@toxicgamer88 Nαι είμαι. Το Μ2000-5 που έφτιαξες είναι πολύ καλό κ αρκετά προχωρημένο για το επίπεδό σου. Για να μην μιλάμε στο post και χαλάμε την εικόνα με τα όμορφα σχόλια στα αγγλικά, έχεις discord να τα πούμε εκεί?
@Viper3000ad Σωστές οι παρατηρήσεις σου και χαίρομαι πολύ που συναντώ μετά από πολύ καιρό Έλληνες στο SP. Είμαι και στο discord αν θέλετε να πούμε 2-3 πραγματάκια για το παιχνίδι. (username: Dimkal#6514)
@toxicgamer88 Λοιπόν φίλε μου, σαν προσπάθεια είναι πολύ καλή λαμβάνοντας υπόψη το επίπεδό σου και τη γενικότερη εμπειρία σου. Τα κυριότερα λάθη στα υπέδειξε ο EternalDarkness (Μilan λέγεται και είναι Σέρβος, γνωριζόμαστε απο το 2016) οπότε δε θα στα αναλύσω και γω. Αυτό που με ενόχλησε πολύ είναι που ζητάς feature στο description. Είναι πολύ φθηνό και δείχνει ανυπομονησία. Γενικά κράτα low profile και συνέχισε να φτιάχνεις ό,τι σου αρέσει και σου κατεβαίνει στο μυαλό. Πάρε ωραία και λειτουργικά builds και "άνοιξέ" τα και προσπάθησε να δεις τι τεχνικές χρησιμοποιούν. Με λένε Δημήτρη και θα χαρώ πολύ να σε βοηθήσω αν και εφόσον χρειάζεσαι βοήθεια με κάτι, Είμαι και στο discord αν το χρησιμοποιείς.
The build is very good with many details and features. But, u should improve drastically the flight behavior and upgrade all the flight controls and flight stability systems. Also, try to remove all unecessary drag from ur build and adjust engine power so as to have more realistic acceleration for this type of aircraft and its weight. I really like the general layout and I especially like a lot the cockpit and the ldg design. Great job!
@RamboJutter Literally, one of ur best aircrafts! It flies so smoothly and its so role-capable! It could be Britain's long arm for tatical nuclear delivery during the Cold War and it could serve during thr 90s and 00s with a major modification and mission systems update! I really enjoyed flying it! Great job, mate!
@mikoyanster very well-build aircraft! Would love to see it with air-to-ground capability too! And thnx for putting it in a pic with the T-61L Kestrel!
@Tang0five From a narrowed-down perspective yes it's the "same" aircraft. But, it has so many new custom-made features and weapons and a whole new improved flight behavior that u can literally say it's a new aircraft.
@Tang0five Thank u for ur nice comment. If u try n read the description it says that "the F/A-61EQ it’s an upgraded variant of the FA-61C/D Combat Tercel aircraft with many modifications..."
@Randomdoggo Don't stop building and posting. With every build u will become a better builder and have better technique. Also, the F/A-61 its not replica, is a completely fictional aircraft.
@munchakoopa Usually, I write the description alongside the building process so as to immediately incorporate any changes. Also, I love giving an enticing background with many interesting facts for my planes and I love editing pics. So its a win-win for me!
@JoddyFubuki788 @OC3LOT1142 @Sarin @LordSatan Thank u guys for ur comments and all the support. Due to increased work I had to slowly build n test it but it turned out pretty well as it seems. I got more projects in my sandbox and many surprises to come. Thank u again!
@Minecraftpoweer Although, I hardly ever upvote anything apart from aircrafts, helicopters and some military vehicles, I must say that u trully deserve to be upvoted and get featued for ur ingeniously designed build. Great concept and amazing building detail. Also, I want to ask u what image processing program u used for this picture
@FairFireFight very good effort but still need to improve detailing and handling in the bomb. Take a look at that so u can "borrow" some elements and get a nice look of a modern guided munition.
@maruoshio For a strange reason, I cannot load this plane into the sandbox when dowloaded. I tried with other aircrafts and everything was ok. I have downloaded it many times and always the same thing...any ideas????
One of the best-looking planes in site with great functionality and easy handling. Really fun to fly with and lot of details. Great custom-made weapons too!Ur best job so far!
@LegnaK When u say non hypersonic aircrafts I believe u mean aircrafts that can achieve Mach5+ speeds. Maybe u should be more specific and revise the non-hypersonic aircrafts rule. You can instead put an upper speed limit, for example max speed of 3,000mph @ 70,000ft at full throttle or something like this, so the contestants can easily tune their airplanes and meet the rule.
@JohnnyBoythePilot Funny thing is that my previous plane, the T-61N, was way better and had more features and didn't get featured, but.....SP is a weird place...hehehe
@JohnnyBoythePilot That's true! While I was doing some final refinements on the build I read on the news that Boeing/SAAB T-X won the USAF contract...I should have been quicker! Heheheeee
@ChiChiWerx If u read the instruction, u should use the brake button only for 2 secs and after stop immediately dis-engage AG5. It takes some practice but after a couple of times u know how to use braking.
@RamboJutter I just posted my latest build, the T-61N Sparrowhawk II. I've been working on it for over a month. If u want u can check it.Feedback is always welcomed.
Its a great effort and flies pretty nice. Two remarks:
1) Reduce the roll rate, adjust the roll deflection to 20-30 degrees
2) Increase the pitch movement by doing better weight distribution (CoM closer to CoL) and adjusting elevator deflection/movement
@mikoyanster That's a nice little bugger! I love the engine placement and the handling! Great design my friend! I also have a question: How did u manage to take these beautiful pics? They look so nicely taken and with a great posing.
@Indecision Can I use it in the description of my latest project? It will refer that my new aircraft is going to replace the fleet of modernised F-55Es of many countries around the world in the role of air-to-ground precision strike.
@mikoyanster That's an excellent piece of engineering! I really like the description pics. The angles are amazing and they look so vivid and have an extremely fine definition. I bet u got a new gaming machine!
@udyog This is a fine piece of aerospace engineering! Great detailing, nice handling and pretty close replica! I'm amazed by the building quality regarding ur level! Keep up the good job and I'll have my eye on u!
@BogdanX First of all I wanna congratulate u for ur highly detailed aircraft. In terms of building quality and handling ur Catalina is possibly the best in challenge. BUT, it has been clearly stated in the challenge description that armament and anti-ship capability will be taken into account and add extra point. Maybe, I should have established a "TOP BUILDING QUALITY" award too. And u my friend would have won it for sure. I know that u may be upset and angry but I want u to know that I don't have anything against u and consider u still my friend even after all these bad words u said against me...Hope to be well and thnx again for ur participation.
Why no trim?
@toxicgamer88 Nαι είμαι. Το Μ2000-5 που έφτιαξες είναι πολύ καλό κ αρκετά προχωρημένο για το επίπεδό σου. Για να μην μιλάμε στο post και χαλάμε την εικόνα με τα όμορφα σχόλια στα αγγλικά, έχεις discord να τα πούμε εκεί?
@Viper3000ad Σωστές οι παρατηρήσεις σου και χαίρομαι πολύ που συναντώ μετά από πολύ καιρό Έλληνες στο SP. Είμαι και στο discord αν θέλετε να πούμε 2-3 πραγματάκια για το παιχνίδι. (username: Dimkal#6514)
@toxicgamer88 Λοιπόν φίλε μου, σαν προσπάθεια είναι πολύ καλή λαμβάνοντας υπόψη το επίπεδό σου και τη γενικότερη εμπειρία σου. Τα κυριότερα λάθη στα υπέδειξε ο EternalDarkness (Μilan λέγεται και είναι Σέρβος, γνωριζόμαστε απο το 2016) οπότε δε θα στα αναλύσω και γω. Αυτό που με ενόχλησε πολύ είναι που ζητάς feature στο description. Είναι πολύ φθηνό και δείχνει ανυπομονησία. Γενικά κράτα low profile και συνέχισε να φτιάχνεις ό,τι σου αρέσει και σου κατεβαίνει στο μυαλό. Πάρε ωραία και λειτουργικά builds και "άνοιξέ" τα και προσπάθησε να δεις τι τεχνικές χρησιμοποιούν. Με λένε Δημήτρη και θα χαρώ πολύ να σε βοηθήσω αν και εφόσον χρειάζεσαι βοήθεια με κάτι, Είμαι και στο discord αν το χρησιμοποιείς.
The build is very good with many details and features. But, u should improve drastically the flight behavior and upgrade all the flight controls and flight stability systems. Also, try to remove all unecessary drag from ur build and adjust engine power so as to have more realistic acceleration for this type of aircraft and its weight. I really like the general layout and I especially like a lot the cockpit and the ldg design. Great job!
@RamboJutter Literally, one of ur best aircrafts! It flies so smoothly and its so role-capable! It could be Britain's long arm for tatical nuclear delivery during the Cold War and it could serve during thr 90s and 00s with a major modification and mission systems update! I really enjoyed flying it! Great job, mate!
@enzoBoeing757 then u will do it a clickable text
@enzoBoeing757 nothing bro....just !()[pic link]
@enzoBoeing757 same procedure....copy the image link and paste it in this format: !( )[pic link goes here]
@mikoyanster very well-build aircraft! Would love to see it with air-to-ground capability too! And thnx for putting it in a pic with the T-61L Kestrel!
+2@Tang0five From a narrowed-down perspective yes it's the "same" aircraft. But, it has so many new custom-made features and weapons and a whole new improved flight behavior that u can literally say it's a new aircraft.
@Tang0five Thank u for ur nice comment. If u try n read the description it says that "the F/A-61EQ it’s an upgraded variant of the FA-61C/D Combat Tercel aircraft with many modifications..."
@Randomdoggo Don't stop building and posting. With every build u will become a better builder and have better technique. Also, the F/A-61 its not replica, is a completely fictional aircraft.
@munchakoopa Usually, I write the description alongside the building process so as to immediately incorporate any changes. Also, I love giving an enticing background with many interesting facts for my planes and I love editing pics. So its a win-win for me!
@JoddyFubuki788 If u need any help with that just ask me. I'll try to do my best according my time.
@Franticmatty pls consider test-flying this fighter for ur next SP video in YouTube.
@JoddyFubuki788 @OC3LOT1142 @Sarin @LordSatan Thank u guys for ur comments and all the support. Due to increased work I had to slowly build n test it but it turned out pretty well as it seems. I got more projects in my sandbox and many surprises to come. Thank u again!
+1@Minecraftpoweer I used ur picture technique for the description of my latest aircraft here
@typeZERO I'm not specialized in Russian weapons, yet. Next pack may contain some russian-made weapons.
+2@Sgtk Thank u a lot for ur kind words! RamboJutter showed me the camo technique and after some practice its quite easy. Hope u enjoy flying it!
+1@Minecraftpoweer Although, I hardly ever upvote anything apart from aircrafts, helicopters and some military vehicles, I must say that u trully deserve to be upvoted and get featued for ur ingeniously designed build. Great concept and amazing building detail. Also, I want to ask u what image processing program u used for this picture
@FairFireFight very good effort but still need to improve detailing and handling in the bomb. Take a look at that so u can "borrow" some elements and get a nice look of a modern guided munition.
@maruoshio For a strange reason, I cannot load this plane into the sandbox when dowloaded. I tried with other aircrafts and everything was ok. I have downloaded it many times and always the same thing...any ideas????
@Franticmatty Give this training bird a test-fly! U will enjoy it, guaranteed!!!
@Franticmatty If u wanna check this out and put it on ur next vid. See details on description.
@Alienbeef0421 Basic image editing capability...I know they look quite fake but its the best I can do...hehehe
+1@Morel234 It's part of the building process to write detailed descriptions! I love it!
@Aeroman77 Thank u my friend. Its my most detailed airplane so far...over 3 months of intensive work and flight-testing....
+1One of the best-looking planes in site with great functionality and easy handling. Really fun to fly with and lot of details. Great custom-made weapons too!Ur best job so far!
@LegnaK When u say non hypersonic aircrafts I believe u mean aircrafts that can achieve Mach5+ speeds. Maybe u should be more specific and revise the non-hypersonic aircrafts rule. You can instead put an upper speed limit, for example max speed of 3,000mph @ 70,000ft at full throttle or something like this, so the contestants can easily tune their airplanes and meet the rule.
+1@bjac0 Yes! Its a very useful tool and has many features
@JohnnyBoythePilot Funny thing is that my previous plane, the T-61N, was way better and had more features and didn't get featured, but.....SP is a weird place...hehehe
+1@JohnnyBoythePilot That's true! While I was doing some final refinements on the build I read on the news that Boeing/SAAB T-X won the USAF contract...I should have been quicker! Heheheeee
+1@ChiChiWerx Thank u my friend! Ur advices were very helpful!
@XjayIndustrys prepare it in word doc before and paste it right after posting.
@Tazziedevil04 It's a new technique I'm working on. If u don't like the pics just ignore them...no need to make fun of someone's honest effort....
@Tessemi I don't see why someone do not like a trainer jet. I believe that they are nice planes and quite useful in their role.
@danman12 I'm using a picture editing program called PaintNet. Its free, easy to use and helps me to create these images.
@ChiChiWerx If u read the instruction, u should use the brake button only for 2 secs and after stop immediately dis-engage AG5. It takes some practice but after a couple of times u know how to use braking.
@RamboJutter I just posted my latest build, the T-61N Sparrowhawk II. I've been working on it for over a month. If u want u can check it.Feedback is always welcomed.
@RamboJutter If u want, change the name to the more accurate HAF Mirage 2000-5 MkII
@RamboJutter This is an amazing build and I'm quite proud as a Greek to see a HAF M.2000-5 in SP!
Its a great effort and flies pretty nice. Two remarks:
1) Reduce the roll rate, adjust the roll deflection to 20-30 degrees
2) Increase the pitch movement by doing better weight distribution (CoM closer to CoL) and adjusting elevator deflection/movement
@Dragon77 Great effort for a player at ur level! Flies nice and has many features. Keep up the good work!
@mikoyanster That's a nice little bugger! I love the engine placement and the handling! Great design my friend! I also have a question: How did u manage to take these beautiful pics? They look so nicely taken and with a great posing.
+1@Indecision Can I use it in the description of my latest project? It will refer that my new aircraft is going to replace the fleet of modernised F-55Es of many countries around the world in the role of air-to-ground precision strike.
@mikoyanster That's an excellent piece of engineering! I really like the description pics. The angles are amazing and they look so vivid and have an extremely fine definition. I bet u got a new gaming machine!
+1@udyog This is a fine piece of aerospace engineering! Great detailing, nice handling and pretty close replica! I'm amazed by the building quality regarding ur level! Keep up the good job and I'll have my eye on u!
+1@BogdanX First of all I wanna congratulate u for ur highly detailed aircraft. In terms of building quality and handling ur Catalina is possibly the best in challenge. BUT, it has been clearly stated in the challenge description that armament and anti-ship capability will be taken into account and add extra point. Maybe, I should have established a "TOP BUILDING QUALITY" award too. And u my friend would have won it for sure. I know that u may be upset and angry but I want u to know that I don't have anything against u and consider u still my friend even after all these bad words u said against me...Hope to be well and thnx again for ur participation.
+3@ErvenDynamics If I have some free time I may come up with a new challenge. Thanks again for ur participation.