The key difference between SEAD and DEAD is the intent, not the outcome. While SEAD only seeks to make the enemy think twice about using air defences, DEAD missions are focused on the total destruction.
You can SEAD without DEAD but when you SEAD you can also DEAD. Basically how it goes.
@Jim1the1Squid It's an LHD, a Landing Helicopter Dock. Key differences between the two are vague.
@Jim1the1Squid LPH as in Landing Platform Helicopter?
@lancelot3340 IDF?
@HarryBen47 That's a very flattering comment, thank you.
@Gauss @communisticbanana @KerlonceauxIndustries Thanks.
+1@Viper3000ad Yeah, the weapons are mine too. Thanks.
Yeet, first upvote
@AdlerSteiner slopes everywhere
+1@DeidaraEnterprises I am Dio after all
Thanks fam
+1@exosuit lol, the tank family tree expands
@Aeromen aha, my apologies and many thanks.
@Roswell thanks
@Pilotmario is Vicky proud of her little sister?
@CptJacobson Thanks.
@harits Thanks
@exosuit fun sized vicky
+1@DeidaraEnterprises laughs in 90mm gun
@exosuit yes indeed it is.
@CptJacobson text I added on using picsart but it can be done with paint.
Images require you to upload screenshot to imgur then add them in using a link. There's a tutorial on it somewhere if you Google it.
@Jacobdaniel I have a fighter to submit but I'd like to submit it as an unlisted post. It will still be a successor. Is that alright?
Epic
@exosuit thank you
on flankers they tend to be farther back and I was using an Su-35 for visual reference.
But it might be a bit to far, yeah.
@randomusername First time I've seen a comparison like that, I really like it. Do you mind giving me a link to your jet?
+1@Pilotmario @randomusername @GabetheDoge Thank you guys.
+2@nicolascolissi14 Yes.
The key difference between SEAD and DEAD is the intent, not the outcome. While SEAD only seeks to make the enemy think twice about using air defences, DEAD missions are focused on the total destruction.
You can SEAD without DEAD but when you SEAD you can also DEAD. Basically how it goes.
@nicolascolissi14
Destruction
Of
Enemy
air
Defences
Its just some military lingo
@CrashFighter05 and was if everything you wanted?
@HarrisCraft aha, in all honesty I've never seen an astute class sub and I live near their drydock. I need to go one of these days.
@Roswell thanks
@HarrisCraft what can I say? I really liked the look of the Formidable class
@Mmdben I love your review of it, thank you. It was worth the time it took to get right.
@belugasub Thank you.
@BACconcordepilot I'll take that as a compliment. Max settings can do wonders on SP.
@Feanor @KerlonceauxIndustries @Randomusername @NFIGMT @USSR @yoshicraze @SodiumChloride @TheDarkAce @destroyerP @Pilotmario @Thecatbaron
Phew, lots of people. I'd like to thank you all for the support you've shown this build. I hope the momentum can keep going.
+3@TheDarkAce thank you
@Dllama4 Ah, I've been found out. Yes, influenced by them. Thanks.
@PositivePlanes Let's see how it goes. Thanks for the upvote
+1@PyrusEnderhunter Thank you
@Peanor @RocCrafter101 Thanks.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/jJddlb/Zerai-Deres-Class-Frigate
And it has arrived.
@jamesPLANESii that's a fair point, the image wasn't as dark on my end. Thanks for the tip.
Hot
It's funny I see this, I built what would happen if an F-18 and an Su-33 had kids.
Very nice build
+1@UnguidedCylinder no problem. Its a nice build
@Randomdoggo yes, haha. I tried to rein its speed in but it loves to run
Anbessa would like to know your location.
@CRJ900Pilot thanks
Me: I guess I'll start working on my new tank
Pilot: Have you met our lord and saviour, Victoria
Seriously nice work.
@TheRussiansAreComing thank you, I'll continue working my way to gold. Hopefully I'll get more traction to my builds.
+1@KerlonceauxIndustries thanks
+1@SakuraSaku thanks
@BoomiesYT Its less of a family and more versions. The two flanking it are versions of the plane to show my progress in the quality of my builds.
@BoomiesYT Thanks
+1