HoLy CoW mAn. It'S nOt LiKe We HaVe EyE's Or SoMeThInG. In other news water is a liquid. You don't really need to make a post about every single change. People will see it eventually.
Good job. To make this pop out even more, try adding fuselage blocks over the wings to make realistic airfoils. Also nudge one fuselage cone on the front landing gear. It will look better.
@metallicplanes it has to be symmetrical in order for me to add detail. The tank itself is symmetrical, but mirroring parts is not symmetrical to the tank. I want to add stuff to each side like historical markings. It will make it easier on me if the symmetry was fixed. When you try to mirror something, it doesn't mirror where I want it. The cockpit part has to be in the center of the craft in order for perfect symmetry and try not to scale it, that messes with the physics.
I was working on it a bat, however I can't really work on it if the symmetry is messed up. So you are going to have to fix that before I can't work on it.
@metallicplanes because so that if users don't like something, then I know to change it on other models. Also it will make you a better builder because you will know what is good and was is not.
@F104Deathtrap I do think you have to remember that strategic bombing was really an entire new concept though and the US Army Air Corps did make changes through out the war like fighter escorts and bomber formation. Though if you ask a WW2 veteran that flew in the B-17, they would probably tell you how good of a machine she was.
I don't think we need more weapons, but more customization would be cool. Make sure you put these suggestions in the user voice, located under the Stuff tab.
I just turned 3 years a couple of weeks ago! I do see the inactivity, but that is okay because the true followers will always be here. The one and done players will leave and the dedicated players will continue to play and upload.
@ACEPILOT109 I hear you.
HoLy CoW mAn. It'S nOt LiKe We HaVe EyE's Or SoMeThInG. In other news water is a liquid. You don't really need to make a post about every single change. People will see it eventually.
Couldn't of agreed more.
+1An M1A1 Abrams.
+2This thing must eat muddy roads for breakfast.
What a lovely boat you made there.
+2That's scarier than Tiger Tank.
+1You put a lot of detail into those wind turbines. I like it.
Add some markings on the side. Like numbers or symbols.
Such an edgy joke.
That's one tactical fan.
+2@Hayhayjam664 egg-cellent joke.
Good job. To make this pop out even more, try adding fuselage blocks over the wings to make realistic airfoils. Also nudge one fuselage cone on the front landing gear. It will look better.
People will come out from under their rocks once another SP update is released.
You can buy an addiction to get more points.
+1I still plan to stick around. I won't be leaving anytime soon.
+1Nice trim work. The only problem is the steering wheel is in the wrong spot. How do you expect us Murican's to be able to drive the car?
+1Space and planes. I like.
The devs said they will work on 1.8 end of this year and next year I think.
+1@metallicplanes okay thanks. When I mean by scaling it, don't change the size of the cockpit part in any way. It messes with the physics.
@metallicplanes it has to be symmetrical in order for me to add detail. The tank itself is symmetrical, but mirroring parts is not symmetrical to the tank. I want to add stuff to each side like historical markings. It will make it easier on me if the symmetry was fixed. When you try to mirror something, it doesn't mirror where I want it. The cockpit part has to be in the center of the craft in order for perfect symmetry and try not to scale it, that messes with the physics.
I was working on it a bat, however I can't really work on it if the symmetry is messed up. So you are going to have to fix that before I can't work on it.
@ForeverPie I saw that.
Here is the uservoice suggestion made a while ago.
SimpleKSP.
+2That is what the restart here button is for.
@metallicplanes cool I will start it this weekend.
Can't believe it's here. I remember back when the project was just getting started.
@metallicplanes I would have to do it later today and it may not get done until a couple of days, but I am willing to do it.
@metallicplanes because so that if users don't like something, then I know to change it on other models. Also it will make you a better builder because you will know what is good and was is not.
kewl. Nice detail.
Buy it.
+2@QingyuZhou crap.
Now I can't confuse Baconeggs and BaconAircraft.
+7I'm lovin it
+5That F4F is mint. Tag me when it's done.
@F104Deathtrap I thought your analysis was good.
@ThomasRoderick I must of misinterpreted some of your writings.
@F104Deathtrap I do think you have to remember that strategic bombing was really an entire new concept though and the US Army Air Corps did make changes through out the war like fighter escorts and bomber formation. Though if you ask a WW2 veteran that flew in the B-17, they would probably tell you how good of a machine she was.
+1I don't think we need more weapons, but more customization would be cool. Make sure you put these suggestions in the user voice, located under the Stuff tab.
I just turned 3 years a couple of weeks ago! I do see the inactivity, but that is okay because the true followers will always be here. The one and done players will leave and the dedicated players will continue to play and upload.
+2@BlackhattAircraft I figured.
+1When I first saw the plane, it looked like an FW-190 from the front.
+1Vroom Vroom
There is finally light at the end of the tunnel!
+1A huge and I mean HUGE American flag
+6The detail on this is amazing. Keep up the good work.
+17.8 out of 10. Too much water.
@UnguidedCylinder It's just a slow process due to school.
I'm building a Revell 1-48 P-47D Thunderbolt Razerback, however one of the fuselage parts has a defect in it so I have to wait for a replacement.