Well compared to some of the allied tanks, they were a bit worse. But I suppose if you take into account what the Panther had over most allied vehicles it seems like a fair trade-off. Most tanks then had to tension the tracks very often, but as the German vehicles had a tendency to be very heavy and complicated, Panthers, Tigers, etc needed extra care. Also in the Russian winters, you'd have to clean mud out of the interlocking wheels VERY often in order to prevent it from freezing and jamming the wheels up @K2K
Ohhhh I see what you were saying ok. The KT’s gun was good, yeah, but I really don’t see a need, as the Panther was perfectly adequate both armor and gun. I guess if you just parked the Tiger 2 in a good defensive position you don’t need to worry about reliability xD but a chain is only as strong as its weakest link @ChrisPy
Panther wasn’t underpowered, just very unreliable. Before they were equipped with rev limiters, then could hit around 50kph, and for a 45 ton tank in the 40s, that was actually very good. And the KwK42 had a higher muzzle velocity than the 88 and with more penetration. I’d take a panther over tiger 100% of the time. The front plate of the panther was also effectively thicker. 80mm at around 50* angle @ChrisPy
The Tiger II was only really effective at defending, whereas the Panther was much faster, had totally sufficient armor, and more reliable. But if the question was asking realistically rather than 1 on 1, the T34 or M4 would win 100% @ChrisPy
In what way? Realistically or in a 1 on 1? Realistically, either the T-34 or M4 due to mass production. But 1 on 1, Panther 100%
Thicker effective armor than Tiger and better gun. Many people think the Tiger’s 88mm could penetrate more but that is false. On one occasion, a Panther SHOT THROUGH a dead M4 and killed one behind it. If Germany had somehow managed to produce the Panther on even half the scale of the T34, they would’ve most definitely held on longer
I’ve spent months cracking the code on how to make guided bombs that don’t have ANY change in speed and have ZERO smoke. I have a GBU-12 and GBU-28B on my page and they are super simple to make and use @Viper_Z3R0
Your bias is so obvious now 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 “EF2000, a rather bad European plane” IT’S ONE OF THE BEST EVER MADE WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING??? The French army is no where near the US army in the 21st century 🤣🤣🤣 surely this is satire please tell me it is @CharlesDeGaulle
Are you drunk? 😂😂😂 if Britain had still held the United States will all of her natural resources we would’ve had nuclear weapons even earlier and possibly had prevented the war almost entirely @CharlesDeGaulle
That mission story you made up makes it sound like a bigger, badder Mosquito
hahahaha @Starbound
Don’t fall for FB bs, we’ll be alright xD
Syria and Iran do be pretty sus though
...it flies to the target? @ArkRoyalTheDDhunter
Thancc @Saaad
Huh...
Mate...it genuinely looks like a real 190
This new livery looks great too
Thank jesus xD @Acepilot108
Oh wow! Nice job! From what I can see, it looks quite part efficient too!
Nice!
Dimkal did a damn good job on those bombs as usual!
Yeah heh boiiaa
Ahh. Still fabulous work. I loooove the landing gear. Very well done! @Reuben201103
I figured but it’s 2021 which means that it’s most likely possible...which is creepy as hell
New IOS devices (8-12) can handle this at 60fps like it’s cake xD @ScorpionSpace
I bet the bio is a joke...hopefully @tsampoy
Snazzy
Yup... @Basilisk
Ahh I see, thanks @asteroidbook345
Ahh, then how do I make the jelly-like suspension of a tank? @asteroidbook345
Make them tell you no
Same thing happens to me, the suspension on the tank I was building always vibrated and shook no matter what I did
💀💀💀 no way I DON’T BELIEVE YOU xD @realSavageMan
This seems like it would look very nice if you follow the plan!
Mate!! This is so cool, well done
Ahh ok. Cool! @realSavageMan
Will the released version be equipped with the weapons IN the video or on the thumbnail? Or will the thumbnail version be a linked unlisted post?
Congratulations...
Imagine the mad lads at the meeting for that:
“Oi we need a new aircraft carrier”
“Hmm, but I want a new sub!”
“Meh, lets make both - combine them”
“Wha-?”
“I said combine them”
Lockheed lol
Bombing ru- what @idk201011323
Well compared to some of the allied tanks, they were a bit worse. But I suppose if you take into account what the Panther had over most allied vehicles it seems like a fair trade-off. Most tanks then had to tension the tracks very often, but as the German vehicles had a tendency to be very heavy and complicated, Panthers, Tigers, etc needed extra care. Also in the Russian winters, you'd have to clean mud out of the interlocking wheels VERY often in order to prevent it from freezing and jamming the wheels up @K2K
I think I know who won the competition...you brought a nuke to a watergun fight
Yeah, but to be honest, we should be glad they failed xD @ChrisPy
Ohhhh I see what you were saying ok. The KT’s gun was good, yeah, but I really don’t see a need, as the Panther was perfectly adequate both armor and gun. I guess if you just parked the Tiger 2 in a good defensive position you don’t need to worry about reliability xD but a chain is only as strong as its weakest link @ChrisPy
Panther wasn’t underpowered, just very unreliable. Before they were equipped with rev limiters, then could hit around 50kph, and for a 45 ton tank in the 40s, that was actually very good. And the KwK42 had a higher muzzle velocity than the 88 and with more penetration. I’d take a panther over tiger 100% of the time. The front plate of the panther was also effectively thicker. 80mm at around 50* angle @ChrisPy
Sure @EternalDarkness
The Tiger II was only really effective at defending, whereas the Panther was much faster, had totally sufficient armor, and more reliable. But if the question was asking realistically rather than 1 on 1, the T34 or M4 would win 100% @ChrisPy
In what way? Realistically or in a 1 on 1? Realistically, either the T-34 or M4 due to mass production. But 1 on 1, Panther 100%
Thicker effective armor than Tiger and better gun. Many people think the Tiger’s 88mm could penetrate more but that is false. On one occasion, a Panther SHOT THROUGH a dead M4 and killed one behind it. If Germany had somehow managed to produce the Panther on even half the scale of the T34, they would’ve most definitely held on longer
I like democracy
I don’t see the problem here. Just appreciating the uncensored, fair, and equal democracy @EternalDarkness
Great @EternalDarkness
And flyable bombs would be pretty fun. Especially when bomb-tossing
This would be cool and much easier, but it somewhat detracts from the work of people like myself
I’ve spent months cracking the code on how to make guided bombs that don’t have ANY change in speed and have ZERO smoke. I have a GBU-12 and GBU-28B on my page and they are super simple to make and use @Viper_Z3R0
Sweet! Take your time! ;) @Dimkal
I hate to nag, but how’s the progress?
Your bias is so obvious now 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 “EF2000, a rather bad European plane” IT’S ONE OF THE BEST EVER MADE WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING??? The French army is no where near the US army in the 21st century 🤣🤣🤣 surely this is satire please tell me it is @CharlesDeGaulle
Are you drunk? 😂😂😂 if Britain had still held the United States will all of her natural resources we would’ve had nuclear weapons even earlier and possibly had prevented the war almost entirely @CharlesDeGaulle
Idk but the way he spelled it seemed like that @UltraLight