@SavageMan lol, it was a joke, but what I generally do for autoroll is to eliminate all the mass and drag using a python script and re-add it to the centre-line of the plane.
Cool stuff. Screenshot quality is 10/10, it's beyond 8k. The only gripes I have are with the bottom section of the hull, the paneling is a li'l shabby and you've got holes the size of people in there.
I dunno, 15 upvotes for this isn't high in 2020. In 2016/17? Sure, that'd be a big deal, but not anymore.
Now, if I may address your post, the fact that you constantly need to self-depreciate out of fear of backlash is actually saddening. Speak your mind. You don't need to say "I know the entirety of SP is gonna hate me" or "I should be burnt in a pile of ash." The people who will hate you are salty 9-year-olds who want to be toxic for the sake of being toxic. This is an open platform and you can speak your mind out.
Usually in SP, upvote count is almost always directly correlated with the quality of the build.
@KnightOfRen ImaCat, to be certain, but I forgot to tag him.
@ImaCat trying won't work if you're trying the wrong things. It's like saying, "I'm constantly trying to beat this iron ball down into a sheet, but it's not working". You first gotta heat it up and then use a power-press.
Similarly, you need to learn the right techniques. Download planes made by high-level players EternalDarkness, Hedero, BogdanX, etc. I can't name all of them here, but I'm sure you'll find them.
As for your thumbnails, they're far from appealing. Have a look at this.
@BuiltBionixInd10 probably cuz you were an idiot. Wait, no, you were an idiot.
Oh no, the worms are back.
+1Yes.
Pinochet.
@PointlessWhyShouldYou Riiiiight.
@PointlessWhyShouldYou Just tell everyone that you're @Planeacceleration, everybody knows already.
+1@SavageMan lol, it was a joke, but what I generally do for autoroll is to eliminate all the mass and drag using a python script and re-add it to the centre-line of the plane.
Wait, so I don't need to use 200 gyroscopes?
+3Do it.
T h a n k @Kenneth_
what
Cool, but I don't remember asking to be tagged.
+3@dTitanplanesb The Fi-103R is the manned version. The Fi-103 is the unmanned version.
@dTitanplanesb I used custom weapons and the wolf symbol on the tail, that's why it probably ended up being more than double the OG amount.
Haha, I haven't figured out that bit yet either. Thank you so much for the all the upvotes, I really appreciate it, @dTitanplanesb.
Good stuff lad.
@Someterribleuser it's a real concept.
Follow this format
![](image-link)
@M7MD_E04
This thing is bloody amazing, I laughed my arse off. 11/10. Thanks for improving a day I would've otherwise rued.
You spent 200 years on this. GG, you've finally uploaded it.
Naw, y'all lied. Smh.
Double comments?
SP is not life. Remember that. If you feel it's taking up a majority of your time, stop playing it entirely. It'll be good for your mental health.
Cool stuff. Screenshot quality is 10/10, it's beyond 8k. The only gripes I have are with the bottom section of the hull, the paneling is a li'l shabby and you've got holes the size of people in there.
+2The website is going through a pubescent/mid-life crisis at this point in time.
+15I dunno, 15 upvotes for this isn't high in 2020. In 2016/17? Sure, that'd be a big deal, but not anymore.
Now, if I may address your post, the fact that you constantly need to self-depreciate out of fear of backlash is actually saddening. Speak your mind. You don't need to say "I know the entirety of SP is gonna hate me" or "I should be burnt in a pile of ash." The people who will hate you are salty 9-year-olds who want to be toxic for the sake of being toxic. This is an open platform and you can speak your mind out.
No, that is not the case.
Good Quality build with low upvote count 1
Good Quality build with low upvote count 2
Good Quality build with low upvote count 3
Bad Quality build with high upvote count 1
Bad Quality build with high upvote count 2
Bad Quality build with high upvote count 3
Just my two cents. If anyone has a problem with it, lemme know. I mean no disrespect to any of the creators or the builds I've linked.
+3No. This is cursed.
+1@Sadboye12 Np xd
+1@Uncel I'm male, thanks.
@Uncel there is zero necessity to advertise your post here.
When's the exact due date, if I may ask? I'm building a Delta Wing aircraft, but just stumbled upon this challenge.
Humble Bundle doesn't use Steam, go for that.
@ImaCat Blueprint settings. You'll figure it out. Idk, I use designer suite, so, never really bothered using the integrated blueprint settings.
DylaN unfollowed. I am hurt you didn't include me :'(
Please insert a thumbnail or a pic, cba to click on links to see how it looks.
@ImaCat 1.10 enables players to upload with blueprints. Just nudge the blueprint away from the plane, slap on a thumbnail, take a screenshot, upload.
@KnightOfRen ImaCat, to be certain, but I forgot to tag him.
@ImaCat trying won't work if you're trying the wrong things. It's like saying, "I'm constantly trying to beat this iron ball down into a sheet, but it's not working". You first gotta heat it up and then use a power-press.
Similarly, you need to learn the right techniques. Download planes made by high-level players EternalDarkness, Hedero, BogdanX, etc. I can't name all of them here, but I'm sure you'll find them.
As for your thumbnails, they're far from appealing. Have a look at this.
All the best to you.
No, you need to post less but improve the quality of your posts and thumbnails.
+6@Brields95 not a single functioning variant was built, how exactly did you see a non-existent aircraft test fly? Please enlighten us.
SimplePlanes, 12-bit edition.
+2Well, you're silver anyway, so congratulations.
Could you remove the Techno vs Dream spoiler in the desc and from the comments? It'd be pretty pissing off for people who didn't watch it.
@realluochen9999 No problems!
@NightmareCorporation the changelog literally says that you can now have custom thumbnails on Android and iOS. Please read the whole thing, mate.
+1Thank you for the cool features, N i c k y.
@Voskhod I'm aware.
@F104Deathtrap that works. If you wanna revamp older builds though, it'll take a while.
+1@F104Deathtrap Front-to-back only, sadly. It also has a very irritating UI which means you need to manually edit every single fuselage part.
+1@Sadboye12 Anytime, good sir. Anytime. This could use with a little smoothening from the beta update though, I'd like to see the result.
+1@LucasNicky throw in a \ before every underscore.