This is not so cool ” @KnightOfRen's plane is much better than this. You don't even deserve gold barely posting. Wanna talk about low effort? You've barely posted m8.”
Hypocrisy looks bad man.
@ChrisETH
People are free to express their opinions. You may think that something is good, but many of those example builds you pointed out are pretty average. I also believe that Toxic’s builds are far better than Knights. In the specific example you pointed out, the craftsmanship in the wings alone is superior in every way to Knights, but maybe ur trying to bait us. If anything it’s ironic your attacking Toxic at the end, when you yourself literally said that we should support each other.... hypocrisy much?
@ChrisETH
If someone tells you your planes are bad, there’s obviously a reason. If you had some desire to improve, u would ask them why. Perfection is impossible obviously, but I know that your planes have so much room for improvement. @KnightOfRen
I think as time goes on, eventually no matter how good or bad you are, if you keep posting you will get to platinum regardless of the quality of your builds. However, lately I feel that there has been a feeling of resentment, that criticism is frowned upon, that “people will play the game how they like”. I know that Bogdan receives a lot of backlash for what is in a lot of cases very accurate feedback. If we want to maintain a decent standard in this community, and we should, then we need to provide feedback that is honest and real, not fluffy and sugarcoated.
They probably make up like 1000ish parts, I dunno if that's any better for you. Plus I cannot really be bothered going back and removing parts, its not exactly fun. @UWUSEMPIE
Just on that last note about successor points, you cannot get successor points for your own successors, it has to be from another user. But you can make your own successor of another users successor, and receive 1/4 of the points the new successor gets
If you are aiming for Plat or some point milestone, you’ll actually need to upload on a fairly regular basis. While quality is great, and getting builds with +100 upvotes every few months or so is nice, ur more likely to achieve such a goal with builds every week or so that get 30-40 upvotes. This is not my preferred method of building, but it is what many other users who achieve plat quickly do. Here, quantity and quality are equally important.
I’m actually super proud of the hull, especially the bottom half. When I smoothed it out it looked pretty much seamless. Maybe the top half could’ve been built differently to take advantage of the smoothing but that was before it was ever a thing, @Zanedavid
I might take a look at the H-45, but its so massive I’m not sure if I will be able to build and run it properly. I’ve also seen your H-44, very nice build. @RussianAce
Well that’s not exactly a reliable source, I don’t think u get points for comment upvotes, pretty sure that was stated in the original post where they introduced the feature. @tsampoy
Yeah many others have already pointed out some of the potential issues. While on the surface it seems like a decent idea, I mean I do think the divide and the learning is quite steep especially if you’re going through it alone, having an ambiguous ’advanced mode’ seems like it may act as another barrier to entry for beginners.
.
I remember when I first downloaded the game and I thought that the only way to build crafts was with those terrible premade block pieces. That was before I downloaded a craft and realised that most people actually built with fuselage blocks (which I had assumed to just be round cylinders that could not be edited). I feel an advanced mode would just confuse beginners more, and kinda deter them away.
.
Instead I think that the in game tutorial isn’t enough, it barely teaches you anything substantial. However I’m not too sure how willing the devs would be to commit to adding a better tutorial in SP, but perhaps for SP2 in future.
You cannot, I set up a tracking camera on the Missouri to track the 3 jets at the end. The scenes with the F-4 are done separately in a different take. @Star737
I mean, it took me years before I realised there was a realtime reflections setting, and while it absolutely kills performance, it makes the game look pretty damn hot sometimes
It’s out, check my bio for the link
@Bubbatrain6
I barely post, but that doesn’t necessarily mean I don’t put in effort. That’s not a good assumption to make. @ChrisETH
+1I respect that, everyone does have different opinions. @ChrisETH
This is not so cool
+2” @KnightOfRen's plane is much better than this. You don't even deserve gold barely posting. Wanna talk about low effort? You've barely posted m8.”
Hypocrisy looks bad man.
@ChrisETH
People are free to express their opinions. You may think that something is good, but many of those example builds you pointed out are pretty average. I also believe that Toxic’s builds are far better than Knights. In the specific example you pointed out, the craftsmanship in the wings alone is superior in every way to Knights, but maybe ur trying to bait us. If anything it’s ironic your attacking Toxic at the end, when you yourself literally said that we should support each other.... hypocrisy much?
+3@ChrisETH
Haha thank you. But this build would need a complete revamp if I wanted to make it again. Very outdated build style and techniques. @KnightOfRen
If someone tells you your planes are bad, there’s obviously a reason. If you had some desire to improve, u would ask them why. Perfection is impossible obviously, but I know that your planes have so much room for improvement. @KnightOfRen
+5I think as time goes on, eventually no matter how good or bad you are, if you keep posting you will get to platinum regardless of the quality of your builds. However, lately I feel that there has been a feeling of resentment, that criticism is frowned upon, that “people will play the game how they like”. I know that Bogdan receives a lot of backlash for what is in a lot of cases very accurate feedback. If we want to maintain a decent standard in this community, and we should, then we need to provide feedback that is honest and real, not fluffy and sugarcoated.
+9Only for the AA flak and CIWS, the main guns need to be manually aimed @Star737
You can reupload it, but the landing gear did work fine so not sure if it’s a significant change @Notrjmm
The landing gear only works on High Physics, the suspension acts funny on lower physics, especially on mobile. @Notrjmm
nah this isn’t just real-time reflections, this is something better @jamesPLANESii
+6Looking great, look forward to seeing more
Is it April already??
+17Maybe, but I cannot promise anything
@Queazyairplane16
Damn, wish I had that on my USS MIssouri. Looks great though, very nice work!
+3Maybe, but blenders a bit of a different beast. Would allow for much more flexibility though. @TastyTanks
Thanks for the spotlight! @Marine
+1Thats fine, unlisted builds don't effect me so all good
@AerospaceGeek
They probably make up like 1000ish parts, I dunno if that's any better for you. Plus I cannot really be bothered going back and removing parts, its not exactly fun. @UWUSEMPIE
Nice man, I'd love to see her at some stage in the future @Pilotmario
Just on that last note about successor points, you cannot get successor points for your own successors, it has to be from another user. But you can make your own successor of another users successor, and receive 1/4 of the points the new successor gets
If you are aiming for Plat or some point milestone, you’ll actually need to upload on a fairly regular basis. While quality is great, and getting builds with +100 upvotes every few months or so is nice, ur more likely to achieve such a goal with builds every week or so that get 30-40 upvotes. This is not my preferred method of building, but it is what many other users who achieve plat quickly do. Here, quantity and quality are equally important.
+3Thanks for the spotlight! @WIZARD2017
Hmm, you’d be right. It’s not really my sort of thing, I just like having interiors and details @Misterhmar
I’m actually super proud of the hull, especially the bottom half. When I smoothed it out it looked pretty much seamless. Maybe the top half could’ve been built differently to take advantage of the smoothing but that was before it was ever a thing, @Zanedavid
Thanks very much, glad that you both like it!
@KerlonceauxIndustries @Blue0Bull
Thank you, she’s a great ship to have a model of
@CharlesDeGaulle
I might take a look at the H-45, but its so massive I’m not sure if I will be able to build and run it properly. I’ve also seen your H-44, very nice build. @RussianAce
+1Thanks very much @EternalDarkness!
Geez 600m long lol and 90m wide, what is that behemoth ahahah!
+4@RussianAce
@WarHawk95 Yeah it is, give or take like a foot
@Feanor
+1Thanks for the spotlight!
True, but I think this is ok, and it keeps the comments less cluttered @BMilan
See below:
Link to Ship
.
@PeePeePoo_Poo @Zoomzoom999
See below:
Link to Ship
.
@KnightOfRen @Grandma @tsampoy
I think its better if I tag you with the link, given the recent tagging changes, Link to Ship
.
@Someterribleuser @BMilan @Zanedavid
Yeah but I’m talking like multiple successors, like points you get for successors of successors etc
@UtsuhoReiuji
Could be successor points, I could be wrong though
@UtsuhoReiuji
Well that’s not exactly a reliable source, I don’t think u get points for comment upvotes, pretty sure that was stated in the original post where they introduced the feature. @tsampoy
Who confirmed it?
@tsampoy
Do comments give points, I feel like they don’t
Yeah many others have already pointed out some of the potential issues. While on the surface it seems like a decent idea, I mean I do think the divide and the learning is quite steep especially if you’re going through it alone, having an ambiguous ’advanced mode’ seems like it may act as another barrier to entry for beginners.
+6.
I remember when I first downloaded the game and I thought that the only way to build crafts was with those terrible premade block pieces. That was before I downloaded a craft and realised that most people actually built with fuselage blocks (which I had assumed to just be round cylinders that could not be edited). I feel an advanced mode would just confuse beginners more, and kinda deter them away.
.
Instead I think that the in game tutorial isn’t enough, it barely teaches you anything substantial. However I’m not too sure how willing the devs would be to commit to adding a better tutorial in SP, but perhaps for SP2 in future.
You cannot, I set up a tracking camera on the Missouri to track the 3 jets at the end. The scenes with the F-4 are done separately in a different take. @Star737
No
+2I mean, it took me years before I realised there was a realtime reflections setting, and while it absolutely kills performance, it makes the game look pretty damn hot sometimes
Around 3500 @AerospaceGeek
Nice, it’s good that someone will be able to fully enjoy this beauty @Daylight
Yea you would lol, it’s at 3500 parts and I very much doubt anything would be left by the time I got rid of 2500 parts. @KnightOfRen
It’s actually war thunder with SP skins @EDEN971