The elevation / azimuth is aight. But the fusing (that determines when the flak should explode, preferably next to the enemy) is unreliable and explodes too far or too short sometimes @Hellosss38
this is broken lmao. I tried to bigbrain the fusing but it didn;t work out. the funky things I have that aren't broken are the auto land rocket and the other turret
yes much of the horizontal is dulled with the built in passive retrograde pointer (automatically activating and disengaging tiny parachutes), and the engine’s formula kills out the rest once the craft is pointing retrograde. note that if you are fast forwarding the retro stabilizer may fail due to SP taking a weird physics step. technically you don’t even need the parachutes if you keep it retrograde with passive wing stabilization (like the video shows) as the engine function is able to kill it off, but I thought parachutes were easier than having the device switch from passive stabilization upwards to passive stabilization downwards. @FairFireFlight
This isn’t some random user picking out a random Platinum to cause drama. Sodium and Dixon are friends in real life so that justifies his previous post.
As for me, I was recently challenged to a chess match against Dixon. I accepted, but when the time of the match came, I did not join as I was currently busy with some else - the fault of my cowardice. Later on we would attempt the same match again and I would lose by timeout loss, but I did beat both of them through a heavy strategic victory in multiplication racer.
So it really is not a drama. Just a reminder to not cower in the face of chess. I will be back soon for a rematch.
As someone who's built and flown a couple dozen aircraft, as well as a couple RTFs, from gliders to jets, I would have preferred this to be 4ch - the dihedral of this aircraft does not stabilize it in SP and dutch roll pops up everytime I try to fly it to the extent I do in real life. Regardless, good work anyways. Next time, you should panel the wings as well to form the flat bottom shape, as I doubt they're symmetric flat wings from the picture.
Great work! please disable the drag next time though to reduce lag.
give me a sec lmao I’m not done @GuyFolk
this is the titanic 2, a space ship @DOX
baked [unrunnable] beans
+1o no
verm
if ur smart pls set the cutoff to speed
Thanks. This is very useful for my needs. Is there a support email I can contact you at for more information on this wonderful product?
+1escuela de racismo
+1Understandable
+1wtf upload
what @AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
@Habu nO
cute
muy bien
+1@banbantheman Can you not?
Get yours here
By @Locurapuntocom
nice
or maybe ask bogan for permission first :)
@APilotOfPlanes
[data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9c46/e9c463ee74d22621866ff25a33c3d0dff54868ee" alt=""](REDIRECT LINK)
thancs @Blue0Bull @BoganBoganTheWoman
i ate it but if you tag me I'll uninstall simpleplanes
The elevation / azimuth is aight. But the fusing (that determines when the flak should explode, preferably next to the enemy) is unreliable and explodes too far or too short sometimes @Hellosss38
@MrVaultech @Blue0Bull stealth comment
this is broken lmao. I tried to bigbrain the fusing but it didn;t work out. the funky things I have that aren't broken are the auto land rocket and the other turret
yes but you need to get your teaser out before these 2 fade off the front forums page @AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
yes much of the horizontal is dulled with the built in passive retrograde pointer (automatically activating and disengaging tiny parachutes), and the engine’s formula kills out the rest once the craft is pointing retrograde. note that if you are fast forwarding the retro stabilizer may fail due to SP taking a weird physics step. technically you don’t even need the parachutes if you keep it retrograde with passive wing stabilization (like the video shows) as the engine function is able to kill it off, but I thought parachutes were easier than having the device switch from passive stabilization upwards to passive stabilization downwards. @FairFireFlight
@MrVaultech wrong tag ?
@BoganBoganTheWoman make them then hmmf
@MrVaultech give unlisted and we can see.
hey when can I get an iOS version ?
Note: If you came here from SN8 the SN8 funky trees improves on this a slight bit, but they still share the same concepts of use.
Thanks to SPMC for testing.
This isn’t some random user picking out a random Platinum to cause drama. Sodium and Dixon are friends in real life so that justifies his previous post.
As for me, I was recently challenged to a chess match against Dixon. I accepted, but when the time of the match came, I did not join as I was currently busy with some else - the fault of my cowardice. Later on we would attempt the same match again and I would lose by timeout loss, but I did beat both of them through a heavy strategic victory in multiplication racer.
So it really is not a drama. Just a reminder to not cower in the face of chess. I will be back soon for a rematch.
+8no
+8T
@SuperMeteor check again, more pics
no render, I promise
in SP
uh oh
+1note: he did not eat me
rip
a
Lmao he is still going
@Mostly dw bro I got u
+1https://www.amazon.com/Swiffer-Sweeper-Starter-Cleaning-Products/dp/B07YQDH1N1/ref=sr11_sspa?dchild=1&keywords=swiffer+mop&qid=1602529594&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUExWFZJQUVYUEhTTFRYJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwNTAwODIyMlhFQ080RVY0SldFTSZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwNzQ1ODQxN1FVUFhYN1kyODE3JndpZGdldE5hbWU9c3BfYXRmJmFjdGlvbj1jbGlja1JlZGlyZWN0JmRvTm90TG9nQ2xpY2s9dHJ1ZQ==
The big brain move is to delete your account without a LEAVING forum and come back unnoticed 3 years later
+24@CRJ900Pilot
Program Files\Steam\steamapps\common\SimplePlanes
1am forum
As someone who's built and flown a couple dozen aircraft, as well as a couple RTFs, from gliders to jets, I would have preferred this to be 4ch - the dihedral of this aircraft does not stabilize it in SP and dutch roll pops up everytime I try to fly it to the extent I do in real life. Regardless, good work anyways. Next time, you should panel the wings as well to form the flat bottom shape, as I doubt they're symmetric flat wings from the picture.
zZzZzZz
we put on веямоит
@WIZARD2017 yes that would work but only with pitch, not roll. Otherwise you could use gyros in lieu of rotators to make it work on any inclination
vermont
tillman IV-2 truncation 1945
collab with sodium and dllama (?)