Yeah I understand, the caravelle was actually kinda an issue for me earlier since it technically fell under the challenge requirements but it looked like a much more modern design. I just didn’t want a bunch of more “modern” jet designs.
This entry pushes the requirements of the challenge a tad bit much, When I said early jet airliners I meant the very first ones of which didn’t really fit the conventional norms of jet airliner we see today. This is like a DC-9 type airliner which had its first flight in 1965 which falls outside the challenge requirements. I’ll allow it but this isn’t really what I wanted for the challenge.
I think he is trying to say that he wants to be able to have the hollow fuselage have pieces cut out of it, Kinda like a pizza slice if viewed from the cross section view. This would make structures like bomb bays, hollow cockpits, and concave shapes much easier as you would not have to panel the entire section in order to get an opening in that section of fuselage. @AndrewGarrison
Ok so basically take your plane off of its cockpit and save the whole thing as a subassembly. Then download my challenge and attach your subassembly to my cockpit. Then your groups entry should count as a successor to my challenge. @gmmmsoares
Huh a rotodyne, now that is something I didn’t expect, well lol I guess It falls under the criteria, I didn’t even think of this airliner configuration!
Look, the entry has to be a completely original new design, you tried to dupe me by entering an aircraft that is mostly not even your own. I do not trust you and I will not be accepting this or any future entries from you. @ToxicAviationAviation
You betrayed my trust and had it not been for @Cereal I would not have caught your attempt to cheat, I no longer trust the integrity of your entries and as such I will no longer be accepting any more entries from you. Cheaters never prosper...
Look I let people push things a bit into the late 50s but a 60s jet like this that is still very clearly meant for military purposes and in a military paint scheme pushes the rules too far...
Yes
Psst, your 4 parts short buddy
Yeah I understand, the caravelle was actually kinda an issue for me earlier since it technically fell under the challenge requirements but it looked like a much more modern design. I just didn’t want a bunch of more “modern” jet designs.
This entry pushes the requirements of the challenge a tad bit much, When I said early jet airliners I meant the very first ones of which didn’t really fit the conventional norms of jet airliner we see today. This is like a DC-9 type airliner which had its first flight in 1965 which falls outside the challenge requirements. I’ll allow it but this isn’t really what I wanted for the challenge.
pretty nice paneling my dude
I’m glad you enjoy them, now I just need to overcome my overwhelming laziness and finish them @Biggles15
+1Like this @AndrewGarrison
I think he is trying to say that he wants to be able to have the hollow fuselage have pieces cut out of it, Kinda like a pizza slice if viewed from the cross section view. This would make structures like bomb bays, hollow cockpits, and concave shapes much easier as you would not have to panel the entire section in order to get an opening in that section of fuselage. @AndrewGarrison
+2(͠≖ ͜ʖ͠≖)
+2Impressive, great job man!
Ok so basically take your plane off of its cockpit and save the whole thing as a subassembly. Then download my challenge and attach your subassembly to my cockpit. Then your groups entry should count as a successor to my challenge. @gmmmsoares
+3I agree, it just seems unnecessary to me
+7Yo, you forgot to cover the registration plaque on the 3rd image you forehead, also 👌
+4Yeah of course @RamboJutter
Huh a rotodyne, now that is something I didn’t expect, well lol I guess It falls under the criteria, I didn’t even think of this airliner configuration!
+3No problem @LieutenantSOT
+1Look, the entry has to be a completely original new design, you tried to dupe me by entering an aircraft that is mostly not even your own. I do not trust you and I will not be accepting this or any future entries from you. @ToxicAviationAviation
+3You pointed out that @ToxicAviationAviation was cheating to me, that’s a good thing that I’m thankful for @Cereal
+1Why are you saying sorry? I’m thanking you lol! @Cereal
+2You betrayed my trust and had it not been for @Cereal I would not have caught your attempt to cheat, I no longer trust the integrity of your entries and as such I will no longer be accepting any more entries from you. Cheaters never prosper...
+1Nice! the flight model is still a bit wonky but dragon is dragon (now make Moon next ;) )
+1Here is the link to to the original build! Bonk
+1your post is disqualified for being a copy of another players aircraft @ToxicAviationAviation
oh my @Cereal thanks for bringing this to my attention
Thanks, I will @RgenejManufacturer
It is an unfinished build of mine @TankmanNewgrounds
No @RgenejManufacturer
Yes, read the rules @winterro
I’m sorry but this just doesn’t meet the challenge criteria and goes way past the wiggle room that I’ll allow
Look I let people push things a bit into the late 50s but a 60s jet like this that is still very clearly meant for military purposes and in a military paint scheme pushes the rules too far...
This is a military cargo aircraft... not an airliner, plus it’s not even from the correct era...
Sure @TatsuTheCleaningFairy
Yes @Fictionalshipmaker @ManBunEren
+1No, it is much to small to qualify as a true airliner @EverettStormy
sigh yeah @LieutenantSOT
+1If you want you can release a modded unlisted version but the main post must not be modded for fairness sake @Kennneth
I would prefer no mods @Kennneth
Knock yourself out @SodiumIodide
Alright @ACBrasil
Please read the rules, this entry is under the minimum part count limit!
Sure, so long as they are era appropriate airliners such as the 314 Clipper for example @BogdanX
Read the rules. This is under 100 parts!
Alright just make sure to pull your weight! @12705129
No read the rules @12705129
This plane does not meet the challenge requirements, it is under the minimum part requirement of 100 parts!
No it must be above 100 parts @ExiledKristen
No, it’s an unfinished build of mine @ItsZander
Yup @Krmo
Epic @CRJ900Pilot
Yup it counts! @CRJ900Pilot