • MiG-21 SD 6.6 years ago

    @Jacobdaniel Hi

  • MiG-21 SD 6.6 years ago

    Thanks, @Phil2003

  • MiG-21 SD 6.6 years ago

    @Latios22 Hmm, maybe. If a design like that comes to me I'll build it.