@GalaxiesDontSlleep A shame considering normal engines arranged in a circular shape with longer exhaust would have looked absolutely beautiful (i tested it and can conform). Their downside is they can't be colored easily. There is always a trace of a ugly green in there (also not being able to scale the exhaust which is common across all engines). The problem with VTOL nozzle is the shape of the exhaust which makes it difficult to scale it bigger.
@Rjenteissussy mine too. Dev options are not on but it's surprisingly durable and have small crack on the screen and some tiny black spots caused by falling screen first. Haven't came into contact with water that much. And of course, the lag.
@GalaxiesDontSlleep it's not behind but right on each other. But thanks for the advice. I need it. I did get it to work at higher speeds. The problem occurs at lower speeds. Requires more fine tuning.
@GalaxiesDontSlleep you guys cooked up something I can't even begin to understand. Not crediting you would be a crime.
And I will let you know how things went once I begin testing. I always wanted my "Dagger" to be artificially stabilized but somethi
ng always didn't work. Sometimes it's pulling too many g's other times it's aggressively pitching up and down. So I went back to normal COL COM configuration. This may just be my salvation. I for some reason never thought about using PID. So if this didn't work I will have to resort to using PID. And finally, thanks for sharing the code :)
@SPsidearm magfed gun may not be ideal for an aircraft. And it needs to fit inside the aircraft'a nose. Currently, it's the default mini gun (7.62mm according to my testing).
And by the way, this code works for your aircraft. Since every aircraft is different and behaves differently in different situations, you will definitely need to modifie this code, sometimes drastically.
It seems you already made that clear. Should have read the whole thing first 😑.
I was looking forward to this. But, now that you mentioned PID, I will probably get back to canards. If nothing worked, I will just yoink this code. And of course, credit will be given where it's due.
It's made clear that making posts like this is against the site rules. You are not supposed to talk about getting blocked/ blocking players or mention them by name. For good reasons may I add.
Yeee.... He gone. The question is, what went down?
Three possibilities
1) He got banned (but why)
2) He left and deleted his account (i personally don't think so. He did tease a new car after the eliminator)
3) A bug (If it is a bug, i haven't seen anything like this before)
"Attempted coverup of incident [REDACTED] ended in a disaster....... Loose anomalies........one too many"
.
.
.
.
Also
T
The movement is so organic, I love it. I already know what the part count is going to be 😂. Wish you adde few more angles like from the ground view or from the perspective of an aircraft.
You posted it as public but don't want anyone to download?
Here's a great idea Remove it
A land helicarrier? Interesting concept. Lag will depend on it's size.
+1@GalaxiesDontSlleep ohh.
@SPsidearm sounds like a good deal.
Great doing business with you 🤝
@GalaxiesDontSlleep is that a mod?
+1@SPsidearm we will just steal i- cough cough... I mean...cash.
@GalaxiesDontSlleep but i have seen other builds doing it (in their teasers). Maybe they are using beacons.
@GalaxiesDontSlleep A shame considering normal engines arranged in a circular shape with longer exhaust would have looked absolutely beautiful (i tested it and can conform). Their downside is they can't be colored easily. There is always a trace of a ugly green in there (also not being able to scale the exhaust which is common across all engines). The problem with VTOL nozzle is the shape of the exhaust which makes it difficult to scale it bigger.
You can't change launch force of chaff.
By the way, is there any way to change exhaust scale without it looking messed up?
@cyon really? I didn't find much use for it.
@Rjenteissussy mine too. Dev options are not on but it's surprisingly durable and have small crack on the screen and some tiny black spots caused by falling screen first. Haven't came into contact with water that much. And of course, the lag.
+1A CHILD?!?, on this website?
Modes, break his neck
@Rjenteissussy 🤯
How is it holding up?
Please
I will be needing that code for g limiter.
Looks like the perfect place to show myself in uninvited.
+1Looks like he should be locked up with you.
+1Hi Australian man.
Tea ☕
@GalaxiesDontSlleep ohh. Thanks again.
+1Hang on, is this a two in one code? Limiting AOA and G's at the same time?
+1You mad man
@GalaxiesDontSlleep it's not behind but right on each other. But thanks for the advice. I need it. I did get it to work at higher speeds. The problem occurs at lower speeds. Requires more fine tuning.
+1@LunarEclipseSP thanks.
+1@SPsidearm in that case, it will be just fine.
@GalaxiesDontSlleep you guys cooked up something I can't even begin to understand. Not crediting you would be a crime.
+1And I will let you know how things went once I begin testing. I always wanted my "Dagger" to be artificially stabilized but somethi
ng always didn't work. Sometimes it's pulling too many g's other times it's aggressively pitching up and down. So I went back to normal COL COM configuration. This may just be my salvation. I for some reason never thought about using PID. So if this didn't work I will have to resort to using PID. And finally, thanks for sharing the code :)
@SPsidearm magfed gun may not be ideal for an aircraft. And it needs to fit inside the aircraft'a nose. Currently, it's the default mini gun (7.62mm according to my testing).
And by the way, this code works for your aircraft. Since every aircraft is different and behaves differently in different situations, you will definitely need to modifie this code, sometimes drastically.
+2It seems you already made that clear. Should have read the whole thing first 😑.
I was looking forward to this. But, now that you mentioned PID, I will probably get back to canards. If nothing worked, I will just yoink this code. And of course, credit will be given where it's due.
+1@SPsidearm thanks, would love to see it.
What was this game about again?
Looks cool.
You better give me that Tea☕
Do we need to fact check that statement
+1@YarisSedan i am completely expecting it to go well over 1000. 600 on the lower end.
@AWESOMENESS360 atleast 600+ ?
It's made clear that making posts like this is against the site rules. You are not supposed to talk about getting blocked/ blocking players or mention them by name. For good reasons may I add.
@Graingy that sounds...... Painful? And a bit horrifying.
@Graingy don't watch it. I totally slayed and definitely didn't fumble like a dummy.
@Graingy wait, who's getting the what surgery again?
Yeee.... He gone. The question is, what went down?
+1Three possibilities
1) He got banned (but why)
2) He left and deleted his account (i personally don't think so. He did tease a new car after the eliminator)
3) A bug (If it is a bug, i haven't seen anything like this before)
Child labor?
Now that's how you celebrate something.
+1My thoughts and prayers will probably be with her.
@RavenAerospaceIndustries no problem.
Not exactly.
The rocket needs to be at the dead center of whatever is covering it, and the detacher. Even if the mass and drag is set to zero.
You know what comes next.
@RavenAerospaceIndustries yes but, you want it to go mach 10. Some sacrifices are necessary.
+1"Attempted coverup of incident [REDACTED] ended in a disaster....... Loose anomalies........ one too many"
.
.
.
.
Also
T
The movement is so organic, I love it. I already know what the part count is going to be 😂. Wish you adde few more angles like from the ground view or from the perspective of an aircraft.
@Saturn0 that was unfortunate.
+1@Saturn0 ohhh
+1