You have accurately lined up where your cannon Hits Jundroo Game targets with the custom tiny reticle dot. Of course, this is not your first. Still, I like this method SimplePlanes weapons engagement.
IK. Not a die-hard "Gamer" myself. My actual TX family ranch was established during horses and carriage days. I safely presume horse carriages wwere before my time or yours! Heritage, for me, working on the ranch when I was very young. @Texasfam04
Gotcha, agree! The latest SP release allows so much “Unity” PC linked modding to paint colors, lettering, and insignia that the average SP “new” user upvotes based upon the Thumbnail posted appearance, as another silver user worded it as I compared his builds to mine. @AfterShock
Thanks for noticing; I do not have a large following these days. Fyi, I chose not to create modded parts or entire modded builds, for the moment. I just post builds I’ve made and tested that potentially others in the cummunity may test and build upon. @AfterShock
No need to fix. A Lockheed aircraft engineer would simply give the test pilots parachutes, apply bubble-gum in the mid-sections, and wish the pilots “good luck” on takeoff. Boeing vs Lockheed competition is ruthless.
Re-tested. FYI, basic Drag Tool in the builder will show you high drag on the left, low drag on the right. On my Mac running SimplePlanes.app dated May 14, 2018, the top takeoff speed achievable is 29 mph. This seems to be a platform issue which affects many others, so feel free to send a bug report to Jundroo (somehow).
I can launch this build in-air. On runways, there's a HARD yaw to the right -- it won't stay on the runway, and crashes. Tested via Mac desktop. @ForeverPie
@SledDriver Okay. The 5K resolution of the typical Macintosh is a reference point for me. Highest resolution display is a given. The tower base, frankly, is not a new idea -- but yes, it is easier to add RAM and accelerated video cards when needed.
Partitioning the root will be fun to accomplish. On a PC, my experience would force me do disable"auto-install". I'm somewhat embarrased to admit that I have 2 separate external drives running backup 24/7 on a simple Macintosh desktop. I tend to be cautious, I suppose.
Okay, a more complete gadget disclosure: I was issued a company-furnished new PC model for the last 18 years. With the OS completely gutted (no YouTube, no Google) it was simply a work station box. I once ran sys admin services on the company’s Unix servers, and disabled any services that my former company directed me to do. Result: PC platforms that are “free range” open systems will be a new challenge, basically requiring minor firewall upgrades. For me, the preferred PC will be a laptop which also is a high-end gaming platform (a contradiction in term to some folks). Appreciate your inputs. @SledDriver
Forget auto-roll comment. User error. Did not have gear fully retracted (AG4) when attacking Snowstone misile dual batteries at sub-1000 mph speed. This equals sluggish pitch response. AG2 not activated. Landing is possible, but, tricky at 300 mph without using AG2. In the future, I will use AG2 at lower speeds, and provide you feedback. Tested on iPhone XR, iPad Pro and iMac desktop. Not tested on Google Pixel, which frankly has less satisfactory mobile GUI response times. @SledDriver
@SledDriver I activate AG1 during my normal test process on your particular builds. Then, deactivate AG1 upon approching targets or landing sites. AG2 has been tested independently of AG1. AG2 on your builds simply causes wild results at low speeds on my mobiles devices: Google Pixel tablet, iPad Pro tablet, iPhone XR. Keyboards of PC and Mac desktops react differently to SP and SR2. I have noticed a minor autoroll clockwise on this build.
@SledDriver Correct, prefer pitch to be stronger independent of AG2. Activating AG2 works sorta OK on my desktop, yet, when activated wreaks havoc (e.g. uncontrollable performance) on my mobile devices. Dunno why this happens, I'm merely a tester.
No lag, on simple platforms. At low speeds this model could use more pitch IMHO. My 5 Teraflop iPhone XR test was the first device used in testing. Desktop and iPad Pro yield same performance results. From the Apple perspective, I hope my inputs help you. @SledDriver
Good build. More Pitch control is preferred when eliminating Snowstone Missile battery. Likewise, more pitch at low speeds, for direct elimnation of Jundroo's Wright island naval missiles. OK, I test multiple launch points and all targets. Tested via both desktop and iPhone XR. Comments are positive feedback. I like the build!
FYI, this CH-47 build flys better on my iPhone than on my desktop.
However, Jundroo LLC will receive a bug report re the silly “This Download Is Too Large for Your Platform” annoying banners.
@AchuTMM Built useing sticks and stones and SP V1.0 on a tablet. Moderators advised me too keep older posts available. I guess so folks can argue over old junk that I really want to scrap.
@DragonFire007 Sorta. But I built aircraft models that were of similar construction to that olde time period. I'm terrible at attempting full replicas. Anyhow, I'm taking a break from SP builds for a short while.
Credit where credit is due! This qualifies a replica IMHO, based upon flight characteristics. The extra work you put into your side-loaded shape is extraordinary. Tested on OSX.
From other comments to your post, well, I deem there must be evil masters somewhere that can change entire worlds via voice command (ever seen the movie "Matrix") so, it's a humorous line of quasi-engineering inquiry if "people" exist in digital worlds. @Gravity
@Gravity you’ve shared a few Olde parts with the community, thanks. Time for me to re-package Olde parts I’ve shared before, but, frankly are on no ones radar since they are Olde. Don’t newbie builders realize that Olde parts can be added wherever needed in current designs?
You have accurately lined up where your cannon Hits Jundroo Game targets with the custom tiny reticle dot. Of course, this is not your first. Still, I like this method SimplePlanes weapons engagement.
IK. Not a die-hard "Gamer" myself. My actual TX family ranch was established during horses and carriage days. I safely presume horse carriages wwere before my time or yours! Heritage, for me, working on the ranch when I was very young. @Texasfam04
@Texasfam04 Negative, I use both.
@Texasfam04 Crosstalk: I have ranch land (rented) in Texas. Your handle TEX is great, by me.
Thank you @Texasfam04
Np @AfterShock
Got it to operate in-air. Very good main fore fuselage for builds performed over 1 year ago.
Runs fine on Google Pixel tablets, iPad Pro, iPhone X, Mac desktops, PC desktops. Fyi. @AfterShock
Gotcha, agree! The latest SP release allows so much “Unity” PC linked modding to paint colors, lettering, and insignia that the average SP “new” user upvotes based upon the Thumbnail posted appearance, as another silver user worded it as I compared his builds to mine. @AfterShock
Thanks for noticing; I do not have a large following these days. Fyi, I chose not to create modded parts or entire modded builds, for the moment. I just post builds I’ve made and tested that potentially others in the cummunity may test and build upon. @AfterShock
Very nice exhaust pattern!
Note: Engine Expansion Pack is not supported on my platforms. Cannot test; fyi.
Chaff/flare dispensers are not needed. Otherwise, good build!
No need to fix. A Lockheed aircraft engineer would simply give the test pilots parachutes, apply bubble-gum in the mid-sections, and wish the pilots “good luck” on takeoff. Boeing vs Lockheed competition is ruthless.
Follow-up comment, no I do not have the brakes or reverse thrust on. During initial testing, the only active Group is AG = 8.
Re-tested. FYI, basic Drag Tool in the builder will show you high drag on the left, low drag on the right. On my Mac running SimplePlanes.app dated May 14, 2018, the top takeoff speed achievable is 29 mph. This seems to be a platform issue which affects many others, so feel free to send a bug report to Jundroo (somehow).
No, I do not touch gear until successful takeoff. (Old habits die hard.) The fueselage drag is assymetric, for some reason. Will re-test. @ForeverPie
I can launch this build in-air. On runways, there's a HARD yaw to the right -- it won't stay on the runway, and crashes. Tested via Mac desktop. @ForeverPie
Thanks! @SledDriver
Thanks @EternalDarkness
Looks cool! Some of us are not on Steam. Nor intend to be. Cannot test, but an awesome concept here.
Thanks @SodiumChloride
Yaw CNTL? Suggest add nose gear steering and low-altitude yaw CNTL authority. Just an uneducated idea. Tested via desktop.
Nice and very fast prop boom-tail iOS build! Do more of them.
Probably a good product. Looks pretty. I choose not to use Steam for SR2. Anxiously awaiting the mobile GUI release of SR2. Best of success!
@SledDriver Okay. The 5K resolution of the typical Macintosh is a reference point for me. Highest resolution display is a given. The tower base, frankly, is not a new idea -- but yes, it is easier to add RAM and accelerated video cards when needed.
Partitioning the root will be fun to accomplish. On a PC, my experience would force me do disable"auto-install". I'm somewhat embarrased to admit that I have 2 separate external drives running backup 24/7 on a simple Macintosh desktop. I tend to be cautious, I suppose.
Okay, a more complete gadget disclosure: I was issued a company-furnished new PC model for the last 18 years. With the OS completely gutted (no YouTube, no Google) it was simply a work station box. I once ran sys admin services on the company’s Unix servers, and disabled any services that my former company directed me to do. Result: PC platforms that are “free range” open systems will be a new challenge, basically requiring minor firewall upgrades. For me, the preferred PC will be a laptop which also is a high-end gaming platform (a contradiction in term to some folks). Appreciate your inputs. @SledDriver
@SledDriver Yes, re gadgets. May also get a PC gadget, next year, because I enjoy comparing games like SP and SR2 on different platforms.
Forget auto-roll comment. User error. Did not have gear fully retracted (AG4) when attacking Snowstone misile dual batteries at sub-1000 mph speed. This equals sluggish pitch response. AG2 not activated. Landing is possible, but, tricky at 300 mph without using AG2. In the future, I will use AG2 at lower speeds, and provide you feedback. Tested on iPhone XR, iPad Pro and iMac desktop. Not tested on Google Pixel, which frankly has less satisfactory mobile GUI response times. @SledDriver
@SledDriver I activate AG1 during my normal test process on your particular builds. Then, deactivate AG1 upon approching targets or landing sites. AG2 has been tested independently of AG1. AG2 on your builds simply causes wild results at low speeds on my mobiles devices: Google Pixel tablet, iPad Pro tablet, iPhone XR. Keyboards of PC and Mac desktops react differently to SP and SR2. I have noticed a minor autoroll clockwise on this build.
@SledDriver Correct, prefer pitch to be stronger independent of AG2. Activating AG2 works sorta OK on my desktop, yet, when activated wreaks havoc (e.g. uncontrollable performance) on my mobile devices. Dunno why this happens, I'm merely a tester.
No lag, on simple platforms. At low speeds this model could use more pitch IMHO. My 5 Teraflop iPhone XR test was the first device used in testing. Desktop and iPad Pro yield same performance results. From the Apple perspective, I hope my inputs help you. @SledDriver
Beautiful build. Functional controls work well. Build more!
Good build. More Pitch control is preferred when eliminating Snowstone Missile battery. Likewise, more pitch at low speeds, for direct elimnation of Jundroo's Wright island naval missiles. OK, I test multiple launch points and all targets. Tested via both desktop and iPhone XR. Comments are positive feedback. I like the build!
Yes, easy to fly! Again, good job. @QingyuZhou
FYI, this CH-47 build flys better on my iPhone than on my desktop.
However, Jundroo LLC will receive a bug report re the silly “This Download Is Too Large for Your Platform” annoying banners.
Tested on Mac desktop. Not yet tested on my 5 teraflop iPhone XR. Will let you know if any oddities occur.
@AchuTMM Built useing sticks and stones and SP V1.0 on a tablet. Moderators advised me too keep older posts available. I guess so folks can argue over old junk that I really want to scrap.
Extremely unique build! Fun to test.
@DragonFire007 Sorta. But I built aircraft models that were of similar construction to that olde time period. I'm terrible at attempting full replicas. Anyhow, I'm taking a break from SP builds for a short while.
OK. This would be a great build even without bombs; with functional bombs, it's wow! @RamboJutter
Tested on a slow Google Pixel tablet. FYI.
Very nice! All AG functions work. Suggestion: instead of side-mounted bombs, you could easily install missiles.
@SledDriver Amen?
Credit where credit is due! This qualifies a replica IMHO, based upon flight characteristics. The extra work you put into your side-loaded shape is extraordinary. Tested on OSX.
From other comments to your post, well, I deem there must be evil masters somewhere that can change entire worlds via voice command (ever seen the movie "Matrix") so, it's a humorous line of quasi-engineering inquiry if "people" exist in digital worlds. @Gravity
Ask AndrewGarrison re: people dwelling in within a digital game. (I’m merely a rocket scientist not a game programmer) @MajesticAerospace
@Gravity you’ve shared a few Olde parts with the community, thanks. Time for me to re-package Olde parts I’ve shared before, but, frankly are on no ones radar since they are Olde. Don’t newbie builders realize that Olde parts can be added wherever needed in current designs?
Beautiful build, great handling!
Comment: looks worth testing and evaluating. Will not do so when Required Mods prevent standard web downloads. My humble, free opinion.