@GrowAGarden Which is precisely the point, Majakalona. The idea is not quality, but quantity, these things can get ripped apart pretty easily, only issue is that you'd have to do that thousands of times.
Update regarding the S C O U R G E enemies:
The thumbnails weren't glitched, they just needed time to load. SCOURGE jets will roll out as planned, followed by the youngest and likely best generation of my PEAs.
@YarisSedan At first, no. But after a long time of soul searching, learning, and bracing myself for low-part building, I've finally cracked the code.
I was just like the rest, but there is one difference: I came back to redeem myself...
Also, you probably noticed that they're all labeled as "Generation 4." So let's break down the generations of PEAs: Generation 1: My earliest PEAs, some of which weren't even PEAs. These can be considered the proving grounds, testing the waters to see if I could really do PEAs. Once I got the hang of things, the PEAduction could commence. Generation 2: Intermediate stage PEAs. There were tons of these, and I somewhat consider them my Golden Age, but admittedly they weren't truly PEAs in some ways, even if they were quite cool. We can also consider this Generation the "filler aircraft," as Gen 2 PEAs often explored topics that hadn't been built much on SP like the A-20, PB2Y, MiG-13, U-2R, Buccaneer, etc. Generation 3: The most recent PEA Generation until now, these weren't even labeled as "PEAs," but rather "X-Part [Plane name]," e.g. 27-Part Starfighter. Despite lacking the title and aesthetic of PEAs, they were and even with G4 still are probably closest to the mark in terms of part-efficiency. Generation 4: The newest and almost undeniably best of my PEAs, built with few parts while retaining maximum aesthetics. This generation of PEAs also notably has superior flight performance to any of my others in the realism category.
@Erc90F4RU @livingston
Lockheed's is sometimes called the P-80, but later on during the Korean War Era, it was commonly recognized as F-80, meaning that it was effectively called both long enough to have both titles lol
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirWorks
@KPLBall Noice, Topako's on the list :D
@Unwanted Oh nice :D
I learned it from @B1BLancer
@KPLBall Aite
@Unwanted I don't use photoshop either lol
I just screenshot, edit it on a Google Slide, screenshot again, and boom, you've got a thumbnail
@Unwanted Noice :D
@Pancevolant
+1@Erionh
+1@LUPIN
@YarisHatchBack
@Edmund13
+1@ImperialIndustries
@JSTQ
@LettuceRob119
+1@SPSidearm (Hi old enemy, I'm back)
@SomeSPGuywholikelore
@4267MangoMustard
+1@M109Simp
@RB107
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1@SamuelJamesCastor
@LunarEclipseSP
@Monarchii
+1@Firecharge123 (hi again)
@Rb2H
@BluesynVA
+1@Hahahahaahahshs
@SILVERPANZER
@HUDDistance
+1@F16XL
@CaptainBrayden
@Windshifter1
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@JABH
@Wz
+1@YarisSedan
@Boeing727200F
@Chaunhkhoa
+1@CrestelAeronautics
@Polish2
@TheUltimatePlaneLover (ey that's me)
+1@TheMouse
@Panzerwaifu69
I'ma stea- borrow your taglist from y're last post
+2@Karroc9522
@DeeganwithaBazooka
@Christiant2
@GrowAGarden Which is precisely the point, Majakalona. The idea is not quality, but quantity, these things can get ripped apart pretty easily, only issue is that you'd have to do that thousands of times.
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
@NominalSituation
@rickofrolls
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
@M109Simp
@LoganAviation
@B1BLancer
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirWorks
@rickofrolls Definitely bigger than 75
Nice, the Otesk War is back on! :D
+1I remember Topako, one of my finest WWII-era mediums generated by the Otesk War.
@Monarchii Honestly yea I'm gonna see where I can watch that sounds good ngl
Ah, I do love my French Doritos
+2Update regarding the
S C O U R G Eenemies:The thumbnails weren't glitched, they just needed time to load.
SCOURGEjets will roll out as planned, followed by the youngest and likely best generation of my PEAs.@KPLBall Ohh aite
@Monarchii PEAs it is
@YarisSedan At first, no. But after a long time of soul searching, learning, and bracing myself for low-part building, I've finally cracked the code.
+1I was just like the rest, but there is one difference: I came back to redeem myself...
The USS Beast is an icon of SP, I'll never forget my amazement discovering it and the fleet for the first time. Glad to see it getting an upgrade :D
+1@KPLBall
1. Absolutely! :D
2. Eventually, yes
3. TUPL's legend status has dropped by 4000!
Yeah, I had to return to my roots eventually lol
Also, you probably noticed that they're all labeled as "Generation 4." So let's break down the generations of PEAs:
Generation 1: My earliest PEAs, some of which weren't even PEAs. These can be considered the proving grounds, testing the waters to see if I could really do PEAs. Once I got the hang of things, the PEAduction could commence.
Generation 2: Intermediate stage PEAs. There were tons of these, and I somewhat consider them my Golden Age, but admittedly they weren't truly PEAs in some ways, even if they were quite cool. We can also consider this Generation the "filler aircraft," as Gen 2 PEAs often explored topics that hadn't been built much on SP like the A-20, PB2Y, MiG-13, U-2R, Buccaneer, etc.
Generation 3: The most recent PEA Generation until now, these weren't even labeled as "PEAs," but rather "X-Part [Plane name]," e.g. 27-Part Starfighter. Despite lacking the title and aesthetic of PEAs, they were and even with G4 still are probably closest to the mark in terms of part-efficiency.
Generation 4: The newest and almost undeniably best of my PEAs, built with few parts while retaining maximum aesthetics. This generation of PEAs also notably has superior flight performance to any of my others in the realism category.
Special Guest:
@Monarchii
You might want to see this
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
@NominalSituation
@rickofrolls
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
@M109Simp
@LoganAviation
@B1BLancer
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirWorks
@Monarchii Same but without the "again," I've never watched it ;-;
@Monarchii Yes, Rico: Kaboom.
@Erc90F4RU @livingston
Lockheed's is sometimes called the P-80, but later on during the Korean War Era, it was commonly recognized as F-80, meaning that it was effectively called both long enough to have both titles lol
Cool plen :D
@SILVERPANZER It was, wasn't it...
I wonder where they are now...
T
+1