you realize you basically just called yourself unintelligent by asking me 4 help right? lmao
Nah srry just look at the nature of the links in ur posts and then the default pics in ur post
@RandomUser09
omg its someone on the internet actually admitting they were wrong this is such a weird feeling lol. kudos for being reasonable. like actually this is rare.
@EngineerOtaku @asteroidbook345
most ppls fictional builds exist outside the laws of physics and they make it a superplane. Superplanes are boring everyone can do it but if you can do fictional builds which have realistic limits on them they are cool and good. If you do fictional builds you should look at other planes from the timeframe and pick different characteristics from each one that you find interesting and practical. When I see most ppls builds they have something on there that doesn't make much sense is impractical for the time period or something that doesn't really work. @asteroidbook345 @FairFireFlight @Technodium
looks good and easily wins the competition but the flight models is lackluster. She turns way too slow a Su-25 can pull 5 gs safely with not much difficulty in a level turn the most im getting rn is around 2.8 the turn rate of the SU-25 is 16-17 degrees per second im getting 8 max with the maximum turn performance parameters. It also lacks the armament synonymous with the SU-25 the S-25Ls I believe you are also missing a hardpoint for R-73s. It also would have been cool to maybe see SPPU-22s on here. Looks good but that's abt it. sorry for the harsh review this time but i think some more research would have greatly helped you
if you are doing this make the buoyancy parameter something that is more stable. you could prob just keep the default codes for that tbh. i love the ocean mod but its hard to work with sometimes
@RandomUser09 i was trying to be more humorous but ok
@RandomUser09 welp thats fun
@RandomUser09 lol im messing
you realize you basically just called yourself unintelligent by asking me 4 help right? lmao
Nah srry just look at the nature of the links in ur posts and then the default pics in ur post
@RandomUser09
wut lmao@RandomUser09
cool
you can get supersonic sometimes if you have 2 contra rotating props
fun.
you could launch it to an altitude but you would prob need a camera for that @ACEPILOT109
u should make the X-15 and just put a rocket motor on the back you might actually be able to get it supersonic
arrested by FSB
dude when u gonna finish this
Just do what I do, slack off on building anything for months and then pop back in every now and then lol
sonic booms 😂 @XAircraftManufacturer
thats impossible 😂@XAircraftManufacturer
so the supersonic aircraft has to be quiet riiiigggggghhhhhttt
k lol @Souka
so probably the first page and a half of airplanes
@Souka f word yeah lmao ill start tomorrow on it im only gonna judge ones i think are actually worthy of grading
kuul bro
hi babe @SneakySniper
i understand i actually didnt know that abt the sm variant i mostly work with the t model @asteroidbook345
this is actually rlly cool very original ideas in this i love it! although a large jet bomber/fighter having 1:1 thrust isnt very realistic
lol jkjkjkjkjkjk
ok where do u live...
omg its someone on the internet actually admitting they were wrong this is such a weird feeling lol. kudos for being reasonable. like actually this is rare.
@EngineerOtaku @asteroidbook345
very plausible design and it looks great i love it
omg tag me
most ppls fictional builds exist outside the laws of physics and they make it a superplane. Superplanes are boring everyone can do it but if you can do fictional builds which have realistic limits on them they are cool and good. If you do fictional builds you should look at other planes from the timeframe and pick different characteristics from each one that you find interesting and practical. When I see most ppls builds they have something on there that doesn't make much sense is impractical for the time period or something that doesn't really work. @asteroidbook345 @FairFireFlight @Technodium
looks good and easily wins the competition but the flight models is lackluster. She turns way too slow a Su-25 can pull 5 gs safely with not much difficulty in a level turn the most im getting rn is around 2.8 the turn rate of the SU-25 is 16-17 degrees per second im getting 8 max with the maximum turn performance parameters. It also lacks the armament synonymous with the SU-25 the S-25Ls I believe you are also missing a hardpoint for R-73s. It also would have been cool to maybe see SPPU-22s on here. Looks good but that's abt it. sorry for the harsh review this time but i think some more research would have greatly helped you
nice E-3 btw
@MinWiii stop getting mad abt ios mods lol i play half the time on IOS so i get what ur talking abt but he can't do anything abt that.
if you are doing this make the buoyancy parameter something that is more stable. you could prob just keep the default codes for that tbh. i love the ocean mod but its hard to work with sometimes
pretty much impossible for anyone to download but the detail alone deserves a spotlight
Mom can i have an a-10
no we have an a-10 at home
a-10 at home:
su-25T
lol @MrSilverWolf
lol
ik ik lol @SimplyPlain
the original brrt
@Site I agree with you on the livery
nice
kool
BONX
Monkë
Low key thought this was part of ur cursed series lmao when i saw saab and b-17 in the same name
Yall need to get used to sarcasm lol
Nah i waznt. Just feels different from dcs so it might just be a variant thing@edensk
Ahahahahah yall thought i was serious? Hahahahahaha! Nah man its really good @realSavageMan @MrGreen
Bad quality and very ugly @realSavageMan
Uggo