@AN2Felllla It's really not extensively lengthy. Rather than complaining about it and making futile attempts at mockery, I'd advise you to actually learn the vocabulary.
Problem 9.32B
Let S define the surface of a regular icosahedron centered at (0,0,0), whereby the normal of each constituent is outward facing, for the surface given, z>0 in the first octat.
For F(x,y,z)=(x+sinz, 2y+cosx, 3z+tanx), evaluate and derive the net flux over surface S for ∫ ∫ ∫T dV.
@Stinky Get rid of that profile picture. It's presence is influencing the way you talk. Perhaps if you berid of it, you'd sound less like a nonsensical baboon.
Thanks everyone. I greatly enjoyed my popcorn.
I extend my greatest gratitude for those who entertained me on this foul, miserable day. Thank you. Hands down the best popcorn I've had this year.
The Boeing CIM-10 Bomarc (IM-99 Weapon System, prior to September 1962),was a supersonic ramjet powered long-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) used during the Cold War for the air defense of North America. In addition to being the first operational long-range SAM and the first operational pulse doppler aviation radar, it was the only SAM deployed by the United States Air Force.
The operational IM-99A missiles were based horizontally in semi-hardened shelters, nicknamed "coffins". After the launch order, the shelter's roof would slide open, and the missile raised to the vertical. After the missile was supplied with fuel for the booster rocket, it would be launched by the Aerojet General LR59-AJ-13 booster. After sufficient speed was reached, the Marquardt RJ43-MA-3 ramjets would ignite and propel the missile to its cruise speed of Mach 2.8 at an altitude of 66,000 ft (20,000 m).
The Bomarc relied on the Semi-Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE), an automated control system used by NORAD for detecting, tracking and intercepting enemy bomber aircraft. SAGE allowed for remote launching of the Bomarc missiles, which were housed in a constant combat-ready basis in individual launch shelters in remote areas. At the height of the program, there were 14 Bomarc sites located in the US and two in Canada.
The Bomarc Missile Program was highly controversial in Canada. The Progressive Conservative government of Prime Minister John Diefenbaker initially agreed to deploy the missiles, and shortly thereafter controversially scrapped the Avro Arrow, a supersonic manned interceptor aircraft, arguing that the missile program made the Arrow unnecessary.
Initially, it was unclear whether the missiles would be equipped with nuclear warheads. By 1960 it became known that the missiles were to have a nuclear payload, and a debate ensued about whether Canada should accept nuclear weapons. Ultimately, the Diefenbaker government decided that the Bomarcs should not be equipped with nuclear warheads. The dispute split the Diefenbaker Cabinet, and led to the collapse of the government in 1963. The Official Opposition and Liberal Party leader Lester B. Pearson originally was against nuclear missiles, but reversed his personal position and argued in favor of accepting nuclear warheads. He won the 1963 election, largely on the basis of this issue, and his new Liberal government proceeded to accept nuclear-armed Bomarcs, with the first being deployed on 31 December 1963. When the nuclear warheads were deployed, Pearson's wife, Maryon, resigned her honorary membership in the anti-nuclear weapons group, Voice of Women.
Canadian operational deployment of the Bomarc involved the formation of two specialized Surface/Air Missile squadrons. The first to begin operations was No. 446 SAM Squadron at RCAF Station North Bay, which was the command and control center for both squadrons. With construction of the compound and related facilities completed in 1961, the squadron received its Bomarcs in 1961, without nuclear warheads. The squadron became fully operational from 31 December 1963, when the nuclear warheads arrived, until disbanding on 31 March 1972. All the warheads were stored separately and under control of Detachment 1 of the USAF 425th Munitions Maintenance Squadron. During operational service, the Bomarcs were maintained on stand-by, on a 24-hour basis, but were never fired, although the squadron test-fired the missiles at Eglin AFB, Florida on annual winter retreats.
@spefyjerbf Yep, thanks. All I wanted was a rough approximation to have the wing flex and deflect without the use of free spin rotators in the game. Like you said, 2D airfoil is nothing like a finite wing, hehe... like making the assumptions of inviscid, incompressible flow over a perfectly flat, 2d surface... At the current stage, i've yet to learn applications of doing anything besides some rough approximations. In other words, I'm in the valley of despair of the dunning kruger effect graph lol. But i guess it works, kinda. I doubt the validity even for an approximation, but like you said, good enough for sp. kek
@edensk Yeah, I'll definitely be retaking that course whenever people here decides to have a bit more sense of responsibility and not have a 4th wave. Taking fluids online was literal hell.
Idrk as I've only studied aerodynamics in my free time so you definitely possess a lot more knowledge than I do
Tbh I doubt I know any better than you, I dropped fluids 3 days before the term course drop deadline because online learning was a shitshow and a half, so my knowledge is limited. My understanding structural analysis and whatnot vastly surpasses my understanding of aerodynamic forces acting on surfaces.
I just wanted to make something that's a bit more than increase load = increase bend but I dont think i'd ultimately use it for anything as of now.
@Lazer22 Yeah of course. Its broken af. There's a bug in the last patch that doesnt recognize that you reloaded, so your loader screams "Ready to fire" repeatedly and doesnt let you fire. Regardless, its fun driving around the map, finding a concrete barrier or a rock of some sorts, and poke out 2 missiles to blast unaware plebs with.
@spefyjerbf To continue,
+1.
In high speed flows, the kinetic energy per unit mass (V^2/2), is very large which is substantial enough to strongly interact with the other properties of the flow. Since the science of energy and entropy is the thermodynamics, it is essential to study the thermodynamic aspects of gases under the conditions compressible high speed flows. A gas is considered as a collection of particles (molecules, atoms, ions, electrons etc.) that are in random motion under certain intermolecular forces. These forces vary with distances and thus influence the microscopic behavior of the gases. However, the thermodynamic aspect mainly deals with the global nature of the gases. Over wide ranges of pressures and temperatures in the compressible flow fields, it is seen that the average distance between the molecules is more than the molecular diameters (about 10-times). So, all the flow properties may be treated as macroscopic in nature. A perfect gas follows the relation of pressure, density and temperature in the form of the fundamental equation.
p = \rhoRT; R=R/M (4.1.1)
Here, M is the molecular weight of the gas, R is the gas constant that varies from gas
to gas and R (= 8314 J kg.K) is the universal gas constant.
@AN2Felllla It's really not extensively lengthy. Rather than complaining about it and making futile attempts at mockery, I'd advise you to actually learn the vocabulary.
+1Problem 9.32B
+1Let S define the surface of a regular icosahedron centered at (0,0,0), whereby the normal of each constituent is outward facing, for the surface given, z>0 in the first octat.
For F(x,y,z)=(x+sinz, 2y+cosx, 3z+tanx), evaluate and derive the net flux over surface S for ∫ ∫ ∫T dV.
i see duct tape. but may i ask, WD40 where?
+2this is unacceptable.
@Stinky Get rid of that profile picture. It's presence is influencing the way you talk. Perhaps if you berid of it, you'd sound less like a nonsensical baboon.
+15tofu
@Ruvien0Republic0Officer blame autocorrect.
Thanks everyone. I greatly enjoyed my popcorn.
+16I extend my greatest gratitude for those who entertained me on this foul, miserable day. Thank you. Hands down the best popcorn I've had this year.
mmmmm tofu
You can (not) have 60fps.
+8@asteroidbook345 my brain is also smoother.
@SCP1471 Touché...
@BaconEggs yes
@ChrisPy Oh no. This one's getting finished. 100 parts on the dot.
@Davaskonaviatornewacc Can confirm, he stole it from the SD card hidden under my eyelid. You should write a movie script of such true crime.
+3@Stinky Its been 840 days. Suck it up and move on.
+1@Stinky Bruh... Imagine still being salty 840 days later....
+3haus
+1tail looks like ass
+=1
oogabooga where throw and catch
Damn! That's pretty cool!
+1@AN2Felllla no no, just a crappy teaser
The Boeing CIM-10 Bomarc (IM-99 Weapon System, prior to September 1962),was a supersonic ramjet powered long-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) used during the Cold War for the air defense of North America. In addition to being the first operational long-range SAM and the first operational pulse doppler aviation radar, it was the only SAM deployed by the United States Air Force.
The operational IM-99A missiles were based horizontally in semi-hardened shelters, nicknamed "coffins". After the launch order, the shelter's roof would slide open, and the missile raised to the vertical. After the missile was supplied with fuel for the booster rocket, it would be launched by the Aerojet General LR59-AJ-13 booster. After sufficient speed was reached, the Marquardt RJ43-MA-3 ramjets would ignite and propel the missile to its cruise speed of Mach 2.8 at an altitude of 66,000 ft (20,000 m).
The Bomarc relied on the Semi-Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE), an automated control system used by NORAD for detecting, tracking and intercepting enemy bomber aircraft. SAGE allowed for remote launching of the Bomarc missiles, which were housed in a constant combat-ready basis in individual launch shelters in remote areas. At the height of the program, there were 14 Bomarc sites located in the US and two in Canada.
The Bomarc Missile Program was highly controversial in Canada. The Progressive Conservative government of Prime Minister John Diefenbaker initially agreed to deploy the missiles, and shortly thereafter controversially scrapped the Avro Arrow, a supersonic manned interceptor aircraft, arguing that the missile program made the Arrow unnecessary.
Initially, it was unclear whether the missiles would be equipped with nuclear warheads. By 1960 it became known that the missiles were to have a nuclear payload, and a debate ensued about whether Canada should accept nuclear weapons. Ultimately, the Diefenbaker government decided that the Bomarcs should not be equipped with nuclear warheads. The dispute split the Diefenbaker Cabinet, and led to the collapse of the government in 1963. The Official Opposition and Liberal Party leader Lester B. Pearson originally was against nuclear missiles, but reversed his personal position and argued in favor of accepting nuclear warheads. He won the 1963 election, largely on the basis of this issue, and his new Liberal government proceeded to accept nuclear-armed Bomarcs, with the first being deployed on 31 December 1963. When the nuclear warheads were deployed, Pearson's wife, Maryon, resigned her honorary membership in the anti-nuclear weapons group, Voice of Women.
Canadian operational deployment of the Bomarc involved the formation of two specialized Surface/Air Missile squadrons. The first to begin operations was No. 446 SAM Squadron at RCAF Station North Bay, which was the command and control center for both squadrons. With construction of the compound and related facilities completed in 1961, the squadron received its Bomarcs in 1961, without nuclear warheads. The squadron became fully operational from 31 December 1963, when the nuclear warheads arrived, until disbanding on 31 March 1972. All the warheads were stored separately and under control of Detachment 1 of the USAF 425th Munitions Maintenance Squadron. During operational service, the Bomarcs were maintained on stand-by, on a 24-hour basis, but were never fired, although the squadron test-fired the missiles at Eglin AFB, Florida on annual winter retreats.
+6@spefyjerbf Yep, thanks. All I wanted was a rough approximation to have the wing flex and deflect without the use of free spin rotators in the game. Like you said, 2D airfoil is nothing like a finite wing, hehe... like making the assumptions of inviscid, incompressible flow over a perfectly flat, 2d surface... At the current stage, i've yet to learn applications of doing anything besides some rough approximations. In other words, I'm in the valley of despair of the dunning kruger effect graph lol. But i guess it works, kinda. I doubt the validity even for an approximation, but like you said, good enough for sp. kek
@edensk Yeah, I'll definitely be retaking that course whenever people here decides to have a bit more sense of responsibility and not have a 4th wave. Taking fluids online was literal hell.
+1@edensk
Tbh I doubt I know any better than you, I dropped fluids 3 days before the term course drop deadline because online learning was a shitshow and a half, so my knowledge is limited. My understanding structural analysis and whatnot vastly surpasses my understanding of aerodynamic forces acting on surfaces.
I just wanted to make something that's a bit more than increase load = increase bend but I dont think i'd ultimately use it for anything as of now.
@asteroidbook345 i can host it. i chose not to.
Too dangerous to be kept alive
ur welcome
+1fresh avocado
chonk
+2hajime isayama dies
+1@Ian_Yashima b
+1Its wednesday m'dudes
+4@asteroidbook345 soon (tm) was not intended at you. )) shh
Союз нерушимый республик свободных
Сплотила навеки Великая Русь.
Да здравствует созданный волей народов
Единый, могучий Советский Союз!
soon (tm)
Music gave me flashbacks from squeaky 2012 days. Bravo.
+5b
+1@Vincent_ chong chong mother fokker dr1
s t e a m i n g h e a p o f g a r b a g e
Onion coupon
+1yes yes
@Lazer22 Yeah of course. Its broken af. There's a bug in the last patch that doesnt recognize that you reloaded, so your loader screams "Ready to fire" repeatedly and doesnt let you fire. Regardless, its fun driving around the map, finding a concrete barrier or a rock of some sorts, and poke out 2 missiles to blast unaware plebs with.
+1You're still here. Shoo.
Go fly Drakens.
this thing is fun af in war thunder lmao
+4Bob semple
You may not like it, but this is what peak aeronautical engineering looks like.
+3Instructions too vague, lacks specificity, form and function. Paneled 480-part smooth tapered part tube instead.
+2got garbage
+1@ArkRoyalTheDDhunter N̶A̷N̶I̴?̸!̴