Of course I do @TheOwlAce arguably every hard-working user on this site has a feature-worthy build somewhere. But it's all about which ones get noticed. And for some reason, my content was noticed, and yours wasn't. I'm not saying either of our builds is better than the other, all I'm saying is that publicity and popularity are everything on this site, no matter how sad and unfair it may be.
I need you to calm down before you get into trouble, mate @TheOwlAce I don't know why your carrier didn't get as much attention as it deserved, and it's not my fault that your aircraft didn't get as many downloads or upvotes as mine did. I'm just building what I build, I'm not targeting anyone. And by the way, I didn't even know my bomber got featured, that's awesome news for me. I'm not pretending to have the best planes on this site, I'm just another user. I feel like luck and early friendships with other users are huge factors in how fast you grow, and also how often you post, and how consistent your posts are.
If I could offer some advice, it would be to add the function of the build you post right next to its name @TheOwlAce I looked at some of your stuff, and a lot of it is titled with assorted numbers and letters, which I know is probably your name system, which is great and I love it. But people don't really know what they're getting into when they see an airplane with just that name. Adding what kind of plane it is, like "Fighter" or "Bomber" or whatever so users can read what it is before even opening the page would provide more guidance and draw more downloaders in, which would draw more followers in, and maybe get you some more upvotes :)
Yeah I think I will download it then. And if I can uninstall the beta at any time, I can still release non-beta planes for the majority to fly. @kikasshes @bspboy @TempestAviation @jsaret
Thank you @TempestAviation I use them to make it easier for me to either make an interior, or to put mechanical stuff inside the plane, like rotators (usually both). Also, I just think structural panels are so fun and simple to experiment with as body pieces
That's interesting @General360 because he actually copied one of my airplanes too. I thought he cleaned up and was turning over a new leaf, but I guess not :/
hm @Upquark you just gave me an idea. For my next heavy bomber, which'll have to be even bigger than the H-36, I'll put two turrets on each of the primary wings, instead of having just one on the top of the fuselage and one on the bottom.
It's alright dude @TheOwlAce I'll follow you and be sure to keep a lookout for your content :)
Thank you! @TempestAviation
Of course I do @TheOwlAce arguably every hard-working user on this site has a feature-worthy build somewhere. But it's all about which ones get noticed. And for some reason, my content was noticed, and yours wasn't. I'm not saying either of our builds is better than the other, all I'm saying is that publicity and popularity are everything on this site, no matter how sad and unfair it may be.
I need you to calm down before you get into trouble, mate @TheOwlAce I don't know why your carrier didn't get as much attention as it deserved, and it's not my fault that your aircraft didn't get as many downloads or upvotes as mine did. I'm just building what I build, I'm not targeting anyone. And by the way, I didn't even know my bomber got featured, that's awesome news for me. I'm not pretending to have the best planes on this site, I'm just another user. I feel like luck and early friendships with other users are huge factors in how fast you grow, and also how often you post, and how consistent your posts are.
If I could offer some advice, it would be to add the function of the build you post right next to its name @TheOwlAce I looked at some of your stuff, and a lot of it is titled with assorted numbers and letters, which I know is probably your name system, which is great and I love it. But people don't really know what they're getting into when they see an airplane with just that name. Adding what kind of plane it is, like "Fighter" or "Bomber" or whatever so users can read what it is before even opening the page would provide more guidance and draw more downloaders in, which would draw more followers in, and maybe get you some more upvotes :)
I'm sorry, mate @TheOwlAce I don't really know what to say :/
Thank you all @General360 @Goblix @JacobHardy64 @Sutairs I'll try to get a better project up soon
Thank you guys. Sorry for the sub-par airplane :/ @GrimMantis @Arcues
Yeah I think I will download it then. And if I can uninstall the beta at any time, I can still release non-beta planes for the majority to fly. @kikasshes @bspboy @TempestAviation @jsaret
Thank you @Noman0rumeral :)
Point taken @Skua I have been getting more and more excited over the past month for this update
Either the prop airliner or the biplane airliner
Thank you @SarcasticCommander for your upvotes!
I'd be honored to have my airplanes featured or reviewed on you channel :)
Thank you! @CarlosDanger13
Reported for copying.
Thanks :) @OldColonel
Thank you! @GrimMantis @PlanesAndThings
Thank you @TempestAviation I use them to make it easier for me to either make an interior, or to put mechanical stuff inside the plane, like rotators (usually both). Also, I just think structural panels are so fun and simple to experiment with as body pieces
Thank you for saying that, it makes me so happy ^-^ @TempestAviation
Thank you @TempestAviation for your upvote :)
Hey, what do you need to fix it?
Thank you @LouisEP :)
lol thanks @RedFalcon but 5 seconds isn't the best for a fighter, it's just acceptable. I've got fighters that can whip around in two or three seconds
Good choice, man @General360 smart. Hopefully he'll either learn his lesson or be removed from the site
That's interesting @General360 because he actually copied one of my airplanes too. I thought he cleaned up and was turning over a new leaf, but I guess not :/
Thanks! @Gm8984
Thanks for the upvote :) @MrSilverWolf
thank you @FlyingBee
Thank you for the upvote! @Upquark
This looks so sick!
Thanks dude @FlyingBee
Thank you so much! ^-^ @General360
Jeez, you guys! Thank you for the instant upvotes! @Sutairs @ACMECo1940 @General360
Thank you @brickmaster7918 that means a lot to me, put a lot of time and tweaking into this build :) have fun!
I'm so glad you like it! :) @T800
So excited! :D
Thanks! @thankyouall
Thank you! @OldColonel
Wish I had beta so I could try it @TheOwlAce
But yeah for light bombers, like dive bombers and torpedo bombers, the bombs are best kept under the wings or fuselage @TheOwlAce
It's usually best if the bombs are kept inside the airplane to reduce drag and prevent them from being damaged in combat @TheOwlAce
Thank you! @TheOwlAce I don't usually put tail wheels on my airplanes. I don't personally see a need for them, they're just extra weight
Thank you :) @LouisEP @anmitsuya
Ohh @Glaceon just looked that up. A flying aircraft carrier would be sweet
Yeah @Upquark
? @Glaceon
So they wouldn't be able to clip the tail. @Upquark
hm @Upquark you just gave me an idea. For my next heavy bomber, which'll have to be even bigger than the H-36, I'll put two turrets on each of the primary wings, instead of having just one on the top of the fuselage and one on the bottom.
Next stop: 999k. Break SimplePlanes