8,578 Synthex4060 Comments

  • Phi-4 - VTOL fighter jet 8 months ago

    @VertolTycoon7588 thx for the advice, however gyroscopes were not implemented in the game when I designed this plane. Feel free to create an improved version.

    +1
  • Peregrine 2022 2.7 years ago

    Wow! Impressive work! I'm glad you enjoyed my build as a modding platform :)

  • Peregrine Falcon - Dive bomber 2.7 years ago

    @RKOdynamics Sure, go ahead!

  • The Oppressor 4.6 years ago

    @Brendorkus OH cool thanks for notifying me. Too bad he didn't use the main feature, though :p

  • F-86 Sabre 4.8 years ago

    @Mustang51 @Subnerdica Thanks a lot !

    +1
  • HLH-557 - Heavy transport helicopter 5.4 years ago

    @SelectAKey I would defninitely like to see that !

  • HLH-557 - Heavy transport helicopter 5.4 years ago

    @AWESOMENESS360 Thanks ! It's definitely the vibe I was looking for; I deliberately didn't look up anything so as to let my imagination do the work, but yeah it comes close :p

    +1
  • HLH-557 - Heavy transport helicopter 5.4 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx Haha, thanks a lot !

  • XC-204 Grasshopper 5.9 years ago

    @Giggitymerf
    I could shift the CoG forward, but then the CoL is too far back. The idea here was to have a CoG roughly in the middle of 4 equally loaded wheels as well as 4 equally loaded wings, so the CoG/CoL location is pretty much determined by that. Such a design is automatically pitch-heavy because of the weight distribution. And because of the 2 set of wings, the pitch control is less stable (hard to explain without schematics).

    The pitch surfaces I set just so that you can maneuver confortably but not too sensitive so you don't get into spins too easily. You can fully pull the yoke for a short moment, it will still be stable enough, but if you do so too long then it might lose control. The gyro is just here to recover from that.

    If you think about it, most subsonic planes have wings that have a long span but are not very long. In terms of load-spreading this is far from ideal. A long wingspan means a big bending moment on the wing-fuselage connection, and only the middle of the fuselage is well supported. So all the heavy stuff is put in the middle.

    In that regard a longer wing with less wingspan would be better. But that would lead to more turbulent airflow on the wings, so less efficiency. Then why not 4 or even 6 smaller wings instead of 2 ?
    Now you can spread the weight of your cargo and engines over a longer span. Better for the structure ! But now your pitch inertia get's quite high.

    And there is also the unstability effect. You're not just pitching about a songle Col/CoG but it's more like have 2 CoL's and one CoG, and you get higher pitch moment's beyond a certain angle of attack.

    TL:DR
    The unstability is inherent to the design. The plane behaves just fine if you don't do anything too crazy, the gyro is just here to recover from spins if you do go over the line.

  • Cobra - Roadster 6.0 years ago

    @GontarMotors Thanks for your appreciation !

  • XNF-381 Dragonfly 6.2 years ago

    Hehe thanks ! Glad you guys appreciate it !

  • MWAS-417 - Trident 6.3 years ago

    @Delphinos Well thanks a lot, kind sir !

  • SCANE Goliath 6.3 years ago

    Glad you like it :D

  • Goblin 2 TV 6.3 years ago

    Can't figure if it's ugly or pretty. But I love the way it behaves. One thing though, when I use the brakes/reverse thrust, it goes into crazy spins.

  • XB-010 Ring - Experimental biplane 6.4 years ago

    @BaconEggs Thanks :)

  • VWS-712 Heartbreaker 6.4 years ago

    @MasterShi sure as long as it's credited as successor. How can it be better it's already perfect :D

  • VWS-712 Heartbreaker 6.4 years ago

    @MasterShi glad you like it :)

  • Soviet jet concept 6.5 years ago

    @ThePrototype yeah it's actually not far off from a Yak-15. But I still like that guy's twist on it :)

  • Meteor VTOL Mk I (Capt. Blackadder) 6.5 years ago

    kind of crazy, kind of awesome, I love it !

  • XP-808 Arrow 6.7 years ago

    Thanks for your nice words :D

  • XP-808 Arrow 6.7 years ago

    @doge Actually tried again to break it and nothing happened. It used to be a problem during development when the controls were more sensitive, but now it's just fine and you can safely pitch up 10°. But thanks for the tip :)

  • SBC Valoran Class Valoran 6.7 years ago

    I'm upvoting cause it looks cool but my PC can't handle it XD

    +1
  • 2EB-29 Leech 6.7 years ago

    Thanks !

  • The Oppressor 6.7 years ago

    @F104Deathtrap I wasn't going for stealthy here, I just wanted to get that ominous vibe from a wide flying wing, but thanks for the tip, I hadn't noticed this fact :)

  • The Oppressor 6.7 years ago

    who me ? naaah :D

  • WH40K Valkyrie 6.7 years ago

    Really nice build, cool details, and very stable flight !

    +1
  • Automa H3 - Rescue helicopter 6.7 years ago

    Thanks !

  • Spad IIII.3b 6.7 years ago

    Awesome ! Love the detail on the engines and the cockpit view !

  • F4X Jaguar - VTOL Interceptor 6.7 years ago

    Thanks !! Much appreciated !

  • VOLVO-FH3 v.1 6.8 years ago

    Cool cockpit features !

  • TSA-IV Breacher 6.8 years ago

    @LEOPARDtec Thanks !!

  • CM-122 Emissary 6.8 years ago

    Thanks ! They're actually the starting point of this design, and I consider re-using them at some point

  • SU-79 UMF Hacker 6.9 years ago

    Cool looks and nice controls !

  • Naboo N1 StarFighter V9.RodWan (Outdated see V11) 6.9 years ago

    @RodWan nah it's not fun if someone already did it nicely. But don't worry I have plenty of other ideas ;)

  • Naboo N1 StarFighter V9.RodWan (Outdated see V11) 6.9 years ago

    I have been emaning to do the N-1 and even started on it but I will never be close to your result. Well done !

  • Mass Effect Andromeda Nomad 7.0 years ago

    AMAZING ! They should add a Mass Effect tag :p

  • Buffalo Blue (Buggy challenge) 7.2 years ago

    Thanks :)

  • A-25A "Pilum" LightAttacker 7.3 years ago

    I love it !

  • F-380 Thunderstorm 7.3 years ago

    Thanks a lot !

  • Hubschrauber m. Taumelscheibe 7.3 years ago

    Amazing imitation of a helicopter's mechanism !

  • The Observer 7.3 years ago

    @Rcb1235 Thanks :)

  • Saab JA37DI Viggen 7.3 years ago

    Good job, man !

  • HA-53A Crocodile 7.4 years ago

    Wow ! I think this is the best handling chopper I've seen on this game so far !

  • Spad XIII (guynemer) (Museum ed.) 7.4 years ago

    I would pronounce it "Geen-mare" (G as in Gone), but I could be wrong, names can be pronoucned differently depending on the region they come from, sometimes. The squadron's name is Les Cigognes (the Storks).
    Really cool replica, nice attention to detail !

  • Lockheed F-16 Phoenix Falcon 7.4 years ago

    Dat detail on the landing gear :o

  • Mass Effect Andromeda - Andromeda Initiative Survey Ship Tempest 7.5 years ago

    @Amiller822 Technically this is still a colony ship I guess

  • Lark - VTOL Interceptor 7.5 years ago

    @Miniplanes I would say there are several aspects to this.
    -Some knowledge of physics and basic flight principles
    -Experiment with aesthetic design : build a plane with a simple configuration but take the time to play around with the parts and shapes. You don't have to use a gazillion of them, just make each part count.
    -Experiment with physics : see what happens when you move the CoT, CoF and CoG, try out different control modes (canards, flaps, using rotators etc...). It can be frustrating sometimes especially if you're not so at ease with the theory, but can be very instructive.
    -Know how the game works : how the parts can be changed, how they attach, how you can nudge them, and some XML modding can't hurt. Again, you just have to try things. Sometimes it just doesn't work, but you can learn from it.

    And for these last 3 aspects it can be of rgeat help to reverse-engineer planes from other players. Look at the parts that can be interesting in detail, how the CoT CoF and CoG are located, what design tricks have been used.

    I hope this helps you !

  • Lark - VTOL Interceptor 7.5 years ago

    @AtomicFerret007 Thanks a lot, man !

  • Lark - VTOL Interceptor 7.5 years ago

    @JMicah4 Sure ! Don't forget to credit me and be sure to send me a link when it's up !

  • Lark - VTOL Interceptor 7.5 years ago

    Whoa thanks guys ! Much appreciated !