@Graingy Eh, we could always go to War Thunder damage models
But from my experience, you can actually get decent damage distributions if you carefully XML mod everything
@Dracul0Anderson Same here, like the NASA lifting bodies, but almost all real-life concepts and prototypes have either some kind of lift or stabilizers. Even helicopters, if I understand correctly, generate lift and thrust simultaneously via rotorblade. This is literally just an engine and a gyroscope lol
This will be my first of several aircraft that I will consider part of my 100k special. Thank you guys for everything, let us continue flying onward- with or without wings!
@TheMouse Well, yes, it's both
CoM usually needs to be extremely or at least considerably close to the front of the CoL for PSM planes, but I still found it quite difficult to make PSM planes work properly with high-lift wings even when the CoM is reasonably close to the CoL. My best guess for this is because PSM occurs when the wing stalls, which is a little difficult to do when the wings generate 3 times more lift than usually, essentially making the plane almost stall resistant: the last thing you want when making a post STALL maneuvering plane!
Though you're right on the last part, SP stall physics aren't perfect, so maybe this isn't the case and I'm a noob at making PSM aircraft lol (which is also true, I genuinely have not made a 100% satisfactory PSM aircraft to this day, closest I've gotten is Vector). But at least in theory, this should be somewhat true. I'll have to do more tests eventually.
@Boeing727200F Agreed
Yes
+1@Rb2h That would be harder
+1But I can sure try
T
+1@JSTQ Np :D
+1@JSTQ Absolutely! I can even tag you on a few unreleased ones
+1I actually saw the YA-9 which this evolved into recently :D
@Graingy True, but it’s better than nothing!
@fffzzension It's just the demonstration, the full version's coming out next year
@Graingy Eh, we could always go to War Thunder damage models
+1But from my experience, you can actually get decent damage distributions if you carefully XML mod everything
@Graingy That's always an option
Or maybe make explosives run on a damage system like non-explosive cannons and guns?
Ok, SP2 is gonna be straight peak 🔥🔥
MP is a bit laggy, but roughly 45% of the time it's because of nukes
Happy birthday bro! :D
Here are some cakes:
🎂🎂🎂
Absolute cinema
T
@Dracul0Anderson Fair enough
But, those were just concepts/experiments, no? They weren't considered too highly practical?
Special Request 2:
@YarisHatchback
Mailing List 6:
@SimplyElegant
@ComradeBazookaBall
Special Request 1:
@Boeing727200F
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
@NominalSituation
@rickofrolls
Mailing List 4:
+1@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
@M109Simp
@LoganAviation
@B1BLancer
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirWorks
@Dracul0Anderson Same here, like the NASA lifting bodies, but almost all real-life concepts and prototypes have either some kind of lift or stabilizers. Even helicopters, if I understand correctly, generate lift and thrust simultaneously via rotorblade. This is literally just an engine and a gyroscope lol
@TheMouse Thanks :D
@LunarEclipseSP I agree ngl, getting the F-2's colors right is HARD ;-;
+1@Kav Thanks :D
+12-seater falcon, a rare find. Nice!
+2This will be my first of several aircraft that I will consider part of my 100k special. Thank you guys for everything, let us continue flying onward- with or without wings!
Special Request 2:
@YarisHatchback
Mailing List 6:
@SimplyElegant
@ComradeBazookaBall
Special Request 1:
@Boeing727200F
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
@NominalSituation
@rickofrolls
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
+1@M109Simp
@LoganAviation
@B1BLancer
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirWorks
Tag Request:
@Boeing727200F
@SimplyElegant
PEA Host:
@Monarchii
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
@NominalSituation
@rickofrolls
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
@M109Simp
@LoganAviation
@B1BLancer
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirWorks
@Kav You wanted tag?
+1Iranian Sabrejet!
+1@Kav Is quite fitting since we also had the Thunderjet around the same time
Sabrejet!! :D
+1@Erc90F4RU Thank you! :D
@TheMouse Agreed, you've explained it perfectly with the abrupt movements and lower stall speeds, those are the main issues I've had to deal with
+1@IQinventory Thanks :D
+1@TheMouse Well, yes, it's both
CoM usually needs to be extremely or at least considerably close to the front of the CoL for PSM planes, but I still found it quite difficult to make PSM planes work properly with high-lift wings even when the CoM is reasonably close to the CoL. My best guess for this is because PSM occurs when the wing stalls, which is a little difficult to do when the wings generate 3 times more lift than usually, essentially making the plane almost stall resistant: the last thing you want when making a post STALL maneuvering plane!
Though you're right on the last part, SP stall physics aren't perfect, so maybe this isn't the case and I'm a noob at making PSM aircraft lol (which is also true, I genuinely have not made a 100% satisfactory PSM aircraft to this day, closest I've gotten is Vector). But at least in theory, this should be somewhat true. I'll have to do more tests eventually.
T
+1