From other comments to your post, well, I deem there must be evil masters somewhere that can change entire worlds via voice command (ever seen the movie "Matrix") so, it's a humorous line of quasi-engineering inquiry if "people" exist in digital worlds. @Gravity
@Gravity you’ve shared a few Olde parts with the community, thanks. Time for me to re-package Olde parts I’ve shared before, but, frankly are on no ones radar since they are Olde. Don’t newbie builders realize that Olde parts can be added wherever needed in current designs?
As per accelaration, OK, it's up to you to test and observe. Other stock propeller builds of mine are faster than this one, using 2 or 3 propellers only. These 5 stock (nudged but stock) props succeeded in reaching the attack speed of 500 mph quickly so the weapons wpould work. The design is far from perfect: I would recommend you remove the rear 2 propellers if you ever try a variation of the design. Feel free to re-use the body and modify it. Good luck. @Spectre2520
Hope you find the post with your cockpit within 6 hours. Stock molded body with 5 Propellers. Normal handling. No big deal. Yet, the weapons will take out Snowstone Missile batteries and Jundroo fleets-- which is outside of the scope of your original competition. Still, pure propeller with std takeoff and landing. If you find this post "Propeller Challenge" I hope you can use it, whether it scores points or not. The post is temporary. @Spectre2520
You have the general concept of my last comment. Those weird poles can be used if you ever place floating engines on them; they must be detached from the Sub Body and yes Windows and iOS allow that. The result is a diving thing that just goes up and down. I’m using a notmal iOS device as I respond - which creates fun surface Submarine models. @Stellarlabs
A WIP that has promise. Functional: lose the external structures. Weapons: Stock Jundroo torpedoes are ineffective - use something else. Control: add controls. There exist only a few Jundroo posts which have funtional Submarine-build control systems.
You are not going to get much feedback from either military or civilian warcraft pilots in this column. An interesting list, BTW. Without a check ride who's to know when pilot skills are bragged about?
My iPad is charging, with unfinished WIP builds. No mods of any kind on the builds I submit to you. You may save or delete anything I send you which uses your cockpit. Will be a few hours; I rarely do new propelller builds. @Spectre2520
No need to respond, just a comment: with far less than 10 parts, no landing gear, it’s easy to build a flyable aircraft model. In the future maybe you could define what “landing” means since some entrants to this challenge offer landing=crash. Something for you to chew on, in your future postings.
Not intended as a replica, this initial build has the most effective hollywood style weapons. Which outperform Jundroo ground/sea defenses. If you dislike weapons, OK. @junglekiIIer
Nice concept build. Request: could you mount the revolving radome under the fusalege and create an EP-3? No response is requested, just something for you to chew on.
@WarHawk95 Thank you. And yes, the weapons are Hollywood stunt jokes. Except few other Jundroo builders (no names) post missiles that are fully tested and which strike at twice the speed of Jundroo defense missiles.
@ShiptyTheLucario Yes that is a design baseline. This is a radically weapons mod update. Request you test weapons in-flight, and I expect more feedback.
Holy cow, you noticed the augmented non-stock handling, which you may use in your own future builds. What the upvoters AdlerSteiner, SledDriver, and BaconRoll noticed is different. The missiles (super Cleavers) are unique- requiring no lengthy lock-on - and fly at 1500 mph to a laser-like strike target impact. This is FYI. I wish you success in your future builds. @AchuTMM
@AchuTMM What? If you say so. It's not a jet fighter...from WW2 propeller performance, go figure... I'll post you a simple 100% stock build of a modern US Coast Guard patrol plane, with your cockpit to add something to your challenge.
From other comments to your post, well, I deem there must be evil masters somewhere that can change entire worlds via voice command (ever seen the movie "Matrix") so, it's a humorous line of quasi-engineering inquiry if "people" exist in digital worlds. @Gravity
Ask AndrewGarrison re: people dwelling in within a digital game. (I’m merely a rocket scientist not a game programmer) @MajesticAerospace
@Gravity you’ve shared a few Olde parts with the community, thanks. Time for me to re-package Olde parts I’ve shared before, but, frankly are on no ones radar since they are Olde. Don’t newbie builders realize that Olde parts can be added wherever needed in current designs?
Beautiful build, great handling!
Comment: looks worth testing and evaluating. Will not do so when Required Mods prevent standard web downloads. My humble, free opinion.
Thanks, and yes I was frankly amazed this 5 prop build flew normal Jundroo missions.
So, when it worked I just had to share it. @Carbonfox1
Thank you @Texasfam04
Thank you @SledDriver
Thank you @jettStorm
As per accelaration, OK, it's up to you to test and observe. Other stock propeller builds of mine are faster than this one, using 2 or 3 propellers only. These 5 stock (nudged but stock) props succeeded in reaching the attack speed of 500 mph quickly so the weapons wpould work. The design is far from perfect: I would recommend you remove the rear 2 propellers if you ever try a variation of the design. Feel free to re-use the body and modify it. Good luck. @Spectre2520
for testing. @Spectre2520
Thank you or testing! @Spectre2520
Hope you find the post with your cockpit within 6 hours. Stock molded body with 5 Propellers. Normal handling. No big deal. Yet, the weapons will take out Snowstone Missile batteries and Jundroo fleets-- which is outside of the scope of your original competition. Still, pure propeller with std takeoff and landing. If you find this post "Propeller Challenge" I hope you can use it, whether it scores points or not. The post is temporary. @Spectre2520
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Du3Kdu/Propeller-Challenge
@Spectre2520
@Spectre2520 It has your cockpit. Otherwise, check under newest postings, called Propeller Challenge.
OK I’ll send you one of my test protypes. Just to share an armed quad-prop with the community. @Spectre2520
Function: Missiles are highly effective at speeds below 1500 mph. Ag=3 swing wing works great. Tested via old iPad. Kudos!
Glad you liked it! Try cockpit view. @BurkeEnterprise
Thanks @Feanor
Thanks @yoshicraze
Thanks @SledDriver
Thanks @Xjayindustries
Almost forgot, 2 years ago, if Scottie wants warp speed, just select ACT=-2 on
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/hE9s2U/Cadet-USS-TV34-Trainer
@gavin1234
Beast posted here is about 2 1/2 yars old, constructed using SP V1.0 block structures. Thx for testing - it can use any runway on Jundroo. @gavin1234
You have the general concept of my last comment. Those weird poles can be used if you ever place floating engines on them; they must be detached from the Sub Body and yes Windows and iOS allow that. The result is a diving thing that just goes up and down. I’m using a notmal iOS device as I respond - which creates fun surface Submarine models. @Stellarlabs
Uhh....the "realistic" clause is in the eye of the beholder. (Nice paint job on the body flags, or similar). Clarify.
A WIP that has promise. Functional: lose the external structures. Weapons: Stock Jundroo torpedoes are ineffective - use something else. Control: add controls. There exist only a few Jundroo posts which have funtional Submarine-build control systems.
+1You are not going to get much feedback from either military or civilian warcraft pilots in this column. An interesting list, BTW. Without a check ride who's to know when pilot skills are bragged about?
Wish I could download and test it on a fast tablet. Looks cool!
My iPad is charging, with unfinished WIP builds. No mods of any kind on the builds I submit to you. You may save or delete anything I send you which uses your cockpit. Will be a few hours; I rarely do new propelller builds. @Spectre2520
No need to respond, just a comment: with far less than 10 parts, no landing gear, it’s easy to build a flyable aircraft model. In the future maybe you could define what “landing” means since some entrants to this challenge offer landing=crash. Something for you to chew on, in your future postings.
Thank you @SledDriver
Not intended as a replica, this initial build has the most effective hollywood style weapons. Which outperform Jundroo ground/sea defenses. If you dislike weapons, OK. @junglekiIIer
Nice concept build. Request: could you mount the revolving radome under the fusalege and create an EP-3? No response is requested, just something for you to chew on.
+2Thanks @grizzlitn When you test this, a single missile launch will cause a temporary flight path recoil.
Thank you @Chinaxiaowu
@WarHawk95 Thank you. And yes, the weapons are Hollywood stunt jokes. Except few other Jundroo builders (no names) post missiles that are fully tested and which strike at twice the speed of Jundroo defense missiles.
@Spectre2520 Thanks for clarifying, for all.
@ShiptyTheLucario Yes that is a design baseline. This is a radically weapons mod update. Request you test weapons in-flight, and I expect more feedback.
By realistic speed fo you mean Cessna (130 mph max) or any stable speed, forget the mph limit?
Thank you@XJayIndustrys
+1Thank you @ACMECo1940
Peace.
Fare the well in the future, Latent, this is a vert good build. (Now you speak Windows, congrats.)
Thank you - best of success. @AchuTMM
Holy cow, you noticed the augmented non-stock handling, which you may use in your own future builds. What the upvoters AdlerSteiner, SledDriver, and BaconRoll noticed is different. The missiles (super Cleavers) are unique- requiring no lengthy lock-on - and fly at 1500 mph to a laser-like strike target impact. This is FYI. I wish you success in your future builds. @AchuTMM
I just provided a 9-part entry to your contest. Without gear, it would be only 4 parts, but that's an older challenge.... enjoy testing!
Thanks, this is WW2 with weapons on steroids I guess. @BaconRoll
+1Q: Do you prefer a decent jet or prop build with only 10 parts?
@AchuTMM What? If you say so. It's not a jet fighter...from WW2 propeller performance, go figure... I'll post you a simple 100% stock build of a modern US Coast Guard patrol plane, with your cockpit to add something to your challenge.