Awesome. I’m not even a gundam fan, but this is one of the coolest things I’ve seen on the site. That headsculpt is fantastic too.
...
Please tag me when you release that Zeta fighter!
@Griffon1 I meant concave 90 degree angles. The fuselage angles are convex so I dont think they would reflect radar well. here is a discussion explaining it. The second response has a helpful diagram.
Cool design. Nice variety of features. I like the low speed wings. I do have to say that I couldn’t get the “auto cobra” to work, but it isn’t very hard to do the maneuver with the vectoring as it is anyway
Evidence:
SR2 has an R in it...
2 is the number of lenses on a VR headset...
Coincidence??
I think not!
...
But there is more!
A line was removed from the letter R,
The line was diagonal...
VR has 2! diagonal lines in the V!
There also happens to be a “2” in SP2!
...
Now you may wonder what the “S” means.
S is short for SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS,
The noise my computer would make if I tried to run VR SimplePlanes!
@Johnnyynf on snoflakes's ft guide I saw this code (I think for breaks), but it might be useful for torque simulation. web page
It's towards the middle of the page and says linear wheel rotation
I heard that FT can be used to make wheels spin more or less. I wonder if the gearing programming used on this could be used to program tires to behave differently for different gears
@Storm51 @WingsOfSteel
Yeah these are really cool looking compared to the other mustangs. It's design also reminds me of the AMC Javelin.
Technically I think collectors view the 73-78 mustang as worse, but these still seem to be less popular than most other years.
Thanks for upvotes and the spotlight @UgandanKnuckles y @AtlasMilitaryIndustries
Awesome. I’m not even a gundam fan, but this is one of the coolest things I’ve seen on the site. That headsculpt is fantastic too.
+3...
Please tag me when you release that Zeta fighter!
Looks like a winner
@BeastHunter I’m probably going to have to give you some spotlights to rub it in
Lol
Looks better than SimplePlanes should! (And under 500 parts)
+1Looks great
Thanks upvoters
@BeastHunter, you just put me over 3000 pts
Nice!
+1@Griffon1 I meant concave 90 degree angles. The fuselage angles are convex so I dont think they would reflect radar well. here is a discussion explaining it. The second response has a helpful diagram.
+1Looks really good. I couldn’t get it to transform on mobile, but I like the paneling
Always like the dc3, nice build
F-35, right?
Nice. The details look great
Very stable, good for harassing the convoy
Nice! 1968 is my favorite year of c10 so this is pretty close. The detailing on the sides and engine is good
When I played War Thunder years ago this would always happen to me in tank battles
T
That’s a lotta detail
The person is good too
@Griffon1 the shape looks like is would minimize radar detection because of the “no right angles”
+1There is one impostor Above the surfUS
+1This would make a great competitor to the f35
+1Looks good. I wish SP came with underwater camera already activated. Looks fun
+1Cool design. Nice variety of features. I like the low speed wings. I do have to say that I couldn’t get the “auto cobra” to work, but it isn’t very hard to do the maneuver with the vectoring as it is anyway
Simple Planes VR secretly leaked in SP2 video?
Evidence:
+8SR2 has an R in it...
2 is the number of lenses on a VR headset...
Coincidence??
I think not!
...
But there is more!
A line was removed from the letter R,
The line was diagonal...
VR has 2! diagonal lines in the V!
There also happens to be a “2” in SP2!
...
Now you may wonder what the “S” means.
S is short for SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS,
The noise my computer would make if I tried to run VR SimplePlanes!
Looks great
Interesting design for sure
Tail markings that will terrify even the most experienced fighter pilots
When given a glider challenge
make a powered airplane
Exciting.
Now I have to buy a vr headset, remember my computer password, and maybe figure out how to make a cockpit...
Nice
More like unavailability
+2(The video doesn’t load)
Awesome!
I saw one similar to this once
Impressive detail. Is this mobile friendly?
Never noticed it had changed (last time I played was 2019 before I made my account last month)
+1Honestly the new version looks better to me.
Flashbacks to the Laurel vs Yanny debate from years ago
+2"14th" lol
Haha the tail “:D”
nice
I actually tried to make something just like this last week. Cool to see someone else had the same idea amd was able to do it.
+1Wow. Very impressive work
+1This looks good. The camber is interesting
+1Cool replica
Great detailing
That drawing is great
@12705129 here is the corvette c3 you requested!
This is awesome. Why classic chevys all look great in this shade of red lol. Very nice attention to detail
@Johnnyynf on snoflakes's ft guide I saw this code (I think for breaks), but it might be useful for torque simulation.
+1web page
It's towards the middle of the page and says linear wheel rotation
@210100 my android has an escape hatch for the battery when it crashes. (It pops into 3 pieces lol)
+2I sawbthe thumbnail and wanted to make an airplane mode joke... and so did everyone else lol.
+2Nice plane, was this built on mobile?
I heard that FT can be used to make wheels spin more or less. I wonder if the gearing programming used on this could be used to program tires to behave differently for different gears
@Storm51 @WingsOfSteel
+1Yeah these are really cool looking compared to the other mustangs. It's design also reminds me of the AMC Javelin.
Technically I think collectors view the 73-78 mustang as worse, but these still seem to be less popular than most other years.
Wow. Nice work. I wish there was something like group b modern day