@AviownCorp You have some very good builds, I think I've upvoted a few of them. I'm not in any way implying that you're a bad builder, you're in fact one of the better ones I've seen.
@BroPlanes Look at the points as you look on money. If everyone has 2x the money, or 2x the points, they still have the same relative wealth/prestige (or whatever you want to look at it as). There are two reasons (that I can see, please point it out if I'm wrong) for that people would use this method: greed and/or ignorance.
For an example, if everyone did this, new users would never get points. The point of the "Point-system" to me is to get the good build/builders noticed, not to farm them. But do as you like, I guess...
Another thing about this that I consider very, very bad for the community is that people would upvote, to get upvoted. That's "attention-whoring" taken to the next level.
I really like building tanks, but I think that this is waaay overkill. Adding a tankgun, which hou could select caliber, bullet weight, velocity and what sound it makes would be sufficient. I know that this is an old argument, but it's simple planes, not complicated tanks.
@Thefalloutplayr It's not very hard really. I struggled a lot with getting good at the XML editing initially, but now I consider myself decent at that. It just takes a lot of patience.
@Seeras Yeah, taht would make it possible to work around the problem, the game thinks that they are further away from the rotator center than they actually are, causing the to turn around the wrong point.
@Seeras Thanks, initially I wanted to have two wing-guns, but that didn't really work out for whatever reason (I didn't agree with the game about how they should work when connected to rotators).
@Seeras Well, I'm still working on my Cromwell tracks. That will be some serious eye-candy I think. I have never ever ever done anything more annyoing or boring in SP than that.
@Seeras Thanks :) I was trying to build sometihng compeltely different as usual, but I think this turned out well, even though it feels like I rushed it a bit.
@AviownCorp You have some very good builds, I think I've upvoted a few of them. I'm not in any way implying that you're a bad builder, you're in fact one of the better ones I've seen.
@BroPlanes Look at the points as you look on money. If everyone has 2x the money, or 2x the points, they still have the same relative wealth/prestige (or whatever you want to look at it as). There are two reasons (that I can see, please point it out if I'm wrong) for that people would use this method: greed and/or ignorance.
For an example, if everyone did this, new users would never get points. The point of the "Point-system" to me is to get the good build/builders noticed, not to farm them. But do as you like, I guess...
Another thing about this that I consider very, very bad for the community is that people would upvote, to get upvoted. That's "attention-whoring" taken to the next level.
Really? Why would you do that? Upvote the builds you like, regardless of who made them. End of story.
@bjac0 That was a fast reaction! No problem, good work.
@Scottydoesthings Sorry, the wheels are new you know.
Well done!
Tank tracks would also be nice, but you have to keep in mind that the development of the main game has to come first.
I really like building tanks, but I think that this is waaay overkill. Adding a tankgun, which hou could select caliber, bullet weight, velocity and what sound it makes would be sufficient. I know that this is an old argument, but it's simple planes, not complicated tanks.
Epic work as always!
@Halfstrike Alrightm let's fix it later then.
@TehDuck I'd love to make a tank with you @Awesomeplanes Look at the pic I posted here @JacobHardy64 Nice.
@Flightsonic Hehe :)
@Thefalloutplayr Something along the lines of this:
Great job!
@TehDuck Nice!@Thefalloutplayr That would take ridiculous ammounts of time, no way. Some basic digital camo at most, even making that can be annoying.
I am thinking of this:
(K2 Black Panther)
@JetstreamAeroEngineering Either, but preferably a real one.
@Thefalloutplayr It's not very hard really. I struggled a lot with getting good at the XML editing initially, but now I consider myself decent at that. It just takes a lot of patience.
@Halfstrike Do you still want to do this?
@jsaret Yeah, I think it would be a great idea, particularly useful for wing roots.
Inverted circles (with quarter circles missing would be awesome), and an intake setting for flat fuselage would be great.
@Luke92778 Well, I judged mainly by side profile, which is a very good indication, IMO.
@bjac0 Thanks :)
@Luke92778 I think that the chassis and turret are correct in relation to each other, but that the hull should be wider and taller. Great work!
@Seeras Yeah, taht would make it possible to work around the problem, the game thinks that they are further away from the rotator center than they actually are, causing the to turn around the wrong point.
@Seeras Thanks, initially I wanted to have two wing-guns, but that didn't really work out for whatever reason (I didn't agree with the game about how they should work when connected to rotators).
@RailfanEthan Thanks :) I wish the beta parts would jsut be added to common version!
@Seeras It actually works really well besides that it's ridiculously fast and explodes if used improperly!
@Himynameiswalrus Fair enough, but why not just make a forum post about it then?
Happy birthday, but I think it's rather greedy to milk points with it.
@Seeras I finally completed this ugly SPAA :P
@Seeras Yeah I know, it's such a fat little plane :P
Really good, but since you have put so much time into it, why don't you also make a description? It makes it look a lot better :)
@FrankieB Ok, thanks, but to have to do that every time really isn't a very good solution in the long run.
@Seeras :p The part count will get really high, I estimate 1100 parts.
@QUOTEGOD Yeah, it's been quite a while. I will get this done though, sooner or later.
@Seeras You can see a teaser for it now :)
@UnknownNate Thanks :)
@Seeras Well, I'm still working on my Cromwell tracks. That will be some serious eye-candy I think. I have never ever ever done anything more annyoing or boring in SP than that.
@Seeras Yeah I know, I have gotten pretty lazy. Most of the details are copied from the Cromwell.
@Seeras Thanks :) I was trying to build sometihng compeltely different as usual, but I think this turned out well, even though it feels like I rushed it a bit.
@Jamesisnotanewb Not sure if I'll even do it, but if I decide to give any tank a serious a build soon, it's most likely going to be that.
@Jamesisnotanewb Haven't got a clue, but I have some of the basic hull shapes from earlier I believe.
@TheGuyWhoFliesToGetHisPie No problem.
@Jamesisnotanewb Right now I'm building a fictional armored car though :)
@Jamesisnotanewb Well, I've been considering the Königstiger, and if I do that I'll have th eright chassis, so perhaps.
Do 217?
@Glaceon AAA/AA/Flak/Etc is any antiaircraft gun, but I doubt that the AAA here stands for that.
@Pilotmario Thanks, it's supposed to be a BM-13N.