14.7k Viper3000ad Comments

  • RX-3 Delaer SAR UAS + JATO 5.1 years ago

    @JolyLoly thanks for the vote, happy flights

  • RX-3 Delaer SAR UAS + JATO 5.1 years ago

    @Leehopard @sodiumchloride @armyguy1534 thanks for the vote and the spotlight, happy flights

    +1
  • RX-3 Delaer SAR UAS + JATO 5.1 years ago

    @Bife thanks friend , always love your work

    +1
  • RX-3 Delaer SAR UAS + JATO 5.1 years ago

    @dimkal Thanks for the vote and the spotlight. let's hope to see it someday in reality in the Greek skies, even without jato :-)

    +1
  • Hang Glider 5.1 years ago

    so underrated

  • RX-3 Delaer SAR UAS + JATO 5.1 years ago

    @johnnyboythepilot Thanks for the vote and the spotlight. Happy flights

    +1
  • RX-3 Delaer SAR UAS + JATO 5.1 years ago

    @Gameboi14 Thanks, first upvote !

  • RX-3 Delaer SAR UAS + JATO 5.1 years ago

    @jamesplanesii @armyguy534 @blackhattAircraft

  • RX-3 Delaer SAR UAS + JATO 5.1 years ago

    @bifie @chancey21 @Gameboi14

  • Bölkov BO-105 (Red Bull) 5.1 years ago

    @ByArchi True, you can do "stall" turns with no gyros, it's nice !

  • Bölkov BO-105 (Red Bull) 5.1 years ago

    Finally some helicopters without gyros !

  • MH-47G Nightstalker mk.II 5.1 years ago

    It's better with the gyro off. Not bad, keep it up

  • Some Of My Drawing... 5.1 years ago

    The tree was nice. No one has made a tree in SP and it's also very surrealistic. 👍

  • Featured aircraft be like 5.1 years ago

    Yes I noticed that. It's over a week , I was wondering if there is a change in sp policy. By the way who get the features ?

    +2
  • Leonardo RO-7 Tyton 5.1 years ago

    Very good construction, I like how the wings bent by the movement of the air. A little objection maybe to the elevators, I think it might have been more reasonable to have the whole panel moving and not just the trim tab. Happy flights

    +1
  • H-101 Alicanto 5.1 years ago

    A superbly weighed helicopter, CoM is slightly ahead of the main rotor. It can maneuver with great stability without gyros and hold its position without interference. The auto-hovering system is innovative, but in my opinion they didn't even need the gyroscope; the rest of the stabilizer work is very clever. I would prefer the collective pitch to be adjusted with VTOL, but it still works fine. Excellent work maybe a template for how helicopters should build. Worth a spotlight !

    +1
  • MI-24 5.1 years ago

    Τηε shape is close to a real model, but there are helicopter engines that you can use, also don't need gyros :-) If you like take a look in this !EKAB@Aviator007

  • Fairchild Dornier 328JET 5.1 years ago

    Np

  • Robots will save humanity ? (Or Drones in SAR) 5.1 years ago

    @BlackBoA yes it is really very smooth, it is very difficult to get the slopes with exactly the same photorealistic effect. I hope it's good enough.

  • Robots will save humanity ? (Or Drones in SAR) 5.1 years ago

    @Toxicgamer88 @Dimkal @Flipposmc

  • Robots will save humanity ? (Or Drones in SAR) 5.1 years ago

    The system will be based on a large-scale, autonomous, fixed-wing, novel Blended Wing Body (BWB) UAV configuration, as well as a portable ground control station (GCS). The DELAER RX-3 mission involves cruising to the point of interest for up to 65km, payload delivery, and cruising back to the base of operations. RX-3 payload has been selected to support a wide range of humanitarian missions (life rafts, medical equipment, provisions etc.).

  • Fairchild Dornier 328JET 5.1 years ago

    Βeautiful design with a difficult construction, it needs a bit of work on its flight characteristics, but it has great dynamics.

  • AH-64 APACHE 5.1 years ago

    It had a nice shape, but helicopters don't need gyros to fly. Keep up the good work, i am sure that the next it would be even better.

  • Change of policy ? 5.1 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 ...

  • Change of policy ? 5.1 years ago

    Νο Features ?

  • SAKUR RK6 5.1 years ago

    flies well. Keep up the good work

  • B14.5 Hapalua-Fortress 4.0 5.1 years ago

    Fantastic work on the engines . Keep up the good work

  • Cessna 172 skyhawk 5.1 years ago

    Little fast for a Cessna 172 and weaker on the pitch athority, though with almost real cockpit. Very interesting details especially at your level. Congratulations and keep up the good work.

  • Martin Scout™ II 5.1 years ago

    like it

    +1
  • gaer -112 5.1 years ago

    I like it. It has the right shape for a general aviation aircraft. Flaps are inverted, but they are generally on the right track. Keep up the good work.

    +1
  • Landing at KSEA whit an engine failiure 5.1 years ago

    what is that ? x-plane 11 ?

  • D-11 groß Vogel 5.1 years ago

    Congratulations very nice polygonal style with beautiful wings and also original design. Maybe next time you will remember to turn off the countermeasures dispenser in the cockpit. when i press v a smoke comes out of the cabin. :-) Also great job on the machine gun towers.

    +1
  • Ol'Fashioned [Functional Part-Based Instruments] 5.1 years ago

    Not bad, good cockpit visibility, but no flaps and trim. Keep up the good work

  • TIE/LN Fighter 5.1 years ago

    cool

  • NXCub 5.2 years ago

    @Chancey21 So strange, after 40 votes and 180+ downloads and no one noticed ...
    Anyway keep up the good work , the site needs more general aviation models

    +1
  • NXCub 5.2 years ago

    It's beautiful as before, but I can't make it accelerate > 60. Also the tail rotor that recreates the prop, seems little odd because it stays "on" even in zero throttle.

    +1
  • TIE Fighter teaser 5.2 years ago

    Πολύ όμορφο, βλέπω συνεχίζεις δυνατά και κλασικά. Οι κόκκινες λάμψεις τι είναι , αντανακλαση από κάτι ;

  • The difference between AGILITY and MANEUVERABILITY in term of planes 5.2 years ago

    @HarryBen47 oh no I don't like sarcasm, what I am trying to say with this example, is that there is not define separation for the two definitions. As you very correctly said important role plays the energy state of the plane. But also there are other factors like where is your center of gravity and your center of thrust. Some times manuverability is depending from the agility of the plane and some other times it's a dynamic phenomenon related with flight. This is why you can not classify planes in these categories. Because I bevieve that agility (in your definition) it is one of the variables for manuverability.

  • The difference between AGILITY and MANEUVERABILITY in term of planes 5.2 years ago

    Wonderful, so what is the definition for the little cessna? Remember if you have enough altitude (say 3000ft) can reverse course in a very minimal cycle and almost instantaneously (3-5sec). @HarryBen47

  • The difference between AGILITY and MANEUVERABILITY in term of planes 5.2 years ago

    Ok let's see. Cessna skyhawks are not competing with any military monster jet like rafale or su27, but if you dive at 60 degrees, make a full roll to any side while you pitch up you have an impressive 180 degrees turn in your course in a few seconds. What do you call this?

  • What should build? 5.2 years ago

    Cessna turbo stationair , classic but not very usual ! Who would like to see an Iphone? It's square and ugly...

  • ERCO ERCOUPE - The living legend 5.2 years ago

    @AndrewGarrison thanks for the vote, you made a fantastic program . Keep up the good work

  • ERCO ERCOUPE - The living legend 5.2 years ago

    @ussr @sodiumchloride Thanks for the vote and the spotlight

  • Prop challenge (basic)(CLOSED) 5.2 years ago

    I am participating, hope to make the dead lines

    +1
  • TS-11 ISKRA 5.2 years ago

    Rare theme , good job

  • ERCO ERCOUPE - The living legend 5.2 years ago

    Unlisted version with Gester's light and mechanical instruments In : https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/FP4OFk/ERCO-ERCOUPE-For-personal-use#
    Same controls but with night flying capability

  • Aichi S2A Denko (Mobile) 5.2 years ago

    gears please

    +4
  • Is This Game Dead? 5.2 years ago

    I am using the site and the programm for almost half a year , so I am relative new . If you treat SP like a game then you will bored soon, but if you use it as an opportunity for applied physics and a spotlight for the noble idea of aviation it won't matter how many votes will you get. I thing that the community is changing to more realistic and educational activities witch is something really good . As example there is a new tag in forum with scientific articles (look the latest text on aircraft engines) . This community is powered from creativity and romantic relationship with aviation and these are time lasting virtues .

    +4
  • ERCO ERCOUPE - The living legend 5.2 years ago

    @Mmdben Cool , thanks for trying that

  • Engine Types: Part 3 (Types of Jet Engine) 5.2 years ago

    I keep asking my self why you write all the time that such themes are boring. Great work with correct mixture of humor