Good evening and welcome back. Can I be linked to an unlisted post of the scaled down crusader tank that you made? I don't have access to Fine-Tuner at the moment so I can't do it myself.
@HellRaiser
That still does not neglect the fact that your airforce lacks any air to air aircraft. Prop-attackers are economic and effective but their capability rarely exceeds CAS or light ECM. I am currently developing several advanced aircraft models that I am willing to share with you under our Military Pact.
@Blue0Bull
Seeing how something works and then creating his own version of it.
I would say it's a bit further from stealing but that's up to you to decide.
In relation to my previous message I will abstain from participating any more discussions for tonight.
@Blue0Bull
RussianAS was the first to comment on this issue therefore, he decided to make this post upon the creators request that we stop commenting on his post.
@DeezDucks
The argument is not about upvotes, I am absolutely fine with the number of upvotes it has. The real argument is whether it is deserving of a feature and if it is morally right for the moderators to feature user 3 consecutive times.
@Blue0Bull
I'm going to have to stop you right there as this will stem into a completely new debate entirely but I will link you to a few remarkable crafts he has made
@ChiChiWerx
It is all matter of perspective. You will not understand this because you have collected a couple of features yourself, and it was because they were feature-worthy crafts. They took time and dedication to make. But when multiple low part and low detail aircraft get featured consectutively then it will be a natural order for some of us to complain.
@ChiChiWerx
I would have let it slide if it was just one. Now that this user has been featured literally 3 times in a row, It's time to give someone else a chance. As @DrukenRaider said, this user really is not improving, for there is no variation in his designs. Then why do the mods keep featuring him? I apologize if we are being rude to him, but as the creator, he needs to be aware of this problem.
@CharlesAircraftFactory
@PINK
[text](put link here)
@Abhishek700
Thank you my friend!
@ColonelStriker
Thank you!
@marcox43
Thank you!
@SakuraSaku
@jamesPLANESii
@grizzlitn
Thank you!
@CarbonFox1
Thank you. If I recall, you also made one of these, right?
@ThePrototype
@SodiumChloride
@PINK
Thank you!
@T8flightcrafts
Thank you!
@hopotumon
Thank you, and yes I was gone for a while
@CustomAircraftMods
Yeah. If there are any performance issues, please fix them.
@CustomAircraftMods
Make it look cooler
this
Good evening and welcome back. Can I be linked to an unlisted post of the scaled down crusader tank that you made? I don't have access to Fine-Tuner at the moment so I can't do it myself.
@HellRaiser
That still does not neglect the fact that your airforce lacks any air to air aircraft. Prop-attackers are economic and effective but their capability rarely exceeds CAS or light ECM. I am currently developing several advanced aircraft models that I am willing to share with you under our Military Pact.
@HellRaiser And I would highly recommend a transfer of airforce technology unless you are keen on fighting modern wars with World War 2 aircraft.
@HellRaiser To be quite honest the only desirable tank I see in your inventory is the T74A
@HellRaiser not for long
@HellRaiser
@HellRaiser
I accept! I will tag you to a few of my Tank models.
@SPCWorkshops Greetings, old friend
Is it a Su-30?
@Blue0Bull
Seeing how something works and then creating his own version of it.
I would say it's a bit further from stealing but that's up to you to decide.
In relation to my previous message I will abstain from participating any more discussions for tonight.
@DrunkenRaider
And users who always maintain a steady stream of upvotes will do nothing to improve their builds as they don't see the need to.
@Blue0Bull
RussianAS was the first to comment on this issue therefore, he decided to make this post upon the creators request that we stop commenting on his post.
@DeezDucks
The argument is not about upvotes, I am absolutely fine with the number of upvotes it has. The real argument is whether it is deserving of a feature and if it is morally right for the moderators to feature user 3 consecutive times.
@Blue0Bull
I'm going to have to stop you right there as this will stem into a completely new debate entirely but I will link you to a few remarkable crafts he has made
@ChiChiWerx
It is all matter of perspective. You will not understand this because you have collected a couple of features yourself, and it was because they were feature-worthy crafts. They took time and dedication to make. But when multiple low part and low detail aircraft get featured consectutively then it will be a natural order for some of us to complain.
@ChiChiWerx
I would have let it slide if it was just one. Now that this user has been featured literally 3 times in a row, It's time to give someone else a chance. As @DrukenRaider said, this user really is not improving, for there is no variation in his designs. Then why do the mods keep featuring him? I apologize if we are being rude to him, but as the creator, he needs to be aware of this problem.
Where's the ship weapons pack?
Underrated Sauropod
@SuperSix yes
@exosuit no and that is why this RP is good.
@CptJacobson @DankDorito
Thanks! Good to have allies.
@cptjacobson
@Strikefighter04
Not necessary to cover the wings but if you do, make the blocks weightless.
good design
you have acquired yellow fever.
n o t
f o r
l o n g
@Sinacraft
iriaf legacy lives on.
@Bluerobot11
I just made something cooler
BUILD REQUEST: a post with lots of ship weapons to help users to build modern ships.
Nice you should see my heli
@ACEPILOT109 @Iron17
@Aarons123 @CharlesAircraftFactory
@AverroesIndustries @Mikoyanster
@randomeusername @Rub3n213 @JohnnyBoythePilot
@Aeromen
Still very powerful
w h e r e i s t h e c o c k p i t?