@legendary666 a moon space station is what NASA has explored a bit already. ISS is in LEO so it's not that far from Earth so it would be pointless to stop at the ISS.
@legendary666 SpaxeX is here to reduce the cost of a rocket launch dramatically as well as rapid reusability. There is a new space race happening between NASA and SpaceX, and probably ULA to get to Mars. @MarcosEdu We are going back to the moon to create some sort of out post to get to mars I believe. The moon is closer to Mars than the Earth is. Plus there could be further scientific discovers that could happen now that there not able to be done in the 60's and 70's.
@legendary666 well James Cameron filmed the moon landing however since he was such a perfectionist, he wanted to be as real as possible. So they went to the moon to film the moon landing so James Cameron would be satisfied.
What's so wrong about planes with more parts and are better looking than others. It sounds like you want to limit creativity. Plus I won't accept 5 minute builds and hold them to the same standard as month long build that were though out and created perfectly. 5 minute builds are those creations that slap some landing gear and some wings to a cockpit with some bombs on there for fun. That is not creativity, that's showing that the builder doesn't care. I don't mind skipping over those post.
IOS will never have mods. It's apart of Apples policy. That's out of the devs hands. As well there are hinges to make legs. You just have to get creative about your leg design. That's a huge part of SP is creativity. Plus getting shot and leaking fuel is physical damage which is a part of the game. Physical damage is part of the damage system.
Look up images on the internet and find pictures that suit your need. For example if you want to know what engine looks like on a B-17, then look up images of the engine to find out the shape and the look of the engine. Helps out a lot. Plus if you look in my Bio I have a link to a blueprint site. Check it out.
Good start. Now try to add more detail such as thicker wings, realistic landing gear and cockpit. Not bad for a first try. Possibly look up B-24's on this site or look up photos on the web to get inspiration. Good job.
Fantastic. I love the detail on this. It looks pretty much like a F9. Great job. Maybe make a F9 with fairings with a small satellite in it. That would be amazing. Fantastic job. Can't wait to see more stuff like this in the future.
Wings look too thin. Love the vertical stabilizers. That looks fantastic. The engine's are fine. The nose needs work. You are going to need add more parts to make the nose smoother. Those are my thoughts.
@MrDoolittle I agree everybody has different opinions. That's human, however solutions come about when there are civil discussions. Solutions both sides agree to. That's what I want. I'm tired of seeing people argue. All this arguing causes more drama and drama is not needed here.
Everybody just chill out. I don't care what side your on. Calm down. There is absolutely no reason to be arguing with people. We are a community. Time to act like it. Be civil with each other.
Just report the profile and be done with it. You don't need to make a post about it. The person who made the profile did that to probably draw attention to his name and to be a troll. You are giving what the troll wants and that is attention.
@F104Deathtrap " The war merely accelerated technology already under development". That's what I was saying. Sure competition as in company to company drives innovation however I'm also saying is without war some technology wouldn't have been developed. Would we have penicillin if it wasn't for war? No. Would we have radar? No. Would we have rockets. No. Would we even have computers? No. War drives innovation. War sucks but innovations that are beneficial to society. Yes there are innovations that are developed during peacetime. However those inventions are then accelerated and huge amount of research is done to make that invention better because of war. For example the jet engine. War drives innovation. Even look at the space race. Even though we weren't truly at war, it felt and was close to war. That competition drove huge innovation. All those technological innovations propelled the US to the Moon. I do like the conversation we are having.
@F104Deathtrap I was more of getting on the lines of the Me 262. Jets weren't used until WW2. People may of been developing jet engines , however they were just prototypes. With the technology developed from the Me 262 and jet blueprints, the jetliner came into existence.
@Shanethepain1 make a doge ram 4 door without a lot of parts. You don't need an engine or interior if you want that. Engines and interiors will take a lot of parts to make. Though a car without an interior will get boring after a while.
Hello and welcome. Check out the highest rated planes to find fantastic builds. Also you can search with the search bar to find any planes you want. Good luck with your adventures.
@danman12 
Nice. The color scheme is fantastic. I like the shape and the gear is modeled nicely. Keep up the good work.
Fantastic model. Love the detail and effort put into it.
@legendary666 something like that.
@legendary666 a moon space station is what NASA has explored a bit already. ISS is in LEO so it's not that far from Earth so it would be pointless to stop at the ISS.
@legendary666 SpaxeX is here to reduce the cost of a rocket launch dramatically as well as rapid reusability. There is a new space race happening between NASA and SpaceX, and probably ULA to get to Mars. @MarcosEdu We are going back to the moon to create some sort of out post to get to mars I believe. The moon is closer to Mars than the Earth is. Plus there could be further scientific discovers that could happen now that there not able to be done in the 60's and 70's.
@legendary666 money.
@legendary666 well James Cameron filmed the moon landing however since he was such a perfectionist, he wanted to be as real as possible. So they went to the moon to film the moon landing so James Cameron would be satisfied.
What's so wrong about planes with more parts and are better looking than others. It sounds like you want to limit creativity. Plus I won't accept 5 minute builds and hold them to the same standard as month long build that were though out and created perfectly. 5 minute builds are those creations that slap some landing gear and some wings to a cockpit with some bombs on there for fun. That is not creativity, that's showing that the builder doesn't care. I don't mind skipping over those post.
+1I didn't know you where the glider. Lol.
IOS will never have mods. It's apart of Apples policy. That's out of the devs hands. As well there are hinges to make legs. You just have to get creative about your leg design. That's a huge part of SP is creativity. Plus getting shot and leaking fuel is physical damage which is a part of the game. Physical damage is part of the damage system.
+1Well Fantastic. Would be cool if you put USS Enterprise NCC-1701 on the top though. Good job.
+1@jamesPLANESii thanks.
How do you get blue prints the same dimensions as the blueprints? Plus do you slide the opacty down 50% of the actual blueprint or the SP blueprint?
Good job. Though I feel you could've done more with the cockpit. This plane has the potential. I feel more detail could be added.
Look up images on the internet and find pictures that suit your need. For example if you want to know what engine looks like on a B-17, then look up images of the engine to find out the shape and the look of the engine. Helps out a lot. Plus if you look in my Bio I have a link to a blueprint site. Check it out.
2.
The fuselage and wing shape is excellent. Fantastic job. Keep up the good work.
@MrTyTheGreat Fantastic. Tag me when you get it done.
Good start. Now try to add more detail such as thicker wings, realistic landing gear and cockpit. Not bad for a first try. Possibly look up B-24's on this site or look up photos on the web to get inspiration. Good job.
Fantastic. I love the detail on this. It looks pretty much like a F9. Great job. Maybe make a F9 with fairings with a small satellite in it. That would be amazing. Fantastic job. Can't wait to see more stuff like this in the future.
@diegoavion84 Okay kewl. Looks great.
+1Looks just fine. What plane?
Wings look too thin. Love the vertical stabilizers. That looks fantastic. The engine's are fine. The nose needs work. You are going to need add more parts to make the nose smoother. Those are my thoughts.
@MrDoolittle I agree everybody has different opinions. That's human, however solutions come about when there are civil discussions. Solutions both sides agree to. That's what I want. I'm tired of seeing people argue. All this arguing causes more drama and drama is not needed here.
@jamesPLANESii Kewl. Thanks my dude.
How do you get the text in the box?
CCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLL
Everybody just chill out. I don't care what side your on. Calm down. There is absolutely no reason to be arguing with people. We are a community. Time to act like it. Be civil with each other.
+1XML Codes
That is life. People come and go. You are just going to have to find a way to deal with it.
+1Can I get a waffle. Can I please get a waffle?
Just report the profile and be done with it. You don't need to make a post about it. The person who made the profile did that to probably draw attention to his name and to be a troll. You are giving what the troll wants and that is attention.
I like the red and white.
The scale and shape is amazing. Great work.
A corner style that "basically cuts off the corner". So a circle. SP has that.
The detail on this is amazing. Probably could've lightened the color of the green a bit as it's hard to see some detail.
@F104Deathtrap are you talking about the Z1 computer as well as H2S radar? I really find your point interesting. I'm glad we had this conversation.
@F104Deathtrap " The war merely accelerated technology already under development". That's what I was saying. Sure competition as in company to company drives innovation however I'm also saying is without war some technology wouldn't have been developed. Would we have penicillin if it wasn't for war? No. Would we have radar? No. Would we have rockets. No. Would we even have computers? No. War drives innovation. War sucks but innovations that are beneficial to society. Yes there are innovations that are developed during peacetime. However those inventions are then accelerated and huge amount of research is done to make that invention better because of war. For example the jet engine. War drives innovation. Even look at the space race. Even though we weren't truly at war, it felt and was close to war. That competition drove huge innovation. All those technological innovations propelled the US to the Moon. I do like the conversation we are having.
@F104Deathtrap I was more of getting on the lines of the Me 262. Jets weren't used until WW2. People may of been developing jet engines , however they were just prototypes. With the technology developed from the Me 262 and jet blueprints, the jetliner came into existence.
I like to think of all the technological innovations that came from war. We wouldn't have jets if it wasn't for war.
+9@InternationalAircraftCompany yup.
There wouldn't be a orange streak, there would be a black or gray streak across the sky. There by a an orange glow though.
@Shanethepain1 I'm not a car builder. Plus I don't have time for SP right now. School and my Eagle project takes 110% of my time.
@Shanethepain1 make a doge ram 4 door without a lot of parts. You don't need an engine or interior if you want that. Engines and interiors will take a lot of parts to make. Though a car without an interior will get boring after a while.
Why can't you? Practice makes perfect.
I have a 1998 Ford Ranger. It's awesome. However I would love a Ford Crown Victoria. That car is sick.
Hello and welcome. Check out the highest rated planes to find fantastic builds. Also you can search with the search bar to find any planes you want. Good luck with your adventures.
@Gestour noice.
+1will there be different cockpit instrument panels?
+2uservoice it.