It's the Tupolev TU-144. The Concorde and the Tupolev are the only Drop-nose SST's, and it's not the Concorde by the characteristic tail design and it's engines. The Concorde has grouped exhausts, mounted in a singular pod. The early TU-144's had separate engine pods housing the four Kuznetsov NK-144 low-bypass turbofans. There's some inconsistencies, like the lack of the distinctive canards at the front end to aid in takeoff and the odd way the engines are positioned, although these canards were retractable at takeoff, but i'm sure you kept them folded just to make it less obvious, but i'm 85% certain it's the Tupolev TU-114. It can't be the Concorde by the engine style, It can't be the XB-70 Valkyrie, by the cockpit design and the single tail. Checkmate liberals.
On behalf of the tamrielic passages, we will no longer fight alongside you. We will remain fully neutral. We are not pleased with the way your empire has handles itself, and, under bribery, may supply vehicles. Do not expect militia support unless it is needed. You have gotten into far too many conflicts for us to sit in the blast radius. Our people are having monetary issues and we can no longer provide for many of our realms, let alone your common quarrels with other countries.
@TitanIncorporated Sorry, bucko. IOS can't do anything involving XML or mods, really. And it isn't fully incorporated yet. I get it first since i get beta.
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck @Awsomur @Oski @pavthepilot #YO I FOUND IT
<!--<DesignerPart name="Arresting Hook" category="Landing Gear" studioScale="0.75" description="Catches on arresting cables. Maybe if you use this you can finally manage to land on that carrier, despite your pilot skills?">
<Assembly>
<Parts>
<Part id="1" partType="ArrestingHook-1" position="0.0, 0.0, 0.0" rotation="0.0, 270.0, 0.0">
<ArrestingHook.State activationGroup="None" />
</Part>
</Parts>
</Assembly>
</DesignerPart>-->
PCMasterRace
@Bearclaw189
.
.
.
Seriously?
It's the Tupolev TU-144. The Concorde and the Tupolev are the only Drop-nose SST's, and it's not the Concorde by the characteristic tail design and it's engines. The Concorde has grouped exhausts, mounted in a singular pod. The early TU-144's had separate engine pods housing the four Kuznetsov NK-144 low-bypass turbofans. There's some inconsistencies, like the lack of the distinctive canards at the front end to aid in takeoff and the odd way the engines are positioned, although these canards were retractable at takeoff, but i'm sure you kept them folded just to make it less obvious, but i'm 85% certain it's the Tupolev TU-114. It can't be the Concorde by the engine style, It can't be the XB-70 Valkyrie, by the cockpit design and the single tail. Checkmate liberals.
link for proof
Also note the long, sharp nose and blunt cockpit when folded.
2 fam
On behalf of the tamrielic passages, we will no longer fight alongside you. We will remain fully neutral. We are not pleased with the way your empire has handles itself, and, under bribery, may supply vehicles. Do not expect militia support unless it is needed. You have gotten into far too many conflicts for us to sit in the blast radius. Our people are having monetary issues and we can no longer provide for many of our realms, let alone your common quarrels with other countries.
DEAR GOD LET ME TEST IT
Fantastic. It's cool that this is near 1-1 scale.
"We are not going to moderate every curse word, but please try to keep it clean."
Sneezes
Mustard is the single greatest aviation youtuber in my opinion.
@CruzerBlade My old 2012 WOW rig with NO GRAPHICS CARD runs 2500+ part planes on medium settings at 46 FPS.
This is actually really interesting. Since I live higher up in the mountains in NA could I pick up satellite signals?
Also, Stop fretting about the accent. It's fine.
@asteroidbook345 Uh, no. Most i've seen is 6K.
@Simplemike idk
@TitanIncorporated Sorry, bucko. IOS can't do anything involving XML or mods, really. And it isn't fully incorporated yet. I get it first since i get beta.
Gloats in Core I5
bro u know xml more than 10k is impossible right unless you make a bug you makin an unbeatable challenge
@jamesPLANESii F
@Vidal99977 The dont-beg-for-upvotes part.
cough, rules, cough
@Oski i saw it theres a location there
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck @Awsomur @Oski @pavthepilot #YO I FOUND IT
<!--<DesignerPart name="Arresting Hook" category="Landing Gear" studioScale="0.75" description="Catches on arresting cables. Maybe if you use this you can finally manage to land on that carrier, despite your pilot skills?">
<Assembly>
<Parts>
<Part id="1" partType="ArrestingHook-1" position="0.0, 0.0, 0.0" rotation="0.0, 270.0, 0.0">
<ArrestingHook.State activationGroup="None" />
</Part>
</Parts>
</Assembly>
</DesignerPart>-->
omfg i want it
@HistoricBirds crap sorry man dinner
want to play
@HistoricBirds so u wanna do mp
F
@EternalDarkness Has a seizure out of excitement
7 maf
Also beast spawn is messed up
@HistoricBirds im in
@HistoricBirds where u go
@HistoricBirds You in
@HistoricBirds 10/4 i'll be in a fancy boi
@HistoricBirds ok whatever
you still in tho
@HistoricBirds U got a mic
@HistoricBirds I'm here
@JohnnyBoythePilot Considering it'd be useless to have a USS beast catapult discovered location, yeah.
Also there's apparently a part for it soon so yeah
@Spacedoge12345plane
Dell inspiron 2012 core I5 version. No GPU card. All stock
Pre-Beta- ~1200 pts with all low settings
Post beta- ~ 3400 pts with all settings except for shadows
@doge Core I5 2800 and dell onboard graphics
bro. I think the fact by 2013 office pc got 100 fps with this
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/CLvM35/Dodge-Charger-1970-R-T
is enough.
@Rawhide Yo they did there were some guys holding shirts that said sub 2 pew die pie
Wow! Just... Wow.
Good to see you, man.
@Strikefighter04 He's obviously using white-walls.
And white treads..
@Falken Neet
So what does it do? I'm curious.
Gtfo.
waluigiforsmash
It's GORGEOUS!!!
I want to try this.
Can you tag me when it comes out?
We had a Bus slip off the road and nearly end up in a creek. Good times.
@Piolt1 The P-51 was a marvel of it's time. Definitely agree.
Sorry @Simple0record0egg
No egg jokes for you.